TWO LEVELS FUSION DECISION FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE PATTERN RECOGNITION

Abstract. Major goal of multispectral data analysis is land cover classification and related applications. The dimension drawback leads to a small ratio of the remote sensing training data compared to the number of features. Therefore robust methods should be associated to overcome the dimensionality curse. The presented work proposed a pattern recognition approach. Source separation, feature extraction and decisional fusion are the main stages to establish an automatic pattern recognizer. The first stage is pre-processing and is based on non linear source separation. The mixing process is considered non linear with gaussians distributions. The second stage performs feature extraction for Gabor, Wavelet and Curvelet transform. Feature information presentation provides an efficient information description for machine vision projects. The third stage is a decisional fusion performed in two steps. The first step assign the best feature to each source/pattern using the accuracy matrix obtained from the learning data set. The second step is a source majority vote. Classification is performed by Support Vector Machine. Experimentation results show that the proposed fusion method enhances the classification accuracy and provide powerful tool for pattern recognition.

[1]  E. Candès,et al.  Curvelets: A Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges , 2000 .

[2]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari,et al.  Bayesian source separation: beyond PCA and ICA , 2006, ESANN.

[3]  C. Abdallah Application of remote sensing and geographical information system for the study of mass movements in Lebanon , 2007 .

[4]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  Segmentation of multispectral remote sensing images using active support vector machines , 2004, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  Branislav Bajat,et al.  Geological Units Classification of Multispectral Images by Using Support Vector Machines , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[6]  Zhiyu Zhang,et al.  Comparison of wavelet, Gabor and curvelet transform for face recognition , 2011 .

[7]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age , 2008, CSUR.

[8]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[9]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  An overview of statistical learning theory , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[10]  Olivier Zammit,et al.  Apprentissage non supervise des SVM p ar un algorithme des K-moyennes entropique pour la detection de zones brulees , 2007 .

[11]  Mohamed Saber Naceur,et al.  A Spectral and Spatial Source Separation of Multispectral Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Jean-Yves Tourneret,et al.  Nonlinear unmixing of hyperspectral images using a generalized bilinear model , 2011 .

[13]  Amir Rajaei,et al.  Wavelet Features Extraction for Medical Image Classification , 2011 .

[14]  Juha Karhunen,et al.  Approximate Riemannian Conjugate Gradient Learning for Fixed-Form Variational Bayes , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Sparse Image Reconstruction With Application to MRFM , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[17]  Juha Karhunen,et al.  Blind separation of nonlinear mixtures by variational Bayesian learning , 2007, Digit. Signal Process..

[18]  Gilles Burel,et al.  Blind separation of sources: A nonlinear neural algorithm , 1992, Neural Networks.