Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration

ObjectiveMagnetic resonance T2 mapping allows for the quantification of water and proteoglycan content within tissues and can be used to detect early cartilage abnormalities as well as to track the response to therapy. The goal of the present study was to use T2 mapping to quantify intervertebral disk water content according to the Pfirrmann classification.Materials and methodsThis study involved 60 subjects who underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (a total of 300 lumbar disks). The degree of disk degeneration was assessed in the midsagittal section on T2-weighted images according to the Pfirrmann classification (grades I to V). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed among grades to determine the cut-off values.ResultsIn the nucleus pulposus, T2 values tended to decrease with increasing grade, and there was a significant difference in T2 values between each grade from grades I to IV. However, there was no significant difference in T2 values in the anterior or posterior annulus fibrosus. T2 values according to disk degeneration level classification were as follows: grade I (>116.8 ms), grade II (92.7–116.7 ms), grade III (72.1–92.6 ms), grade IV (<72.0 ms).ConclusionT2 values decreased with increasing Pfirrmann classification grade in the nucleus pulposus, likely reflecting a decrease in proteoglycan and water content. Thus, T2 value-based measurements of intervertebral disk water content may be useful for future clinical research on degenerative disk diseases.

[1]  C. A. Rockwood,et al.  THE AMERICAN Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  M. Modic,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral disk disease. Clinical and pulse sequence considerations. , 1984, Radiology.

[3]  J. Urban,et al.  Swelling Pressure of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs: Influence of Age, Spinal Level, Composition, and Degeneration , 1988, Spine.

[4]  H. Genant,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM , 1988, The Lancet.

[5]  S. Furner,et al.  Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States , 1992 .

[6]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  Correlating magnetic resonance imaging with the biochemical content of the normal human intervertebral disc , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  C. Boesch,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Low back pain : a scientific and clinical overview , 1996 .

[9]  P. Hardy Intervertebral disks on MR images: variation in signal intensity with the disk-to-magnetic field orientation. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  L. Steinbach,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: Part 3. The elbow. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  H. Fritts,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Part 8. The spine, section 2. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J Pentti,et al.  Recurrent low back pain and early disc degeneration in the young. , 1999, Spine.

[13]  L. Manchikanti Epidemiology of low back pain. , 2000, Pain physician.

[14]  A. MacKay,et al.  A model of unloaded human intervertebral disk based on NMR relaxation , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. Heckman,et al.  Selected Instructional Course Lectures The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons , 2000 .

[16]  M. Segal,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Relaxation and Water Diffusion in the Human Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Under Compression In Vitro , 2001, Spine.

[17]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[18]  H. Ueda,et al.  Diurnal T2 value changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[19]  H. Paajanen,et al.  Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc degeneration , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[20]  Keita Ito,et al.  Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[21]  T. Mosher,et al.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[22]  C. Mistretta,et al.  The value of T2 relaxation times to characterize lumbar intervertebral disks: preliminary results. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  V. Haughton,et al.  Changes in T2 Relaxation Times Associated with Maturation of the Human Intervertebral Disk , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[25]  F. Schick,et al.  T2‐ and diffusion‐maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: An in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  V. Haughton,et al.  T2 Relaxation Times of Intervertebral Disc Tissue Correlated With Water Content and Proteoglycan Content , 2009, Spine.

[27]  Masashi Miyazaki,et al.  Dynamic Bulging of Intervertebral Discs in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine , 2009, Spine.

[28]  K. Friedrich,et al.  T2 measurements of cartilage in osteoarthritis patients with meniscal tears. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  V. Haughton,et al.  T2 Relaxation Times Correlated with Stage of Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Patient Age , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  John Kornak,et al.  In vivo 3.0‐tesla magnetic resonance T1ρ and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.