Taking It for a Test Drive: A Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Model for Wildlife Poaching Prediction Evaluated Through a Controlled Field Test

Worldwide, conservation agencies employ rangers to protect conservation areas from poachers. However, agencies lack the manpower to have rangers effectively patrol these vast areas frequently. While past work has modeled poachers’ behavior so as to aid rangers in planning future patrols, those models’ predictions were not validated by extensive field tests. In this paper, we present a hybrid spatio-temporal model that predicts poaching threat levels and results from a five-month field test of our model in Uganda’s Queen Elizabeth Protected Area (QEPA). To our knowledge, this is the first time that a predictive model has been evaluated through such an extensive field test in this domain. We present two major contributions. First, our hybrid model consists of two components: (i) an ensemble model which can work with the limited data common to this domain and (ii) a spatio-temporal model to boost the ensemble’s predictions when sufficient data are available. When evaluated on real-world historical data from QEPA, our hybrid model achieves significantly better performance than previous approaches with either temporally-aware dynamic Bayesian networks or an ensemble of spatially-aware models. Second, in collaboration with the Wildlife Conservation Society and Uganda Wildlife Authority, we present results from a five-month controlled experiment where rangers patrolled over 450 sq km across QEPA. We demonstrate that our model successfully predicted (1) where snaring activity would occur and (2) where it would not occur; in areas where we predicted a high rate of snaring activity, rangers found more snares and snared animals than in areas of lower predicted activity. These findings demonstrate that (1) our model’s predictions are selective, (2) our model’s superior laboratory performance extends to the real world, and (3) these predictive models can aid rangers in focusing their efforts to prevent wildlife poaching and save animals.

[1]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Cloudy with a Chance of Poaching: Adversary Behavior Modeling and Forecasting with Real-World Poaching Data , 2017, AAMAS.

[2]  Milind Tambe,et al.  CAPTURE: A New Predictive Anti-Poaching Tool for Wildlife Protection , 2016, AAMAS.

[3]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Spatial and spatiotemporal clustering methods for detecting elephant poaching hotspots , 2015 .

[4]  Bing Liu,et al.  Learning with Positive and Unlabeled Examples Using Weighted Logistic Regression , 2003, ICML.

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  H. O'Kelly,et al.  Monitoring conservation threats, interventions and impacts on wildlife in a Cambodian tropical forest , 2013 .

[7]  A. Plumptre,et al.  Spatiotemporal trends of illegal activities from ranger‐collected data in a Ugandan national park , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: A Hybrid Approach to Alleviating Class Imbalance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[9]  Andrew J. Plumptre,et al.  Improving Law‐Enforcement Effectiveness and Efficiency in Protected Areas Using Ranger‐collected Monitoring Data , 2017 .

[10]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[11]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Elephant poaching risk assessed using spatial and non-spatial Bayesian models , 2016 .

[12]  Robert T. Collins,et al.  Belief Propagation in a 3D Spatio-temporal MRF for Moving Object Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.