International arrivals: widespread bioinvasions in European Seas

The European Union lacks a comprehensive framework to address the threats posed by the introduction and spread of marine non-indigenous species (NIS). Current efforts are fragmented and suffer substantial gaps in coverage. In this paper we identify and discuss issues relating to the assessment of spatial and temporal patterns of introductions in European Seas (ES), based on a scientifically validated information system of aquatic non-indigenous and cryptogenic species, AquaNIS. While recognizing the limitations of the existing data, we extract information that can be used to assess the relative risk of introductions for different taxonomic groups, geographic regions and likely vectors. The dataset comprises 879 multicellular NIS. We applied a country-based approach to assess patterns of NIS richness in ES, and identify the principal introduction routes and vectors, the most widespread NIS and their spatial and temporal spread patterns. Between 1970 and 2013, the number of recorded NIS has grown by 86, 173 and 204% in the Baltic, Western European margin and the Mediterranean, respectively; 52 of the 879 NIS were recorded in 10 or more countries, and 25 NIS first recorded in European seas since 1990 have since been reported in five or more countries. Our results highlight the ever-rising role of shipping (commercial and recreational) as a vector for the widespread and recently spread NIS. The Suez Canal, a corridor unique to the Mediterranean, is responsible for the increased introduction of new thermophilic NIS into this warming sea. The 2020 goal of the EU Biodiversity Strategy concerning marine Invasive Alien Species may not be fully attainable. The setting of a new target date should be accompanied by scientifically robust, sensible and pragmatic plans to minimize introductions of marine NIS and to study those present.

[1]  Inger Wallentinus,et al.  Introduced marine organisms as habitat modifiers. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Biological Invasions and Cryptogenic Species , 1996 .

[3]  M. Coll,et al.  Synthesis of Knowledge on Marine Biodiversity in European Seas: From Census to Sustainable Management , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Ø. Strand,et al.  Massive settlements of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, in Scandinavia , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[5]  B. Galil,et al.  Protist transport via ballast water — biological classification of ballast tanks by food web interactions , 1997 .

[6]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts? , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[7]  Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi,et al.  A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool? , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[8]  COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT , 2006 .

[9]  B. Galil The Marine Caravan – The Suez Canal and the Erythrean Invasion , 2006 .

[10]  F. Gómez Phytoplankton invasions: comments on the validity of categorizing the non-indigenous dinoflagellates and diatoms in European seas. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[11]  J. Carlton Bioinvasion Ecology: Assessing Invasion Impact and Scale , 2002 .

[12]  L. Ivany,et al.  Climate Change and Trophic Response of the Antarctic Bottom Fauna , 2009, PloS one.

[13]  B. Galil Truth and consequences: the bioinvasion of the Mediterranean Sea. , 2012, Integrative zoology.

[14]  A. Marchini,et al.  AquaNIS: a new generation information system on aquatic non-indigenous and cryptogenic species , 2013 .

[15]  J. Geller,et al.  Ballast water as a vector for tintinnid transport , 1997 .

[16]  Liao Ming-sheng,et al.  Brief Introduction of the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship's Ballast Water and Sediments Newly Adopted by IMO , 2004 .

[17]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  A. Occhipinti‐Ambrogi Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[19]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Deep Invasion Ecology and the Assembly of Communities in Historical Time , 2009 .

[20]  D. Richardson,et al.  Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[21]  Marinko Učur,et al.  International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments (imo, 2004) , 2011 .

[22]  S. Gollasch,et al.  Bridging Divides: Maritime Canals as Invasion Corridors , 2010 .

[23]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate: A Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment , 2013 .

[24]  Stephan Gollasch,et al.  Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution, Impacts and Management , 2002, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  K. Reise,et al.  On the population development of the introduced razor clamEnsis americanus near the island of Sylt (North Sea) , 1998, Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen.

[26]  Matej David,et al.  Making non-indigenous species information systems practical for management and useful for research: An aquatic perspective , 2014 .

[27]  M. Visser,et al.  Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  W. Wolff,et al.  Non-indigenous marine and estuarine species in The Netherlands. , 2005 .

[29]  N. Mieszkowska,et al.  Climate change and non-native species in the North Atlantic. , 2011 .

[30]  M. Lehtiniemi,et al.  Ten recommendations for advancing the assessment and management of non-indigenous species in marine ecosystems , 2014 .

[31]  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL , 2011 .

[32]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Gustaaf M. Hallegraeff,et al.  Transport of diatom and dinoflagellate resting spores in ships' ballast water: implications for plankton biogeography and aquaculture , 1992 .

[34]  H. Mooney,et al.  Vector science and integrated vector management in bioinvasion ecology: conceptual frameworks. , 2005 .

[35]  Nicholas J. Bax,et al.  Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity , 2003 .

[36]  T. Smayda Reflections on the ballast water dispersal- : harmful algal bloom paradigm , 2007 .

[37]  M. Verlaque Checklist of the macroalgae of Thau Lagoon (Hérault, France), a hot spot of marine species introduction in Europe , 2001 .

[38]  K. Wasson,et al.  Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport , 2001 .

[39]  M. Ellegaard,et al.  Reconstructing the history of an invasion: the toxic phytoplankton species Gymnodinium catenatum in the Northeast Atlantic , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[40]  Matej David,et al.  EU shipping in the dawn of managing the ballast water issue. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[41]  M. V. Vander Zanden,et al.  Twenty years of invasion: a review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. , 2012, Journal of fish biology.