Multicenter Validation of the McGovern Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening Score.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is defined as blunt trauma to the head and neck leading to damage to the vertebral and/or carotid arteries; which children are considered "high-risk" and in need of angiographic/vessel imaging varies. We previously proposed a screening tool, the McGovern Score, to identify pediatric trauma patients at high risk for BCVI, and we aim to validate the McGovern score by pooling data from multiple pediatric trauma centers. This is a multicenter, hospital-based, cohort study from all prospectively registered pediatric (<16 years) trauma patients who presented to the emergency department between 2003 and 2017 at 6 level 1 pediatric trauma centers. The registry was retrospectively queried for patients who received a CTA as a screening method for BCVI. Age, length of follow-up, mechanism of injury, arrival Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and focal neurological deficit were recorded. Radiological variables queried were the presence of a carotid canal fracture, petrous temporal bone fracture, and CT presence of infarction. Patients with BCVI were queried for mode of treatment, type of intracranial injury, artery damaged, and BCVI injury grade. The McGovern score was calculated for all patients who underwent CTA across all data groups. A total of 1012 patients underwent CTA; 72 of these patients were found to have BCVI, 51 of which were in the validation cohort. Across all data groups, the McGovern score has a >80% sensitivity and >98% NPV. The McGovern Score for Pediatric BCVI is an effective, generalizable screening tool.

[1]  R. Lefering,et al.  Predictors for Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury (BCVI): An International Multicenter Analysis , 2019, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  H. Ford,et al.  Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries in pediatric trauma patients. , 2019, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  D. Limbrick,et al.  Predicting Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Pediatric Trauma: Validation of the "Utah Score". , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  H. Forman,et al.  Screening for Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Review of Literature and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. , 2015, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[5]  E. Moore,et al.  Endovascular stenting is rarely necessary for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[6]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in the child. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[7]  M. Wright,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  T. Fabian,et al.  Optimal outcomes for patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI): tailoring treatment to the lesion. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  G. Zagli,et al.  Diagnosis of carotid arterial injury in major trauma using a modification of Memphis criteria , 2010, Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine.

[10]  A. Hirshberg,et al.  Comparison of conservative and operative treatment for blunt carotid injuries: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[12]  E. Moore,et al.  Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[13]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.