CO2, GDP and RET: An aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey

There is a worldwide interest in renewable electricity technologies (RETs) due to growing concerns about global warming and climate change. As an EU candidate country whose energy demand increases exponentially, Turkey inevitably shares this common interest on RET. This study, using an aggregate economic equilibrium model, explores the economic costs of different policy measures to mitigate CO2 emissions in Turkey. The model combines energy demands, capital requirements and labor inputs at a constant elasticity of substitution under an economy-wide nested production function. Growing energy demand, triggered by economic growth, is met by increased supply and initiates new capacity additions. Investment into RET is encouraged via the incorporation of (a) endogenous technological learning through which the RET cost declines as a function of cumulative capacity, and (b) a willingness to pay (WTP) function which imposes the WTP of consumers as a lower bound on RET installation. The WTP equation is obtained as a function of consumer income categories, based on data gathered from a pilot survey in which the contingent valuation methodology was employed. The impacts of various emission reduction scenarios on GDP growth and RET diffusion are explored. As expected, RET penetration is accelerated under faster technological learning and higher WTP conditions. It is found that stabilizing CO2 emissions to year 2005 levels causes economic losses amounting to 17% and 23% of GDP in the years 2020 and 2030, respectively.

[1]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[2]  E. Yeldan,et al.  Economics of environmental policy in Turkey: A general equilibrium investigation of the economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction policies for climate change , 2008 .

[3]  Karin Ibenholt Explaining learning curves for wind power , 2002 .

[4]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Substitution Effects in CVM Values , 1994 .

[5]  Melih Soner Celiktas,et al.  A quadratic helix approach to evaluate the Turkish renewable energies , 2009 .

[6]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost dynamics of wind power , 1999 .

[7]  T. Teisberg,et al.  CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment , 1992 .

[8]  K. Vadlamannati,et al.  Does Higher Economic and Financial Development Lead to Environmental Degradation: Evidence from BRIC Countries , 2017 .

[9]  David J. Bjornstad,et al.  The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs. , 1996 .

[10]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[11]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[12]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[13]  Tirso Leonardo Barreto Gómez,et al.  Technological Learning in Energy Optimisation Models and Deployment of Emerging Technologies , 2001 .

[14]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies , 1993 .

[15]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[16]  B. Bhaskara Rao,et al.  Do Economic, Financial and Institutional Developments Matter for Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Transitional Economies , 2008 .

[17]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MARKAL-MACRO: A linked model for energy-economy analysis , 1992 .

[18]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies , 1996 .

[19]  M. Pauly,et al.  Universal health insurance in the Clinton plan: coverage as a tax-financed public good. , 1994, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[20]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[21]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  A Jobs-Based Analysis of Labor Markets , 1995 .

[22]  Wenying Chen,et al.  Carbon emission control strategies for China: A comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model , 2007 .

[23]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  Policy evaluations under environmental constraints using a computable general equilibrium model , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .

[25]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  A Real Options Evaluation Model for the Diffusion Prospects of New Renewable Power Generation Technologies , 2008 .

[26]  Fatih Evrendilek,et al.  Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources in Turkey , 2003 .

[27]  M. Lieberman The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy , 1987 .

[28]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[29]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2004 .

[30]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[31]  Koji Tokimatsu,et al.  Analysis of Carbon Emission Stabilization Targets and Adaptation by Integrated Assessment Model , 1999 .

[32]  Y. Arıkan,et al.  Endogenising emission taxes A general equilibrium type optimisation model applied for Turkey , 2001 .