Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.

We investigated the attentional capture effect of emotional faces under sufficient or restricted attentional conditions. In a modified visual search paradigm, three kinds of schematic faces (angry, happy, and neutral) served as stimuli. Participants were instructed to search for a target face indicated by a dot and to respond to the dot's position. In this design, the emotional content of the face is task-irrelevant and does not need to be attended. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrate that having an angry face as the target face elicited a faster response than did the neutral target face, and when the angry face is used as a distractor, the response to the target was delayed compared to the response with no such distractor. Experiment 2 included inverted faces to decrease emotional content; results showed that inversion of the faces reduced the effect of angry faces on the search performance. When attention was cued to a specific area in Experiment 3, the effect of angry faces outside of the cued area became weaker. In conclusion, the results indicate that a task-irrelevant angry face can capture attention beyond top-down control, but this effect is modulated by the availability of attentional resources. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Neural systems for orienting attention to the location of threat signals: An event-related fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  How danger is encoded: towards a systems, cellular, and computational understanding of cognitive-emotional interactions , 1999 .

[6]  Odmar Neumann,et al.  Automatic Processing: A Review of Recent Findings and a Plea for an Old Theory , 1984 .

[7]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Caught by the evil eye : nonconscious information processing, emotion, and attention to facial stimuli , 2005 .

[10]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces , 2002, Cognition & emotion.

[11]  G. Crombez,et al.  Attention for emotional faces under restricted awareness revisited: do emotional faces automatically attract attention? , 2007, Emotion.

[12]  R. Dolan,et al.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala , 1998, Nature.

[13]  A. Öhman,et al.  Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions , 1994 .

[14]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  G. Alpers,et al.  Here is looking at you: emotional faces predominate in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Emotion.

[16]  H. Okon-Singer,et al.  Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. , 2007, Emotion.

[17]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Emotion and Consciousness , 2005 .

[18]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Arne Öhman,et al.  Automaticity and the Amygdala: Nonconscious Responses to Emotional Faces , 2002 .

[22]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[23]  D. Grandjean,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  J Tzelgov,et al.  Specifying the relations between automaticity and consciousness: a theoretical note. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[25]  James F. Juola,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Central, Peripheral, and Abrupt-onset Cues in Visual Attention , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  K. Mogg,et al.  Orienting of Attention to Threatening Facial Expressions Presented under Conditions of Restricted Awareness , 1999 .

[27]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Attentional capture by task-irrelevant fearful faces is revealed by the N2pc component , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[28]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[30]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. , 2007, Emotion.

[32]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  L. Pessoa.  To what extent are emotional visual stimuli processed without attention and awareness? , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[35]  A. Anderson,et al.  Neural Correlates of the Automatic Processing of Threat Facial Signals , 2022 .

[36]  Thomas M. Moerland,et al.  Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[37]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of spatial orienting towards angry faces: A source localization study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  F. McGlone,et al.  The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: An ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  A. Öhman,et al.  Pavlovian Conditioning to Social Stimuli: Backward Masking and the Dissociation of Implicit and Expl , 1997 .