Using a model distinguishing local, national, inter-national, transnational and global interaction networks, I analyse four supposed 'threats' to nation-states-global capitalism, environmental danger, identity politics and post-nuclear geopolitics. All four actually impact differently on nationstates in different regions, contain both state-weakening and strengthening tendencies, and increase the significance of inter-national as well as transnational networks. Capitalist transformation is slightly weakening the nation-states of the north (most clearly so within the EU), yet economic development would strengthen southern nation-states. The decline of 'hard geopolitics' in a post-nuclear age weakens northern, but not most southern, states. Yet 'soft geopolitics' is everywhere bringing new state functions and maintaining the strength of inter-national networks. Identity politics, contrary to most views, probably strengthens nationally bound politics. These patterns are too varied to permit us to argue simpl...
[1]
D. Harvey,et al.
The Condition of Postmodernity
,
2020,
The New Social Theory Reader.
[2]
J. Urry,et al.
Economies of signs and space
,
1994
.
[3]
Linda Weiss,et al.
Governed Interdependence: Rethinking the Government-Business Relationship In East Asia
,
1995
.
[4]
Mike Featherstone,et al.
Global Culture: An Introduction
,
1990
.
[5]
M. Castells.
The Informational Economy and the New International Division of Labor
,
1993
.
[6]
P. Sunley.
States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis
,
1997
.
[7]
John M. Hobson,et al.
States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis
,
1995
.
[8]
M. Mann.
Nation-states in Europe and other continents: diversifying, developing, not dying
,
1993
.
[9]
A. Giddens.
The consequences of modernity
,
1990
.