Qualitative Heuristics For Balancing the Pros and Cons

Balancing the pros and cons of two options is undoubtedly a very appealing decision procedure, but one that has received scarce scientific attention so far, either formally or empirically. We describe a formal framework for pros and cons decisions, where the arguments under consideration can be of varying importance, but whose importance cannot be precisely quantified. We then define eight heuristics for balancing these pros and cons, and compare the predictions of these to the choices made by 62 human participants on a selection of 33 situations. The Levelwise Tallying heuristic clearly emerges as a winner in this competition. Further refinements of this heuristic are considered in the discussion, as well as its relation to Take the Best and Cumulative Prospect Theory.

[1]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[4]  Iver Mysterud,et al.  Take the best , 2000 .

[5]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy , 2006 .

[6]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[8]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibilistic logic : a retrospective and prospective view , 2003 .

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[10]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way , 2002 .

[11]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions , 1993 .

[12]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Qualitative Decision Making with Bipolar Information , 2006, KR.

[13]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias , 2005 .

[14]  A. Bröder,et al.  Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  A. Bröder.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Refinements of the maximin approach to decision-making in a fuzzy environment , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  B. Newell,et al.  Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone "takes-the-best" , 2003 .

[18]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[21]  Didier Dubois,et al.  On the Qualitative Comparison of Sets of Positive and Negative Affects , 2005, ECSQARU.

[22]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[23]  B. Newell,et al.  Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[25]  Abraham Wald,et al.  Statistical Decision Functions , 1951 .

[26]  U. Hoffrage,et al.  Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison , 2002 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[28]  Henri Prade,et al.  An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision , 2005, ECSQARU.

[29]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: Representation, fusion and optimal solutions , 2006, Inf. Fusion.

[30]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell? , 1999 .

[31]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment , 1993, IJCAI.