Projected Performance of InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Dot Solar Cells: Effects of Cap and Passivation Layers

In this work, the effects of Al<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>Ga<sub>1–<italic>x</italic></sub>As cap and passivation (such as SiO<sub>2</sub>, Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>, and HfO<sub>2</sub>) layers on the performance of InGaAs/GaAs-based quantum dot intermediate band solar cells (QDIBSCs) have been studied. The low surface recombination rate of ~10<sup>3</sup> per cm<sup>3</sup>s is achieved by optimizing the composition, <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x =0.40$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and thickness (200 nm) of the Al<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>Ga<sub>1–<italic>x</italic></sub>As cap layer. The optical reflectance is also evaluated for devices with different passivation. The solar cell with Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> shows the lowest reflectance of 10.53%. The photogeneration rate has been enhanced at the quantum dot region because of the improvement of the photocurrent provides by both cap and passivation layers. There is also an increment found in the average external quantum efficiency of 39.56% as compared to that of the bared conventional QDIBSC. As a result, the solar cell, with both Al<sub>0.40</sub>Ga<sub>0.60</sub>As cap and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> passivation layers, shows the conversion efficiency of 27.8%, which is higher than that of 21.6% for conventional In<sub>0.53</sub>Ga<sub>0.47</sub>AS/GaAs-based QDIBSC. These results indicate that GaAs-based QDIBSCs with both Al<sub>0.40</sub>Ga<sub>0.60</sub>As cap and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> passivation layers are promising for next-generation photovoltaic applications.

[1]  Md. Tanvir Hasan,et al.  InxGa1−xAs/GaAs-based intermediate band solar cell: Effects of quantum dots , 2016, 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON).

[2]  Dong Liu,et al.  AlGaAs/Si dual‐junction tandem solar cells by epitaxial lift‐off and print‐transfer‐assisted direct bonding , 2018 .

[3]  Miro Zeman,et al.  Design and application of ion-implanted polySi passivating contacts for interdigitated back contact c-Si solar cells , 2016 .

[4]  Adel Asselman,et al.  The Design and Optimization of GaAs Single Solar Cells Using the Genetic Algorithm and Silvaco ATLAS , 2017 .

[5]  Bryce S. Richards,et al.  Single-material TiO2 double-layer antireflection coatings , 2003 .

[6]  Chennupati Jagadish,et al.  The role of intersubband optical transitions on the electrical properties of InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells , 2013 .

[7]  S. Glunz,et al.  SiO2 surface passivation layers – a key technology for silicon solar cells , 2018, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.

[8]  Miroslav Mikolášek,et al.  Electrophysical Properties of GaAs P–I–N Structures for Concentrator Solar Cell Applications , 2016 .

[9]  Arturo Morales-Acevedo,et al.  Design of AlxGa1−xAs/GaAs/InyGa1−yAs triple junction solar cells with anti-reflective coating , 2015 .

[10]  Euijoon Yoon,et al.  Anomalous strain relaxation and light‐hole character enhancement in GaAs capped InAs/In0.53Ga0.47As quantum ring , 2009 .

[11]  Peter Engelhart,et al.  International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic ( ITRPV ) 2017 Results , 2014 .

[12]  Fernando Ponce,et al.  Effect of capping procedure on quantum dot morphology: Implications on optical properties and efficiency of InAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells , 2018 .

[13]  Alexander A. Balandin,et al.  Miniband formation in a quantum dot crystal , 2001 .

[14]  Stephen R. Forrest,et al.  Thermodynamic limits of quantum photovoltaic cell efficiency , 2007 .

[15]  Ajeet Rohatgi,et al.  Screen printed, large area bifacial N-type back junction silicon solar cells with selective phosphorus front surface field and boron doped poly-Si/SiOx passivated rear emitter , 2018, Applied Physics Letters.

[16]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26% , 2017, Nature Energy.

[17]  Yasuhiko Arakawa,et al.  Fabrication of InAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells with enhanced photocurrent and without degradation of open circuit voltage , 2010 .

[18]  A. Luque,et al.  Increasing the Efficiency of Ideal Solar Cells by Photon Induced Transitions at Intermediate Levels , 1997 .

[19]  K. Watanabe,et al.  Photoabsorption improvement in multi-stacked InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cell with a light scattering rear texture , 2020 .

[20]  Christopher G. Bailey,et al.  Open-Circuit Voltage Improvement of InAs/GaAs Quantum-Dot Solar Cells Using Reduced InAs Coverage , 2011, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[21]  Xuesong Lu,et al.  Improving GaP Solar Cell Performance by Passivating the Surface Using AlxGa1-xP Epi-Layer , 2013, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society.

[22]  Sayak Bhattacharya,et al.  Beyond 30% Conversion Efficiency in Silicon Solar Cells: A Numerical Demonstration , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Yoshinobu Okano,et al.  Ultra-high stacks of InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots for high efficiency solar cells , 2012 .

[24]  Md. Tanvir Hasan,et al.  The Effects of Interdot Spacing and Dot Size on the Performance of InGaAs/GaAs QDIBSC , 2017 .

[25]  Yongho Seo,et al.  Effect of additional HfO2 layer deposition on heterojunction c‐Si solar cells , 2018, Energy Science & Engineering.

[26]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Influence of SiOx film thickness on electrical performance and efficiency of TOPCon solar cells , 2020 .

[27]  Kelsey A. W. Horowitz,et al.  Raising the one-sun conversion efficiency of III–V/Si solar cells to 32.8% for two junctions and 35.9% for three junctions , 2017, Nature Energy.

[28]  Robert Margolis,et al.  Q4 2019/Q1 2020 Solar Industry Update , 2020 .

[29]  Yoshitaka Okada,et al.  Spectrally resolved intraband transitions on two-step photon absorption in InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cell , 2014 .

[30]  Aniruddha Kushwaha,et al.  Optimization of p-GaN/InGaN/n-GaN Double Heterojunction p-i-n Solar Cell for High Efficiency: Simulation Approach , 2014 .

[31]  Marta Victoria,et al.  Characterization of the spatial distribution of irradiance and spectrum in concentrating photovoltaic systems and their effect on multi‐junction solar cells , 2013 .

[32]  Andrew Blakers,et al.  Impact of Al Doping on Surface Passivation of TiOx on Si , 2020, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[33]  Suleyman Ozcelik,et al.  Effect of single-layer Ta2O5 and double-layer SiO2/Ta2O5 anti-reflective coatings on GaInP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell performance , 2019, Journal of Alloys and Compounds.