The Effect of Spatial Elevation on Respect Depends on Merit and Medium

Five experiments investigated the effects of spatial elevation on person perception in both a computer setup and actual encounters, determining the moderating role of additional verbal information about the target. In accordance with prior findings, spatial elevation increased respect in a computer setting, especially when the target was described as nonachieving. Liking toward the target was not affected. In an actual encounter the results were reversed: When actually facing the target, spatial elevation decreased respect when it was not legitimized by achievements of the target. We discuss the implications of our findings for the elicitation of respect and experimental approaches to investigate it.

[1]  D. Lakens,et al.  But for the bad, there would not be good: Grounding valence in brightness through shared relational structures. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Sam J. Maglio,et al.  Disembodiment: abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Sascha Topolinski.  The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  D. Lakens,et al.  Why Your Highness Needs the People Comparing the Absolute and Relative Representation of Power in Vertical Space , 2011 .

[5]  Marcel Brass,et al.  When Pinocchio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Big and Mighty: Preverbal Infants Mentally Represent Social Dominance , 2011, Science.

[7]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  Moving the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Psychological science.

[8]  A. Fiske,et al.  Differently embodying different relationships , 2009 .

[9]  A. Abele,et al.  Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency , 2009 .

[10]  Catrin Misselhorn,et al.  Empathy with Inanimate Objects and the Uncanny Valley , 2009, Minds and Machines.

[11]  Thomas W. Schubert.  A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling , 2009 .

[12]  S. Gosling,et al.  Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One's Status in a Group , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders' Power are Interrelated , 2007 .

[15]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Dirk P. Janssen,et al.  Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition , 2007, Psychological science.

[17]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Thomas W. Schubert.  Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Morality and competence in person- and self-perception , 2005 .

[20]  Kai Epstude,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES The Ups and Downs of Social Comparison: Mechanisms of Assimilation and Contrast , 2022 .

[21]  A. Fiske.  Relational Models Theory 2.0. , 2004 .

[22]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  The Power in Your Hand: Gender Differences in Bodily Feedback From Making a Fist , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[23]  T. Mussweiler.  Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[24]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[25]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Female Authority , 2000 .

[26]  F. Strack,et al.  The "relative self": informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Burgoon.  Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication , 1993 .

[29]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[30]  Sue Boney McCoy,et al.  Self-esteem, similarity, and reactions to active versus passive downward comparison , 1991 .

[31]  C. Carver,et al.  Self-directed attention and the comparison of self with standards , 1983 .

[32]  Barry Schwartz,et al.  Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. , 1982 .

[33]  P. Machotka,et al.  Messages of the Body , 1976 .

[34]  A. Fiske,et al.  How to relate to people: The extraterrestrial’s guide to Homo sapiens. , 2012 .

[35]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  More than a metaphor: How the understanding of power is grounded in experience , 2011 .

[36]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact , 2008 .

[37]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: Spatial Cognition , 2008 .

[38]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social relationships in our species and cultures. , 2007 .

[39]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[40]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical model , 1976 .