The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation

[1]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren't Available , 2012 .

[2]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number? , 2012 .

[3]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods , 2012 .

[4]  K. Train,et al.  An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales , 2012 .

[5]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History , 2012 .

[6]  W. J. Wheeler,et al.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Valuation of Surface Water Quality Improvements , 2012, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[7]  José G. Borges,et al.  Assessing forest management strategies using a contingent valuation approach and advanced visualisation techniques: a portuguese case study , 2011 .

[8]  A. Alberini,et al.  Implications of Bid Design and Willingness-To-Pay Distribution for Starting Point Bias in Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys , 2011 .

[9]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Combining spatial modeling and choice experiments for the optimal spatial allocation of wind turbines , 2011 .

[10]  R. Carson,et al.  15 Incentive and information properties of preference questions: commentary and extensions , 2011 .

[11]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches , 2011 .

[12]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Economic values of species management options in human-wildlife conflicts: Hen Harriers in Scotland. , 2010 .

[13]  J. List,et al.  A Dynamic Explanation of the Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Disparity , 2010 .

[14]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay , 2010 .

[15]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Context and the VSL: Evidence from a Stated Preference Study in Italy and the Czech Republic , 2010 .

[16]  David Hoyos,et al.  The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments , 2010 .

[17]  O. Frör,et al.  The Economic Value of Improved Wastewater Irrigation: A Contingent Valuation Study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia , 2009 .

[18]  C. Kling,et al.  Welfare Measures When Agents Can Learn: A Unifying Theory , 2009 .

[19]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods , 2009 .

[20]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation , 2009 .

[21]  C. Throsby THE MEASUREMENT OF WILLINGNESS‐TO‐PAY FOR MIXED GOODS* , 2009 .

[22]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change , 2009 .

[23]  Yan Wang,et al.  Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji'nan, China. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  J. Louviere,et al.  Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best-worst choice , 2008 .

[25]  Nabin Baral,et al.  Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. , 2008 .

[26]  S. Mourato,et al.  Are We Willing to Pay Enough to `Back the Bid'?: Valuing the Intangible Impacts of London's Bid to Host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games , 2008 .

[27]  M. Sagoff,et al.  The Economy of the Earth: The Allocation and Distribution of Resources , 2007 .

[28]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[29]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum , 2006 .

[30]  Bryan J. Hubbell,et al.  An Empirical Bayes Approach to Combining and Comparing Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life for Environmental Policy Analysis , 2006 .

[31]  W. Greene,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[32]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation , 2005 .

[33]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Willingness-To-Pay, Compensating Variation, and the Cost of Commitment , 2004 .

[34]  B. Wansink,et al.  Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design -- For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires , 2004 .

[35]  Otha Linton,et al.  The federal register , 2003 .

[36]  J. Herriges,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations , 2003 .

[37]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[38]  R. Kopp,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 2003 .

[39]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations , 2003 .

[40]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon , 2003 .

[41]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum , 2003 .

[42]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Comment , 2003 .

[43]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[44]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques , 2002 .

[45]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2002 .

[46]  R. Barker Bausell,et al.  Power Analysis for Experimental Research: A Practical Guide for the Biological, Medical and Social Sciences , 2002 .

[47]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[48]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[49]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  On Designing Constructed Markets in Valuation Surveys , 2002 .

[50]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Improving the Performance of Contingent Valuation Studies in Developing Countries , 2002 .

[51]  Ståle Navrud,et al.  Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. , 2002 .

[52]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  The Theory and Measurement of Passive‐Use Value , 2001 .

[53]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Alternatives to the Neo‐Classical Theory of Choice , 2001 .

[54]  P. Corso,et al.  Valuing Mortality-Risk Reduction: Using Visual Aids to Improve the Validity of Contingent Valuation , 2001 .

[55]  K. McConnell,et al.  A Review of Wta/Wtp Studies , 2000 .

[56]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[57]  D. Hensher,et al.  Combining sources of preference data , 2000 .

[58]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Using meta‐analysis for benefit transfer: In‐sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database , 2000 .

[59]  L. Rips,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2000 .

[60]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[61]  Winston Harrington,et al.  On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates , 2000 .

[62]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys , 1999 .

[63]  Charles D. Kolstad,et al.  Information and the Divergence between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay , 1999 .

[64]  W. Hutchinson,et al.  Some Further Implications of Incorporating the Warm Glow of Giving into Welfare Measures: A Comment on the Use of Donation Mechanisms by Champet al. , 1999 .

[65]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods , 1998 .

[66]  K. Rollins,et al.  The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values , 1998 .

[67]  A. Randall Beyond the crucial experiment: mapping the performance characteristics of contingent valuation , 1998 .

[68]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[69]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[70]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[71]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  The Relationship between the Income Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay , 1997 .

[72]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[73]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Does Part-Whole Bias Exist? An Experimental Investigation , 1997 .

[74]  T. Cameron,et al.  Welfare effects of changes in environmental quality under individual uncertainty about use , 1997 .

[75]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data , 1997 .

[76]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[77]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1996 .

[78]  R. Carson,et al.  Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1995 .

[79]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Social Choice , 1994 .

[80]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[81]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[82]  R. Carson,et al.  Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone , 1994 .

[83]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[84]  John Mackenzie,et al.  A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models , 1993 .

[85]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .

[86]  R. Carson,et al.  The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water , 1993 .

[87]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[88]  P. Madden A Generalization of Hicksian q Substitutes and Complements with Application to Demand Rationing , 1991 .

[89]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications , 1991 .

[90]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[91]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions , 1990 .

[92]  Jack L. Knetsch,et al.  Environmental policy implications of disparities between willingness to pay and compensation demanded measures of values , 1990 .

[93]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  A discrete choice contingent valuation estimate of the value of Kenai King salmon , 1990 .

[94]  J. Andreoni Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[95]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. , 1989 .

[96]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data , 1989 .

[97]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[98]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression' , 1988 .

[99]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[100]  Alan Randall,et al.  A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation , 1987 .

[101]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[102]  William J. Infosino,et al.  Forecasting New Product Sales from Likelihood of Purchase Ratings , 1986 .

[103]  Wesley D. Seitz,et al.  Measuring Water Quality Benefits , 1986 .

[104]  David A. Hensher,et al.  VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS. A DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1985 .

[105]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[106]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality , 1985 .

[107]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[108]  W. Hanemann Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[109]  Randall G. Chapaaan,et al.  Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility Model , 1982 .

[110]  M. Thayer Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: Further evidence , 1981 .

[111]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[112]  Daniel A. Graham,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Uncertainty , 1977 .

[113]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[114]  M. Satterthwaite Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .

[115]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Predicting the evaluation of real stimulus objects from abstract evaluation of their attributes: The case of trout streams. , 1974 .

[116]  Berry Ives,et al.  Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements , 1974 .

[117]  K. Arrow,et al.  Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility , 1974 .

[118]  A. Deaton,et al.  The Analysis of Consumer Demand in the United Kingdom, 1900-1970 , 1974 .

[119]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[120]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Economics of outdoor recreation , 1969 .

[121]  Sidney C. Sufrin Book Review: Organizational Behavior: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1966 .

[122]  Jack Hirshleifer,et al.  Investment Decision Under Uncertainty: Applications of the State-Preference Approach , 1966 .

[123]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[124]  Jack Hirshleifer,et al.  Investment Decision under Uncertainty: Choice—Theoretic Approaches , 1965 .

[125]  B. Weisbrod,et al.  Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods , 1964 .

[126]  P. Samuelson The Pure Theory of Public Expanditure , 1954 .

[127]  S. Ciriacy-Wantrup,et al.  Capital Returns from Soil-Conservation Practices , 1947 .

[128]  H. Bowen,et al.  The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources , 1943 .

[129]  John Hicks,et al.  The Four Consumer's Surpluses , 1943 .

[130]  W. Wallis The Theory of Voting , 2012 .

[131]  J. Bai,et al.  Chinese Consumers' Demand for Food Safety Attributes: A Push for Government and Industry Regulations , 2012 .

[132]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies , 2012 .

[133]  A. Longo,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .

[134]  Zapata Raudales,et al.  Three Essays on Contingent Valuation , 2012 .

[135]  B. Kanninen,et al.  Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies : a common sense approach to theory and practice , 2010 .

[136]  J. Louviere,et al.  Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis , 2010 .

[137]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[138]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space , 2005 .

[139]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation , 2005 .

[140]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity , 2004 .

[141]  Elizabeth Martin,et al.  METHODS FOR TESTING AND EVALUATING SURVEY QUESTIONS , 2004 .

[142]  I. Bateman Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[143]  Bruce G. Terrell The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , 2002 .

[144]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[145]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Travel behaviour research : the leading edge , 2001 .

[146]  R. Kling,et al.  ESTIMATING THE PUBLIC GOOD VALUE OF PRESERVING A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK : THE ROLE OF NON-SUBSTITUTABILITY AND INFORMATION IN CONTINGENT VALUATION , 2001 .

[147]  Daniel L. Rubinfeld,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies : Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods , 1997 .

[148]  R. Kopp,et al.  Constructing Measures of Economic Value , 1997 .

[149]  R. Cornes,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods: Externalities and private information , 1996 .

[150]  J. Conlisk Why Bounded Rationality , 1996 .

[151]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[152]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA , 1996 .

[153]  R. Carson AND TESTS OF INSENSITIVITY TO SCOPE , 1995 .

[154]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[155]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[156]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[157]  Banco Mundial The demand for water in rural areas: determinants and policy implications. , 1993, The World Bank research observer.

[158]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[159]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability , 1993 .

[160]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods , 1992 .

[161]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[162]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[163]  James P. Lodge,et al.  Visibility and fine particles , 1991 .

[164]  K. McConnell Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation , 1990 .

[165]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[166]  Jon Strand,et al.  Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment , 1990 .

[167]  Alan Randall,et al.  Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit-Cost Test: Reply , 1989 .

[168]  D. Mueller Public choice II , 1989 .

[169]  David A. Starrett,et al.  Foundations of public economics: Contents , 1988 .

[170]  J. Turner A theory of social interaction , 1988 .

[171]  J. Dixon,et al.  Information Disclosure and Endangered Species Valuation , 1985 .

[172]  R. G. Walsh,et al.  Wild and scenic river economics: recreation use and preservation values , 1985 .

[173]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness. , 1983 .

[174]  J. Conley Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design , 1983 .

[175]  R. Carson,et al.  An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements , 1981 .

[176]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  Sampling Approach to the Free-Rider Problem , 1978 .

[177]  Robert D. Willig,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Without Apology , 1976 .

[178]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[179]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[180]  G. Debreu,et al.  Theory of Value , 1959 .