Some non-technology implications for wider application of robots assisting older people

Assistive Technology (AT) for care of older people is now a major focus area for research, given the ageing of population and diminishing numb er of available caregivers. Robots have recently been recognized as a potential platfo rm for remote monitoring and delivering healthcare assistance to older people. A literature search was conducted to explore potential issues and lessons learnt in simi lar situations. Surprisingly, the acceptance of home care technology by older people has not been a serious problem after proper introduction and training; however important practical challenges were related to privacy, autonomy and ethical responsibility. It wa s observed that an ethical framework for AT is virtually non-existent and is needed for people who feel vulnerable in dependent situations. A further challenge that potentially im pedes AT implementation is its acceptance by the existing care giving workforce be cause of a perceived threat from technology to take away their jobs, add to their re sponsibilities and make them vulnerable to consequences borne out of a recorded human error . Aged Care Facility managers, caregivers and medical professionals have concerns, including: practical workflow adjustment, equipment maintenance, accuracy, cost eand potential for errors. International regulatory framework is generally sup portive though variations exist across political boundaries. Using robot based AT solution s for elder care is desirable, and represents a promising technology option, but we mu st consider several non-technical implications before designing solutions.

[1]  D W Young What Makes Doctors Use Computers?: Discussion Paper , 1984 .

[2]  Sabine Koch Meeting the Challenges - the Role of Medical Informatics in an Ageing Society , 2006, MIE.

[3]  Mikael Collan,et al.  IT and institutional constraints: effects of legal and administrative constraints to use it in production of health care services - focus on Finland , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Diane Gibson,et al.  Aged Care: Old Policies, New Problems , 1998 .

[5]  N. Treister Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. , 1998, Physician executive.

[6]  Richard E. Scott,et al.  Access and authorisation in a Glocal e-Health Policy context , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  S. Brownsell,et al.  Assistive technology and telecare: Forging solutions for independent living , 2003 .

[8]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Why Don't Physicians Use Their Personal Digital Assistants? , 2003, AMIA.

[9]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating the Adoption of Enterprise Application Integration in Health-Care Organizations , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Fay Cobb Payton,et al.  Lessons learned from three interorganizational health care information systems , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Sumio Murase,et al.  Distribution of telemedicine in Japan. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence, Employment, and Income , 1984, AI Mag..

[13]  J. Barlow,et al.  A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people , 2002, Assets '02.

[15]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[16]  Guy Lories Intelligent behaviour in animals and robots - McFarland,D, Bosser,T , 1996 .

[17]  G. Hartvigsen,et al.  Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  F Welsh Informatics: a physician's view. , 1997, Journal of health care finance.

[19]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field : . , 2000 .

[21]  Mélodie Boulay,et al.  Caregivers' requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. , 2009, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[22]  Karen Day,et al.  Supporting information technology across health boards in New Zealand: the role of learning in adapting to complex change , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[23]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  The Ethics of Enabling Technology , 2007, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[25]  Donald D. Tippett,et al.  The “death valley” of change , 2002 .

[26]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies , 2000, CUU '00.

[27]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Epidemiology of aging. , 2008, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[28]  H. Corriveau,et al.  A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  Kathryn H. Bowles,et al.  Applying Research Evidence to Optimize Telehomecare , 2007, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[30]  J. P. Kichak,et al.  Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful? , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[31]  P. Lehoux,et al.  The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[32]  Marr Tj The Piñata syndrome. , 1998 .

[33]  H. Yanco,et al.  Automation as Caregiver: A Survey of Issues and Technologies , 2003 .

[34]  A R Bakker,et al.  Evaluation of automated information systems in health care: an approach to classifying evaluative studies. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[35]  M. Hammer,et al.  A manifesto for business revolution , 1993 .

[36]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[37]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[38]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  R. Fazzi,et al.  Telehealth and technology in home care: part I. Insights from the Philips National Study on the Future of Technology and Telehealth in Home Care. , 2007, Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine.

[40]  K L White,et al.  Technology and health care. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Bryn Williams-Jones,et al.  Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[42]  Marvin C. Alkin,et al.  What Have We Learned? , 2019, Stumbling Blocks Against Unification.

[43]  B. Newman Robotic health care. , 2009, Optometry.

[44]  David M. Liebovitz Health care information technology: a cloud around the silver lining? , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[45]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail , 2022 .

[46]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[47]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[48]  Lennart Magnusson,et al.  A literature review study of Information and Communication Technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers , 2004 .

[49]  A. Tinker,et al.  Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: Feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[50]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[51]  Sonja Wiley-Patton,et al.  Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[52]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[53]  S. Valentine,et al.  Physicians' Adoption of Information Technology , 2001, Health marketing quarterly.

[54]  Treister Nw Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. , 1998 .

[55]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[56]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.