Deep learning for segmentation of 49 selected bones in CT scans: First step in automated PET/CT-based 3D quantification of skeletal metastases.

[1]  Eliot L Siegel,et al.  Reinventing Radiology: Big Data and the Future of Medical Imaging , 2018, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[2]  K. Dreyer,et al.  When Machines Think: Radiology's Next Frontier. , 2017, Radiology.

[3]  Hao Chen,et al.  3D deeply supervised network for automated segmentation of volumetric medical images , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Yongsheng Song,et al.  Prognostic value of bone scan index as an imaging biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis , 2017, Oncotarget.

[5]  Jens Eickhoff,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Early [18F]Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response to Treatment in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Bone. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  B. Erickson,et al.  Machine Learning for Medical Imaging. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  F. Kahl,et al.  3D skeletal uptake of 18F sodium fluoride in PET/CT images is associated with overall survival in patients with prostate cancer , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[8]  F. Kahl,et al.  3D skeletal uptake of 18F sodium fluoride in PET/CT images is associated with overall survival in patients with prostate cancer , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[9]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Determination of Skeletal Tumor Burden on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  P. Fox,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[13]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  M. H. Poulsen,et al.  Spine metastases in prostate cancer: comparison of technetium‐99m‐MDP whole‐body bone scintigraphy, [18F]choline positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography (CT) and [18F]NaF PET/CT , 2014, BJU international.

[15]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , 2014, ECCV.

[16]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the Bone Scan Index. , 2012, European urology.

[17]  Changyin Wang,et al.  Study on the distribution features of bone metastases in prostate cancer , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[18]  Neeraj Sharma,et al.  Automated medical image segmentation techniques , 2010, Journal of medical physics.

[19]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Lars Edenbrandt,et al.  Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations—a nationwide survey , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[22]  S M Larson,et al.  A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: the Bone Scan Index. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[23]  L. R. Dice.  Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .