Imaging , Diagnosis , Prognosis A Phase I Study of a 2-Day Lapatinib Chemosensitization Pulse Preceding Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel for Advanced Solid Malignancies

Purpose: Systemic chemotherapy fails to access much of the tumor burden in patients with advanced cancer, significantly limiting its efficacy. In preclinical studies, brief high doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family can prime tumor vasculature for optimal chemotherapeutic delivery and efficacy. This study investigates the clinical relevance of this approach. Experimental Design: A phase I clinical study of escalating doses of the HER TKI lapatinib given as a 2-day pulse before a weekly infusion of nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m) was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Results: Twenty-five patients were treated. Treatment was associated with grade 1 to 2 toxicities including diarrhea, nausea, rash, neutropenia, neuropathy, fatigue, alopecia, and anemia. The two dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 vomiting and grade 4 neutropenia, and the maximum tolerated dose of lapatinib was defined as 5250 mg/day in divided doses. Lapatinib concentrations increased with increasing dose. Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging studies in a subset of patients confirmed a decrease in tumor vascular permeability immediately following a lapatinib pulse. Sixty-five percent of evaluable patients experienced a partial or stable response on this therapy, 72% of whom were previously taxane-refractory. Conclusion: A 2-day pulse of high-dose lapatinib given before weekly nab-paclitaxel is a feasible and tolerable clinical regimen, suitable for testing this novel vascular-priming chemosensitization hypothesis developed in preclinical models. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5569–75) One of the significant barriers to the highly effective treatment of patients with metastatic cancer is the failure of chemotherapeutic agents to efficiently reach all the tumor cells and produce their cytotoxic effects on a significant fraction of the whole tumor burden. The lack of access to much of the disease is due to highly abnormal tumor vasculature, characterized by high permeability and very poor architecture resulting in tissue hypertension, hypoxia, acidosis, and absence of osmotic gradients resulting in poor exchange of nutrients and drugs (1). One of the principal challenges in clinical cancer research is to understand the mechanisms underlying this therapeutic barrier and develop adjunctive therapies to overcome it. Measurable progress has been made with therapies that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway. The effects of this class of agents on tumor vasculature have been mechanistically defined in preclinical models (2, 3) and their ability to enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy validated in a number of clinical studies (4–6). A role for other vascular targets remains to be defined. The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family of receptor tyrosine kinases are important drivers of tumor endothelial signaling, in particular phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway activation (7–10). Upstream signals that activate HER family signaling in tumor endothelial cells include paracrine signaling (11, 12), autocrine signaling (13), and cross-talk from G-protein–coupled receptor activation (14). In preclinical Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Medicine, Obstetrics,Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Dermatology, Radiology, Biopharmaceutical Sciences, and Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California SanFrancisco, SanFrancisco, California and Clinical PharmacologyModeling and Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Received 2/27/09; revised 6/25/09; accepted 7/18/09; published OnlineFirst 8/25/09. Grant support: University of California at San Francisco Hellen Diller ComprehensiveCancerCenter,Atwater Foundation.A.J.Chien is supportedbyanAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award and an American Cancer Society postdoctoral fellowship. M.M.Moasser is supported by the NIH. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Requests for reprints: Mark M. Moasser, Helen Diller Comprehensive CancerCenter,UniversityofCalifornia, SanFrancisco,Box0875,SanFrancisco, CA 94143-0875. Phone: 415-476-0158; Fax; 415-353-7692; E-mail: mmoasser@ medicine.ucsf.edu. F 2009 American Association for Cancer Research. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0522 5569 Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17) September 1, 2009 www.aacrjournals.org Research. on May 3, 2017. © 2009 American Association for Cancer clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from Published OnlineFirst August 25, 2009; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0522

[1]  Chiung-Nien Chen,et al.  Lysophosphatidic acid upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor-C and tube formation in human endothelial cells through LPA(1/3), COX-2, and NF-kappaB activation- and EGFR transactivation-dependent mechanisms. , 2008, Cellular signalling.

[2]  H. Gómez,et al.  Efficacy and safety of lapatinib as first-line therapy for ErbB2-amplified locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Patricia M. LoRusso,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lapatinib and docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  I. Fidler,et al.  Phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor on tumor-associated endothelial cells is a primary target for therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2008, Neoplasia.

[5]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  I. Fidler,et al.  Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor phosphorylation on tumor-associated endothelial cells leads to treatment of orthotopic human colon cancer in nude mice. , 2007, Neoplasia.

[7]  N. Hylton,et al.  Improved tumor vascular function following high‐dose epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  V. Mehta,et al.  HB-EGF promotes angiogenesis in endothelial cells via PI3-kinase and MAPK signaling pathways , 2007, Growth factors.

[9]  M. Kris,et al.  A phase I trial of intermittent high-dose gefitinib and fixed-dose docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors , 2007, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[10]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Dhara N. Amin,et al.  Tumor endothelial cells express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) but not ErbB3 and are responsive to EGF and to EGFR kinase inhibitors. , 2006, Cancer research.

[12]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Autocrine EGF receptor activation mediates endothelial cell migration and vascular morphogenesis induced by VEGF under interstitial flow. , 2005, Experimental cell research.

[13]  Neil Desai,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetics trial of ABI-007, a novel nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Au,et al.  Formulating Paclitaxel in Nanoparticles Alters Its Disposition , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[15]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Jain Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[17]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Vascular Normalization by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade Induces a Pressure Gradient Across the Vasculature and Improves Drug Penetration in Tumors , 2004, Cancer Research.

[18]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[21]  K. Koch,et al.  Increasing throughput of parallel on-line extraction liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry system for GLP quantitative bioanalysis in drug development. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[22]  Atle Bjørnerud,et al.  Quantification of breast tumor microvascular permeability with feruglose-enhanced MR imaging: initial phase II multicenter trial. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  David A. Smith,et al.  559 Pharmacokinetics of GW572016 in an ascending dose tolerability study of phase I cancer patients , 2003 .

[24]  C. Bucana,et al.  Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling on tumor cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells for therapy of human carcinomas. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[25]  I. Shiojima,et al.  Role of Akt Signaling in Vascular Homeostasis and Angiogenesis , 2002, Circulation research.

[26]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  J. Schellens,et al.  Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  J. Au,et al.  Cremophor reduces paclitaxel penetration into bladder wall during intravesical treatment , 1999, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[29]  J Verweij,et al.  Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. , 1999, Cancer research.

[30]  R Simon,et al.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  J. Beijnen,et al.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in mice results from the pharmaceutical vehicle Cremophor EL. , 1996, Cancer research.