Quantifying joint blood flow in a rat model of rheumatoid arthritis with dynamic contrast-enhanced near-infrared spectroscopy

The current standard of care for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves early use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Nevertheless, 30% of RA patients still fail their first DMARD and it takes 3–6 months to detect treatment failure with current monitoring methods; this places patients at a higher risk of irreversible joint damage. We previously developed a dynamic contrast-enhanced time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy technique (DCE TR-NIRS) for quantifying joint blood flow (BF). We now aim to investigate whether joint BF, as measured with DCE TR-NIRS, can be used to monitor disease activity and treatment response in a rat model of RA. Arthritis was induced in 4 adult male Lewis rats using the well-established adjuvant-induced arthritis model. Baseline measurements were acquired prior to adjuvant injection on day 0. Arthritis progressed until day 20 (“Pre-treatment” phase), after which rats received DMARD treatment (Enbrel®: 0.5 ml/kg; intramuscular injection) once every 5 days (“Treatment” phase). Starting on day 0, ankle joint BF was measured every 5 days until the end of the study on day 40. Mean rat ankle joint BF (mL/min/100g) increased from 7.94±3.71 at baseline to 15.77±4.58 during the Pre-treatment phase. Following treatment, mean joint BF decreased to 12.15±1.82 mL/min/100g. This is an ongoing study and the preliminary results shown here suggest that joint BF measured with DCE TR-NIRS is sensitive to RA disease activity and could detect response to treatment.

[1]  Jeffrey R Curtis,et al.  A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  D. Walsh,et al.  Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2012, Current Pain and Headache Reports.

[4]  Charles King,et al.  2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2016, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[5]  P. Varlet,et al.  Optical properties, spectral, and lifetime measurements of central nervous system tumors in humans , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  R. Caporali,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis treatment: the earlier the better to prevent joint damage , 2015, RMD Open.

[7]  Jeffrey R Curtis,et al.  2012 Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis , 2012, Arthritis care & research.

[8]  M. Hotopf,et al.  The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on quality-of-life assessed using the SF-36: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  R. Craen,et al.  Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  M. Uffmann,et al.  Very recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and serological patient characteristics associated with radiographic progression over the first years of disease. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[11]  A. Bendele,et al.  Animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[12]  E. Choy,et al.  Fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis reflects pain, not disease activity. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[13]  Laura B. Morrison,et al.  Joint blood flow is more sensitive to inflammatory arthritis than oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, and oxygen saturation. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[14]  J. Smolen,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review , 2018, JAMA.