Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of Crash Prediction Models

Traditional crash prediction models, such as generalized linear regression models, are incapable of taking into account the multilevel data structure, which extensively exists in crash data. Disregarding the possible within-group correlations can lead to the production of models giving unreliable and biased estimates of unknowns. This study innovatively proposes a 5*T-level hierarchy, viz. (Geographic region level ¨C Traffic site level ¨C Traffic crash level ¨C Driver-vehicle unit level ¨C Vehicle-occupant level) Time level, to establish a general form of multilevel data structure in traffic safety analysis. To properly model the potential cross-group heterogeneity due to the multilevel data structure, a framework of Bayesian hierarchical models that explicitly specify multilevel structure and correctly yield parameter estimates is introduced and recommended. The proposed method is illustrated in an individual-severity analysis of intersection crashes using the Singapore crash records. This study proved the importance of accounting for the within-group correlations and demonstrated the flexibilities and effectiveness of the Bayesian hierarchical method in modeling multilevel structure of traffic crash data.

[1]  C J O'Donnell,et al.  Predicting the severity of motor vehicle accident injuries using models of ordered multiple choice. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Cletus R. Mercier,et al.  Age and Gender as Predictors of Injury Severity in Head-on Highway Vehicular Collisions , 1997 .

[3]  M. Abdel-Aty,et al.  Linking Roadway Geometrics and Real-Time Traffic Characteristics to Model Daytime Freeway Crashes: Generalized Estimating Equations for Correlated Data , 2004 .

[4]  H Lum,et al.  Modeling vehicle accidents and highway geometric design relationships. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  An exploratory multinomial logit analysis of single-vehicle motorcycle accident severity , 1996 .

[6]  Y Page,et al.  A Bayesian Neural Network approach to estimating the Energy Equivalent Speed. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Andrew P Jones,et al.  The use of multilevel models for the prediction of road accident outcomes. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Simon Washington,et al.  Modeling crash outcome probabilities at rural intersections: application of hierarchical binomial logistic models. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  A. S. Al-Ghamdi.  Using logistic regression to estimate the influence of accident factors on accident severity. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring the overall and specific crash severity levels at signalized intersections. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Yuanchang Xie,et al.  Predicting motor vehicle collisions using Bayesian neural network models: an empirical analysis. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  F Mannering,et al.  Analysis of the frequency and duration of freeway accidents in Seattle. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Jutaek Oh,et al.  Bayesian methodology incorporating expert judgment for ranking countermeasure effectiveness under uncertainty: example applied to at grade railroad crossings in Korea. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Negative binomial analysis of intersection accident frequencies , 1996 .

[16]  Ying C MacNab,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for accident and injury surveillance. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  L Mussone,et al.  An analysis of urban collisions using an artificial intelligence model. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter of Poisson-gamma models for modeling motor vehicle crashes: a Bayesian perspective , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[20]  F L Mannering,et al.  Statistical analysis of motorcyclists' perceived accident risk. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Ahmed E. Radwan,et al.  Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Development of Artificial Neural Network Models to Predict Driver Injury Severity in Traffic Accidents at Signalized Intersections , 2001 .

[23]  Simon Washington,et al.  On the nature of over-dispersion in motor vehicle crash prediction models. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Sarath C. Joshua,et al.  Estimating truck accident rate and involvements using linear and poisson regression models , 1990 .

[25]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Accident Prediction Models With and Without Trend: Application of the Generalized Estimating Equations Procedure , 2000 .

[26]  S. Miaou.  The relationship between truck accidents and geometric design of road sections: Poisson versus negative binomial regressions. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  An analysis of motorcycle injury and vehicle damage severity using ordered probit models. , 2002, Journal of safety research.