Reading Collocations in an L2: Do Collocation Processing Benefits Extend to Non-Adjacent Collocations?

Various studies have consistently shown that collocations are processed faster than matched control phrases, both in L1 and in L2. Most of these studies focused on adjacent collocations (e.g., provide information). However, research in corpus linguistics normally uses a span to identify collocations (e.g., ± 4 words), and these non-adjacent collocations (e.g., provide some of the information) occur very frequently in language. Nevertheless, how they are processed is less established. A recent study on reading non-adjacent collocations seems to suggest similar processing advantages as for adjacent collocations (Author 2016), but this study was limited to the performance of native speakers. The present study addresses the question of whether advanced non-native speakers also show processing advantages for nonadjacent collocations as native speakers do. Forty advanced non-native speakers of English read collocations in either adjacent or non-adjacent conditions, and their eye-movements were recorded. Mixed-effects analysis of their eye-movements was carried out. The results suggest that non-native speakers read adjacent collocations faster than non-formulaic controls, but this facilitation almost disappears for non-adjacent collocations.

[1]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Laura Vilkaitė.  Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[4]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading. , 2009, Experimental Psychology.

[5]  N. Ellis.  Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning , 2006 .

[6]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions , 2013 .

[7]  S. Sonbul,et al.  Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake?: frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing , 2015 .

[8]  Anna Siyanova-Chanturia,et al.  USING EYE-TRACKING TO INVESTIGATE TOPICS IN L2 ACQUISITION AND L2 PROCESSING , 2013, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Context-dependent Semantic Processing in the Human Brain: Evidence from Idiom Comprehension , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[13]  Philip Durrant,et al.  Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming , 2010 .

[14]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[15]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results , 2003 .

[17]  Tatiana Nekrasova,et al.  English L1 and L2 Speakers' Knowledge of Lexical Bundles. , 2009 .

[18]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: the role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  G. Carrol,et al.  FOUND IN TRANSLATION , 2016, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[20]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[21]  Gabrielle Hogan-Brun,et al.  The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics , 2012 .

[22]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  The encyclopedia of applied linguistics , 2013 .

[23]  Ian Cunnings,et al.  An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers , 2012 .

[24]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[25]  Henrik Gyllstad.  Comparing L1 and L2 phraseological processing : free combinations, collocations and idioms , 2016 .

[26]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers , 2011 .

[27]  Brent Wolter,et al.  FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING , 2013, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[28]  N. Snider,et al.  More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases , 2010 .

[29]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  More than Words: The Effect of Multi-word Frequency and Constituency on Phonetic Duration , 2013, Language and speech.

[30]  R. Moon.  Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach , 1998 .

[31]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena , 2013 .

[32]  M. Hoey.  Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language , 2005 .

[33]  I.S.P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language , 2001 .

[34]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[35]  J. Charles Alderson,et al.  Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface between Learning and Assessment , 2005 .

[36]  John N. Williams,et al.  Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[37]  R. Bailey,et al.  The computer and literary studies , 1974 .

[38]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  EMPIRICAL STUDY Concurrent Statistical Learning of Adjacent and Nonadjacent Dependencies , 2016 .

[39]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis,et al.  Two-Track Mind: Formulaic and Novel Language Support a Dual-Process Model , 2012 .

[41]  A. Siyanova‐Chanturia,et al.  The idiom principle revisited , 2014 .

[42]  Henrik Gyllstad,et al.  Collocational Processing in Light of the Phraseological Continuum Model: Does Semantic Transparency Matter?. , 2016 .

[43]  J. Trim.  Applied Linguistics in Society. , 1988 .

[44]  Brent Wolter,et al.  Collocational Links in the L2 Mental Lexicon and the Influence of L1 Intralexical Knowledge , 2011 .

[45]  Anna Siyanova-Chanturia,et al.  Eye-tracking and ERPs in multi-word expression research: A state-of-the-art review of the method and findings , 2013 .

[46]  N. Ellis,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of languages , 1997 .

[47]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[49]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[50]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test , 2001 .

[51]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Ulrich Dirnagl,et al.  Found in translation: preclinical stroke research predicts human pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic outcomes. , 2014, Stroke.

[53]  J. Fox.  Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models , 2003 .

[54]  Rushen Shi,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to non-adjacent dependencies across phonological phrase boundaries. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  N. Schmitt,et al.  L2 Learner Production and Processing of Collocation: A Multi-study Perspective , 2008 .

[56]  C. Westbury,et al.  Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. , 2011 .

[57]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[58]  Mark Yates,et al.  The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading , 2008, Cognition.

[59]  Ute Römer,et al.  Exploring the lexis-grammar interface , 2009 .

[60]  Albert Costa,et al.  More than words: multiword frequency effects in non-native speakers , 2016 .

[61]  Gareth Carrol,et al.  Eye-tracking multi-word units: some methodological questions , 2015 .

[62]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.

[63]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[64]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (1): Lexical access , 2009 .

[65]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Oxford handbook of eye movements , 2011 .

[67]  Elke Peters,et al.  The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors , 2016 .

[68]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Why are idioms recognized fast? , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[69]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[70]  David D. Qian,et al.  Investigating the Relationship Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Academic Reading Performance: An Assessment Perspective , 2002 .

[71]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[72]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  Time and again: The changing effect of word and multiword frequency on phonetic duration for highly frequent sequences , 2014 .

[73]  Ji Hyon Kim,et al.  Frequency Effects in L2 Multiword Unit Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. , 2012 .