The role of commitment in software process improvement

Software process improvement (SPI) approaches have been designed to produce changes at many levels, i.e. in the strategies, culture and working practices, of software development. Studies have shown that nearly two thirds of all SPI efforts have failed or fallen short of expectations. It is often stated in SPI-related literature and practice that "commitment" to SPI plays an important part in determining whether an SPI endeavor ultimately becomes a success or a failure. However, it often remains unclear what this concept actually means and how it affects SPI. This thesis argues for a scientifically grounded concept of commitment and delivers a description and a definition of this concept in the context of software process improvement. The elaboration of the concept is based on a literature study, which makes the research done in behavioral psychology and organizational science applicable in the field of software process improvement. This thesis shows that current thinking relies on practical models of commitment, and the empirically validated analysis conducted within this study reveals a number of common misleading assumptions regarding the notion and development of commitment in SPI. On this basis, this thesis suggests that the commitment phenomenon is better explained through what can be called strategic, operational and personal commitment nets. This framework can be used for analyzing the unfolding and alteration of commitment towards a specific entity, in this case a software process improvement endeavor, through time and changing circumstances. The viability and usefulness of the commitment nets framework is demonstrated through an analysis of four SPI cases in two software organizations. As a result, it is shown that even though the objective features of SPI in terms of costs and benefits may be dominating in the project initiation phase, their role tends to lose strength later on due to an inability of the SPI effort to produce quick and meaningful results, even if these are explicitly sought for. This phenomenon gives rise to a need for enhancing the role of social and psychological drivers. If this is not achieved, SPI activities are likely to cease to exist. The empirical analysis demonstrates that the use of the commitment nets model enables a more precise analysis of the various aspects involved in the commitment phenomenon than what would have been possible with current commitment models. Commitment, as conceptualized and operationalized in this thesis, makes a significant contribution to the outcome of the SPI initiative. The empirical evidence shows that, eventually, even well-planned SPI initiatives may fail to reach the goals set for them due to changes in commitment nets.

[1]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Principles of Metrics Implementation , 2002 .

[2]  George Yamamura Process Improvement Satisfies Employees , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[3]  Paul Iles,et al.  Is continuance commitment beneficial to organizations? Commitment‐performance relationship: a new look , 2000 .

[4]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Trapped Administrator: Effects of Job Insecurity and Policy Resistance upon Commitment to a Course of Action. , 1979 .

[5]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept , 2001 .

[6]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. , 1994 .

[7]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Successful Diffusion of Innovations: Guidance for Software Development Organizations , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[9]  D. Randall Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited , 1987 .

[10]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[11]  Timo Jokela,et al.  Assessment of user-centred design processes as a basis for improvement action , 2001 .

[12]  R. Kanter COMMITMENT AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: A STUDY OF COMMITMENT MECHANISMS IN UTOPIAN COMMUNITIES * , 1968 .

[13]  Aviad Bar-Hayim,et al.  The dimensions of organizational commitment , 1992 .

[14]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Exploring the assumptions underlying information systems methodologies: Their impact on past, present and future ISM research , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Rick Hefner Lessons Learned with the Systems Security Engineering Capability Maturity Model , 1997, Proceedings of the (19th) International Conference on Software Engineering.

[16]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process , 1994 .

[17]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[18]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  Elements of Software Process Assessment & Improvement , 1999 .

[19]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL ESCALATION AND EXIT: LESSONS FROM THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT , 1993 .

[20]  O. Grusky,et al.  Career mobility and organizational commitment. , 1966 .

[21]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  Spice: The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination , 1997 .

[22]  Judith G. Brodman,et al.  Realities and Rewards of Software Process Improvement , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[23]  Brian P. Mathews,et al.  Employee commitment: academic vs practitioner perspectives , 2000 .

[24]  E Ruspini,et al.  Longitudinal Research and the Analysis of Social Change , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[26]  Thomas E. Becker Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[27]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Building organizational commitment: A multifirm study , 1990 .

[28]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  The Human Dimension of the Software Process , 1999, Software Process: Principles, Methodology, Technology.

[29]  D. Wilson,et al.  Views of software quality: a field report , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..

[30]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Atte Kinnula,et al.  Software process engineering systems: models and industry cases , 2001 .

[32]  Deependra Moitra,et al.  Managing change for software process improvement initiatives: a practical experience-based approach , 1998, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[33]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems , 1981 .

[34]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Runaway information systems projects and escalating commitment , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[35]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Exchange Theory Determinants of Affective and Continuance Commitment and Turnover , 1993 .

[36]  Ivan Aaen,et al.  The Correct Effort , 2002 .

[37]  Linley Hartmann,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A MULTI METHOD SCALE ANALYSIS AND TEST OF EFFECTS , 2000 .

[38]  Jon P. Howell,et al.  Does Cultural Socialization Predict Multiple Bases and Foci of Commitment? , 2000 .

[39]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[40]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Challenges to IS quality , 1999, Information and Software Technology.

[42]  Michael Diaz,et al.  How Software Process Improvement Helped Motorola , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[43]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of Commitment in Software Process Improvement , 2001, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Information technology and the institution of identity: Reflections since Understanding Computers and Cognition , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[45]  Mark Keil,et al.  Understanding runaway IT projects: preliminary results from a program of research based on escalation theory , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[46]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[47]  H. Klein,et al.  Two Investigations of the Relationships among Group Goals, Goal Commitment, Cohesion, and Performance , 1995 .

[48]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Responses to Failure: The Effects of Choice and Responsibility on Impression Management , 1982 .

[49]  Abraham Kaplan,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Sciences. San Francesco: Chandler , 1964 .

[50]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[51]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Effects of Continuance, Affective, and Moral Commitment on the Withdrawal Process: an Evaluation of Eight Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[52]  Richard T. Mowday,et al.  Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment , 1998 .

[53]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[54]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[55]  Claude Y. Laporte,et al.  Addressing the People Issues when Developing and Implementing Engineering Processes , 1999 .

[56]  Joseph A. Alutto,et al.  Personal and Role-Related Factors in the Development of Organizational Commitment. , 1972 .

[57]  Paula C. Morrow,et al.  The theory and measurement of work commitment , 1993 .

[58]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Information systems and strategic change: a critical review of business process re-engineering , 1999 .

[59]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[60]  William E. Hefley,et al.  People Capability Maturity Model. SM. , 1995 .

[61]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[62]  Patricia A. McQuaid,et al.  Entry strategies into the process improvement initiative , 1998 .

[63]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Sustaining Process Improvement and Innovation in the Information Services Function: Lessons Learned at the Bose Corporation , 1996, MIS Q..

[64]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1 , 1980 .

[65]  Huseyin Leblebici New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects , 1999 .

[66]  Bruce Buchanan BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: THE SOCIALIZATION OF MANAGERS IN WORK ORGANIZATIONS , 1974 .

[67]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Is management commitment a necessity after all in software process improvement? , 2000, Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference. EUROMICRO 2000. Informatics: Inventing the Future.

[68]  J. Searle,et al.  Expression and Meaning. , 1982 .

[69]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Understanding and Changing Software Organizations , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[70]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Rewards, investments, alternatives and organizational commitment: Empirical evidence and theoretical development , 1990 .

[71]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[72]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Software process improvement in very small enterprises: does it pay off? , 1998, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[73]  William A. Florac,et al.  Practical Software Measurement: Measuring for Process Management and Improvement, , 1997 .

[74]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Overcoming the problems in information systems development by building and sustaining commitment , 1995 .

[75]  Susan Rosenbaum,et al.  Schlumberger's Software Improvement Program , 1994, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[76]  Michael E. Brown Identification and Some Conditions of Organizational Involvement , 1969 .

[77]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Successful Software Process Improvement , 1997 .

[78]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  A discipline for software engineering , 2012, Series in software engineering.

[79]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[80]  J. Almaraz,et al.  Quality Management and the Process of Change , 1994 .

[81]  Norman E. Fenton,et al.  Implementing Effective Software Metrics Programs , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[82]  Egon Berghout,et al.  The Goal/Question/Metric method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development , 1999 .

[83]  Karen Beck,et al.  Development of Affective Organizational Commitment: A Cross-Sequential Examination of Change with Tenure , 2000 .

[84]  Micha Popper,et al.  The Value Content of Organizational Mission as a Factor in the Commitment of Members , 1989 .

[85]  H. Kelman PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[86]  Robert L. Glass The realities of software technology payoffs , 1999, CACM.

[87]  H. Russell Johnston,et al.  Developing Capabilities to Use Information Strategically , 1988, MIS Q..

[88]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .

[89]  D. F. Coleman,et al.  Another look at the locus of control–organizational commitment relationship: it depends on the form of commitment , 1999 .

[90]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Commitment development in software process improvement: critical misconceptions , 2001, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001.

[91]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[92]  W. R. King,et al.  Decision Processes for Developing Strategic Applications of Information Systems: A Contingency Approach* , 1992 .

[93]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. , 1995 .

[94]  Birgit Benkhoff Ignoring Commitment Is Costly: New Approaches Establish the Missing Link Between Commitment and Performance , 1997 .

[95]  J. O. Urmson,et al.  How to Do Things with Words@@@The William James Lectures , 1963 .

[96]  Sami Zahran Software process improvement - practical guidelines for business success , 1998 .

[97]  Jerry I. Porras,et al.  Common Behavior Changes in Successful Organization Development Efforts , 1986 .

[98]  Diane B. Walz,et al.  Investigating traits of top performing software developers , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[99]  M. E. Sheldon,et al.  Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization , 1971 .

[100]  Bob McFeeley,et al.  IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement. , 1996 .

[101]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Title of the article: Commitment to Software Process improvement – Development of Diagnostic Tool to Facilitate Improvement1 Authors: , 2019 .

[102]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[103]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[104]  I. Sommerville,et al.  The Role Of Information Systems Methodology In Software Engineering [Editorial] , 1998 .

[105]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[106]  M. J. Petry The Phenomenology of Spirit , 1978 .

[107]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Structured Approaches to Managing Change , 1999 .

[108]  Stig Bang,et al.  Accelerating CMM-based improvement programs: the accelerator model and method with experiences , 2001, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[109]  B. M. Staw The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[110]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  PROFES-A Product-driven Process Improvement Methodology , 1998 .

[111]  W. Andrew Taylor,et al.  Senior executives and ISO 9000 , 1995 .

[112]  Tore Dybå,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement , 2000, Empirical Software Engineering.

[113]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small software company , 2001, ECIS.

[114]  J. Katz,et al.  The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First , 1998 .

[115]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[116]  Bill Trahant,et al.  Creating a change reaction: How understanding organizational dynamics can ease reengineering , 1996 .

[117]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[118]  Birgit Benkhoff,et al.  Ignoring Commitment Is Costly: New Approaches Establish the Missing Link Between Commitment and Performance , 1997 .

[119]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[120]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[121]  Veikko Seppänen,et al.  Competence change in contract R&D : analysis of project nets , 2000 .

[122]  J. Hage,et al.  Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. , 1982 .

[123]  John Major,et al.  Meeting the Software Challenge: Strategy for Competitive Success , 1998 .

[124]  Pouya Pourkomeylian Analyzing an SPI Project with the Map Framework , 2001, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[125]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[126]  Veikko Seppänen,et al.  Contexts of KM Based SPI: The Case of Software Design Experience Reuse , 2001, PROFES.

[127]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[128]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  New Directions in Organizational Behavior , 1976 .

[129]  Brown,et al.  Organizational Commitment: Clarifying the Concept and Simplifying the Existing Construct Typology , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[130]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  Software process evolution at the SEL , 1994, IEEE Software.

[131]  Danny Miller,et al.  The people make the process: commitment to employees, decision making, and performance , 2001 .

[132]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[133]  Lasse Harjumaa,et al.  A tailored capability model for inspection process improvement , 2001, Proceedings Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software.

[134]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Lessons Learned in a National SPI Effort , 1998 .

[135]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Diffusion theory and practice: Disseminating quality management and software process improvement innovations , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[136]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[137]  Timo Jokela,et al.  Development of Management Commitment to Software Process Improvement , 2000 .

[138]  John M. Stevens,et al.  The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First, Jeffrey Pfeffer, 1998. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. 345 pp. $24.95. , 2001 .

[139]  Walter R. Nord,et al.  The individual in organizational studies: The great disappearing act? , 1996 .

[140]  Pertti Järvinen,et al.  Research Questions Guiding Selection of an Appropriate Research Method , 2000, ECIS.

[141]  Carlo Ghezzi,et al.  Software processes: a retrospective and a path to the future , 1998, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[142]  D. Conner,et al.  Building commitment to organizational change. , 1982 .

[143]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[144]  R. Scholl,et al.  Differentiating Organizational Commitment From Expectancy as a Motivating Force , 1981 .

[145]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[146]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment , 1989 .

[147]  J. Mackie,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .

[148]  C. Kiesler The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[149]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation , 1981 .

[150]  P. Morrow Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment , 1983 .

[151]  D. Holdcroft Expression and Meaning. , 1982 .

[152]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Critical Examination of the Internalization, Identification, and Compliance Commitment Measures , 1994 .

[153]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[154]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Case study principles for different types of cases , 1997 .

[155]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[156]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000, MIS Q..

[157]  Atte Kinnula,et al.  Software process engineering in a multi-site environment:an architectural design of a software process engineering system , 1999 .

[158]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[159]  Ivan Rozman,et al.  Managing the complexity of SPI in small companies , 2000 .

[160]  E. Lawler Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory , 1992 .

[161]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  A Conceptual MAP of Software Process Improvement , 2001, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[162]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[163]  Ilene Burnstein,et al.  A Testing Maturity Model for Software Test Process Assessment and Improvement , 1999 .

[164]  Richard Messnarz,et al.  Better Software Practice for Business Benefit: Principles and Experiences , 1999 .

[165]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  The rise and fall of Organizational Commitment , 1998 .

[166]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Determinants of success in software measurement programs: initial results , 1999, Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403).

[167]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  Success or Failure ? Modeling the Likelihood of Software Process Improvement , 1998 .

[168]  David Marca,et al.  Process improvement that lasts: an integrated training and consulting method , 1993, CACM.

[169]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[170]  P. Oquist,et al.  The Epistemology of Action Research , 1978 .

[171]  Werner Mellis,et al.  Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement , 1998 .

[172]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Managerial Overcommitment in Corporate Acquisition Processes , 1994 .

[173]  Francis Y. Lau,et al.  Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[174]  Søren Kierkegaard,et al.  Fear and Trembling , 1843 .

[175]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Conceptual simplicity meets organizational complexity: case study of a corporate metrics program , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[176]  Y. Wiener,et al.  Commitment: A behavioral approach to job involvement☆ , 1977 .

[177]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[178]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Commitment Nets in Software Process Improvement , 2002, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[179]  H. Becker Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[180]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[181]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[182]  Alan L. Weimer,et al.  Recipe for a Successful System: Human Elements in System Development , 1999 .

[183]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[184]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[185]  R. Hackett,et al.  Further assessments of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. , 1994 .

[186]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[187]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Improving Software Organizations: From Principles to Practice , 2001 .

[188]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[189]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Introduction to the Team Software Process , 1999 .

[190]  Y. Wiener Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View , 1982 .

[191]  KeilMark,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998 .

[192]  Alana Northrop,et al.  Public Administration , 1968, The Journal of Politics.

[193]  Gareth R. Jones Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers' Adjustments to Organizations , 1986 .

[194]  Joseph Moses Juran Juran on planning for quality , 1988 .

[195]  Allan Baktoft Jakobsen Bottom-up Process Improvement Tricks , 1998, IEEE Softw..

[196]  Mark Durkin,et al.  The effects of organisational change on employee psychological attachment An exploratory study , 2000 .

[197]  Deependra Moitra,et al.  Managing change for software process improvement initiatives: a practical experience‐based approach , 1998 .

[198]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[199]  Fred Kofman,et al.  Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations , 1993 .