A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. Methods: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. Results: The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.

[1]  H. Hartung,et al.  Interleukin-6 Receptor Blockade in Treatment-Refractory MOG-IgG–Associated Disease and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders , 2021, Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[2]  F. Shi,et al.  Early Initiation of Tocilizumab Treatment Against Moderate-to-Severe Myelitis in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[3]  D. Biotti,et al.  Off-label use of tocilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MOG-antibody-associated diseases: A case-series. , 2020, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[4]  K. Fujihara,et al.  Interleukin-6 in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder pathophysiology , 2020, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[5]  Xinghu Zhang,et al.  Effect of NMO-IgG on the interleukin-6 cascade in astrocytes via activation of the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. , 2020, Life sciences.

[6]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Safety and efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine in highly relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (TANGO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial , 2020, The Lancet Neurology.

[7]  H. Kim,et al.  Beneficial effects of intravenous immunoglobulin as an add-on therapy to azathioprine for NMO-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. , 2020, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[8]  T. Misu,et al.  Safety and efficacy of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (RIN-1 study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2020, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  S. Vukusic,et al.  Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of first-line therapies in NMOSD , 2020, Neurology.

[10]  I. Kister,et al.  Effectiveness of subcutaneous tocilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[11]  Jacqueline Palace,et al.  Trial of Satralizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Z. Shi,et al.  Effects of immunotherapies and prognostic predictors in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a prospective cohort study , 2019, Journal of Neurology.

[13]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[14]  B. Weinshenker,et al.  Long-term outcome and prognosis in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from Serbia. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[15]  Jacqueline Palace,et al.  Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Kermode,et al.  Clinical course, treatment responses and outcomes in Chinese paediatric neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[17]  Y. Long,et al.  Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil for Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Study in South China , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[18]  Chun-juan Wang,et al.  Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and lower dosages of rituximab among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder , 2018, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[19]  V. Shaygannejad,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial , 2017, Journal of Neurology.

[20]  Bingxing Shi,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressive therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during pregnancy , 2017, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[21]  P. Bai,et al.  Effectiveness of low dose of rituximab compared with azathioprine in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica: an over 2-year follow-up study , 2017, Acta Neurologica Belgica.

[22]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as treatments for neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder , 2017, European journal of neurology.

[23]  H. Ren,et al.  Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A prospective cohort study , 2016, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[24]  R. Marignier,et al.  Prediction of disease severity in neuromyelitis optica by the levels of interleukin (IL)‐6 produced during remission phase , 2016, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[25]  H. Hartung,et al.  Long-term Therapy With Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade in Highly Active Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[26]  A. Kermode,et al.  Azathioprine plus corticosteroid treatment in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[27]  Anca Moţăţăianu,et al.  Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis in neuromyelitis optica: a prospective study of 13 Caucasian patients and literature review , 2015, Acta Neurologica Belgica.

[28]  S. Galetta,et al.  Analysis of the treatment of neuromyelitis optica , 2015, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[29]  M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Treatment of neuromyelitis optica: state-of-the-art and emerging therapies , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[30]  S. Kusunoki,et al.  Efficacy of the anti–IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab in neuromyelitis optica , 2014, Neurology.

[31]  J. Palace,et al.  Long-term efficacy, tolerability and retention rate of azathioprine in 103 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients: a multicentre retrospective observational study from the UK , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[32]  Jacqueline A Palace,et al.  Comparison of relapse and treatment failure rates among patients with neuromyelitis optica: multicenter study of treatment efficacy. , 2014, JAMA neurology.

[33]  R. Gold,et al.  Interleukin 6 receptor blockade in patients with neuromyelitis optica nonresponsive to anti-CD20 therapy. , 2013, JAMA neurology.

[34]  B. Weinshenker,et al.  Azathioprine: Tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica , 2011, Neurology.

[35]  D. Bichuetti,et al.  Neuromyelitis optica treatment: analysis of 36 patients. , 2010, Archives of neurology.

[36]  M. Mori,et al.  Cytokine and chemokine profiles in neuromyelitis optica: significance of interleukin-6 , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[37]  M. Mutlu,et al.  Enhanced IL-6 Production in Aquaporin-4 Antibody Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Patients , 2010, The International journal of neuroscience.

[38]  S. Sahasranaman,et al.  Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of thiopurines , 2008, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[39]  B. Weinshenker,et al.  The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[40]  I. Hozo,et al.  Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[41]  Ichiro Nakashima,et al.  A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis , 2004, The Lancet.

[42]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.