Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Experiments were conducted with a single, bilateral cochlear implant user to examine interaural level and time-delay cues that putatively underlie the design and efficacy of bilateral implant systems. The subject's two implants were of different types but custom equipment allowed presentation of controlled bilateral stimuli, particularly those with specified interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) cues. A lateralization task was used to measure the effect of these cues on the perceived location of the sensations elicited. For trains of fixed-amplitude, biphasic current pulses at 100 pps, the subject demonstrated sensitivity to an ITD of 300 micros, providing evidence of access to binaural information. The choice of bilateral electrode pair greatly influenced ITD sensitivity, suggesting that electrode pairings are likely to be an important consideration in the effort to provide binaural advantages. The selection of bilateral electrode pairs showing sensitivity to ITD was partially aided by comparisons of the pitch elicited by individual electrodes in each ear (when stimulated alone with fixed-amplitude current pulses at 813 pps): specifically, interaural electrodes with similar pitches were more likely (but not certain) to show ITD sensitivity. Significant changes in lateral position occurred with specific electrode pairs. With five bilateral electrode pairs of 14 tested, ITDs of 300 and 600 micros moved an auditory image significantly from right to left. With these same pairs, ILD changes of approximately 11% of the dynamic range (in microApp) moved an auditory image from the far left to the far right-significantly farther than the nine pairs not showing significant ITD sensitivity. However, even these nine pairs did show response changes as a function of the interaural (or confounding monaural) level cue. Overall, insofar as the access to bilateral cues demonstrated herein generalizes to other subjects, it provides hope that the normal binaural advantages for speech recognition and sound localization can be made available to bilateral implant users.

[1]  Charles L. Wood,et al.  Detecting a Signal in Noise , 1958 .

[2]  Lloyd A. Jeffress Medial Geniculate Body—A Disavowal , 1958 .

[3]  D T Lawson,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[4]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[5]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Auditory Prostheses Research with Multiple Channel Intracochlear Stimulation in Man , 1978, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  B. McA. Sayers,et al.  Acoustic‐Image Lateralization Judgments with Binaural Transients , 1964 .

[7]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[8]  M. Pelizzone,et al.  Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  D K Eddington,et al.  Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers. , 1978, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[11]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single Auditory Units in the Superior Olivary Complex: II: Locations of Unit Categories and Tonotopic Organization , 1972 .

[12]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. I. General strategy and preliminary results on interaural discrimination. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. Wang,et al.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[15]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise , 1999 .

[16]  P. Rao Statistical Research Methods in the Life Sciences , 1997 .

[17]  G. Henning Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Binaural Cochlear Implants Placed during the Same Operation , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[20]  D. Grantham Chapter 9 – Spatial Hearing and Related Phenomena , 1995 .

[21]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Three-Month Results with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[22]  G M Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Elaine Saunders,et al.  Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array , 2001, Hearing Research.

[24]  H S Colburn,et al.  Lateral position and interaural discrimination. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex , 1972 .

[26]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[27]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Richard Van Hoesel,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User , 2002, Ear and hearing.