Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) in the Semantic Web: a multi-dimensional review

Since the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) specification and its SKOS eXtension for Labels (SKOS-XL) became formal W3C recommendations in 2009, a significant number of conventional Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) (including thesauri, classification schemes, name authorities, and lists of codes and terms, produced before the arrival of the ontology-wave) have made their journeys to join the Semantic Web mainstream. This paper uses “LOD KOS” as an umbrella term to refer to all of the value vocabularies and lightweight ontologies within the Semantic Web framework. The paper provides an overview of what the LOD KOS movement has brought to various communities and users. These are not limited to the colonies of the value vocabulary constructors and providers, nor the catalogers and indexers who have a long history of applying the vocabularies to their products. The LOD dataset producers and LOD service providers, the information architects and interface designers, and researchers in sciences and humanities, are also direct beneficiaries of LOD KOS. The paper examines a set of the collected cases (experimental or in real applications) and aims to find the usages of LOD KOS in order to share the practices and ideas among communities and users. Through the viewpoints of a number of different user groups, the functions of LOD KOS are examined from multiple dimensions. This paper focuses on the LOD dataset producers, vocabulary producers, and researchers (as end-users of KOS).

[1]  Douglas Tudhope,et al.  Improving interoperability using vocabulary linked data , 2015, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[2]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  Persona Conception and Gestation , 2010 .

[3]  Maria Cristina Pattuelli,et al.  Personal name vocabularies as linked open data: A case study of jazz artist names , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Osma Suominen,et al.  The Global Agricultural Concept Scheme and Agrisemantics , 2017, Dublin Core Conference.

[5]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies , 2013 .

[6]  Osma Suominen,et al.  GACS Core: Creation of a Global Agricultural Concept Scheme , 2016, MTSR.

[7]  M. Cristina Pattuelli,et al.  Ontology Building for Linked Open Data: A Pragmatic Perspective , 2015 .

[8]  Frode Guribye,et al.  LOGGING AND VISUALIZING AFFECTIVE INTERACTION FOR MENTAL HEALTH THERAPY , 2015 .

[9]  Antoine Isaac,et al.  Library Linked Data Incubator Group: Datasets, Value Vocabularies, and Metadata Element Sets. , 2011 .

[10]  Christopher Menzel,et al.  Reference Ontologies - Application Ontologies: Either/Or or Both/And? , 2003, KI Workshop on Reference Ontologies and Application Ontologies.

[11]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  A Pointless Theory of Space Based on Strong Connection and Congruence , 1996, KR.

[12]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Recent applications of Knowledge Organization Systems: introduction to a special issue , 2015, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[13]  Philipp Mayr,et al.  Interlinking Large-scale Library Data with Authority Records , 2017, Front. Digit. Humanit..

[14]  Claire Sibille-de Grimoüard,et al.  The Thesaurus for French Local Archives and the Semantic Web , 2014 .

[15]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference , 2009 .

[16]  Erik Stubkjær,et al.  A SKOS vocabulary for Linked Land Administration: Cadastre and Land Administration Thesaurus , 2015 .

[17]  Douglas Tudhope,et al.  New Applications of Knowledge Organization Systems: introduction to a special issue , 2006 .

[18]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  Title : Biological Names and Taxonomies on the Semantic Web-Managing the Change in Scientific Conception Year : 2011 Version : Post print , 2018 .

[19]  Philipp Mayr,et al.  TheSoz: A SKOS representation of the thesaurus for the social sciences , 2012, Semantic Web.

[20]  Kristi Wiley,et al.  Review of "The user experience team of one: A research and design survival guide by L. Buley" Rosenfeld Media 2013 978-1-933820-18-7. , 2015, CDQR.

[21]  Organización Internacional de Normalización ISO 25964-1 : Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval , 2011 .

[22]  Isabelle Mougenot,et al.  Towards a thesaurus of plant characteristics: an ecological contribution , 2017 .