Preliminary steps toward a general theory of internet-based collective-action in digital information commons: Findings from a study of open source software projects

This paper presents some of the findings from a 5-year empirical study of FOSS (free/libre and open source software) commons, completed in 2011.  FOSS projects are Internet-based common property regimes where the project source code is developed over the Internet. The resulting software is generally distributed with a license that provides users with the freedoms to access, use, read, modify and redistribute the software. In this study we used three different and very large datasets (approximately 107,000; 174,000 and 1400 cases respectively) with information on FOSS projects residing in Sourceforge.net, one of the largest, if not the largest, FOSS repository in the world. We employ various quantitative methods to uncover factors that lead some FOSS projects to ongoing collaborative success, while others become abandoned. After presenting some of our study’s results, we articulate the collaborative “story” of FOSS that emerged. We close the paper by discussing some key findings that can contribute to a general theory of Internet-based collective-action and FOSS-like forms of digital online commons.

[1]  Karl Fogel,et al.  Producing open source software - how to run a successful free software project , 2005 .

[2]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis of Open Source Research , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[4]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[5]  Karim R. huff,et al.  The Open Source Paradigm Shift , 2007 .

[6]  Luis Rodero-Merino,et al.  Studying the evolution of libre software projects using publicly available data , 2012 .

[7]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[8]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  The Economic Motivation of Open Source Software: Stakeholder Perspectives , 2007, Computer.

[9]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  Paul A. David,et al.  Community-Based Production of Open Source Software: What Do We Know about the Developers Who Participate? , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[11]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons , 2007 .

[12]  Jutta Haider,et al.  Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice , 2008, J. Documentation.

[13]  E. Ostrom,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons : a chapter from Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: from Theory to Practice. , 2005 .

[14]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  FLOSSmole: A Collaborative Repository for FLOSS Research Data and Analyses , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Web Eng..

[15]  David Bollier,et al.  Book Review: Viral Spiral: How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic of Their Own , 2009 .

[16]  Joel West,et al.  Contrasting Community Building in Sponsored and Community Founded Open Source Projects , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Free / Libre Open Source Software : What We Know and What We Do Not Know , 2022 .

[18]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[19]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[20]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[21]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[22]  George N. Dafermos,et al.  Management and Virtual Decentralised Networks: The Linux Project , 2001, First Monday.

[23]  William Tibben,et al.  Internet success: a study of open-source software commons , 2013 .

[24]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[25]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[26]  Charles M. Schweik,et al.  An Institutional Analysis Approach to Studying Libre Software “Commons”. , 2005 .

[27]  Dawid Weiss,et al.  Measuring success of open source projects using web search engines , 2005 .

[28]  R. English,et al.  Identifying Success and Tragedy of FLOSS Commons: A Preliminary Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects , 2007, First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS'07: ICSE Workshops 2007).

[29]  Samir Chopra Open Source: Technology and Policy , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[31]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Reclassifying Success and Tragedy in FLOSS Projects , 2010, OSS.

[32]  Andrés Guadamuz González,et al.  Information Feudalism: Who owns the Knowledge Economy? , 2004, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..