BACKGROUND
Both maternal mortality rate and severe maternal morbidity rate have risen significantly in the United Sates. Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention introduced International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, criteria for defining severe maternal morbidity with the use of administrative data sources; however, those criteria have not been validated with the use of chart reviews.
OBJECTIVE
The primary aim of the current study was to validate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, criteria for the identification of severe maternal morbidity. This analysis initially required the development of a reproducible set of clinical conditions that were judged to be consistent with severe maternal morbidity to be used as the clinical gold standard for validation. Alternative criteria for severe maternal morbidity were also examined.
STUDY DESIGN
The 67,468 deliveries that occurred during a 12-month period from 16 participating California hospitals were screened initially for severe maternal morbidity with the presence of any of 4 criteria: (1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, diagnosis and procedure codes; (2) prolonged postpartum length of stay (>3 standard deviations beyond the mean length of stay for the California population); (3) any maternal intensive care unit admissions (with the use of hospital billing sources); and (4) the administration of any blood product (with the use of transfusion service data). Complete medical records for all screen-positive cases were examined to determine whether they satisfied the criteria for the clinical gold standard (determined by 4 rounds of a modified Delphi technique). Descriptive and statistical analyses that included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and C-statistic were performed.
RESULTS
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, criteria had a reasonably high sensitivity of 0.77 and a positive predictive value of 0.44 with a C-statistic of 0.87. The most important source of false-positive cases were mothers whose only criterion was 1-2 units of blood products. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, criteria screen rate ranged from 0.51-2.45% among hospitals. True positive severe maternal morbidity ranged from 0.05-1.13%. When hospitals were grouped by their neonatal intensive care unit level of care, severe maternal morbidity rates were statistically lower at facilities with lower level neonatal intensive care units (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, criteria can serve as a reasonable administrative metric for measuring severe maternal morbidity at population levels. Caution should be used with the use of these criteria for individual hospitals, because case-mix effects appear to be strong.
[1]
S. Kilpatrick,et al.
Defining a conceptual framework for near-miss maternal morbidity.
,
2002,
Journal of the American Medical Women's Association.
[2]
Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.
The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus
,
2007
.
[3]
W. Callaghan,et al.
Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Delivery and Postpartum Hospitalizations in the United States
,
2012,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[4]
Samuel DiGangi,et al.
Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, Parallel analysis, and TETRAD
,
2007
.
[5]
C. Berg,et al.
Standardized Severe Maternal Morbidity Review: Rationale and Process
,
2014,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[6]
C. Berg,et al.
Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005
,
2010,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[7]
W. Callaghan,et al.
Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: it is time to start.
,
2014,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[8]
C. Berg,et al.
Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991-2003.
,
2008,
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[9]
W. Grobman,et al.
Validation of a Scoring System to Identify Women with Near-Miss Maternal Morbidity
,
2008,
American Journal of Perinatology.
[10]
C. Berg,et al.
Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2006–2010
,
2015,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[11]
Samuel F Posner,et al.
Severe Obstetric Morbidity in the United States: 1998–2005
,
2009,
Obstetrics and gynecology.
[12]
S. Kilpatrick,et al.
A scoring system identified near-miss maternal morbidity during pregnancy.
,
2004,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.