Research and Teaching: A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes.

Vol. 44, No. 6, 2015 We developed a classroom observation protocol for quantitatively measuring student engagement in large university classes. The Behavioral Engagement Related to Instruction (BERI) protocol can be used to provide timely feedback to instructors as to how they can improve student engagement in their classrooms. We tested BERI on seven courses with different instructors and pedagogy. BERI achieved excellent interrater agreement (>95%) with a one-hour training session with new observers. It also showed consistent patterns of variation in engagement with instructor actions and classroom activity. Most notably, it showed that there was substantially higher engagement among the same group of students when interactive teaching methods were used compared with more traditional didactic methods. The same general variations in student engagement with instructional methods were present in all parts of the room and for different instructors. A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes

[1]  George D. Kuh.  The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations , 2009 .

[2]  Monica F. Cox,et al.  Developing an Observation System to Capture Instructional Differences in Engineering Classrooms , 2003 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. , 1984 .

[4]  Sergio Román,et al.  University students' academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Elaine Chapman,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates , 2003 .

[6]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[7]  Kimberly J O'Malley,et al.  Validation Of An Observation Instrument For Measuring Student Engagement In Health Professions Settings , 2003, Evaluation & the health professions.

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[9]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  J. Connell,et al.  The validity of students' self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. , 1992 .

[11]  John H. Hoag,et al.  Seating Location in Large Lectures: Are Seating Preferences or Location Related to Course Performance? , 2004 .

[12]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  H. Waxman,et al.  Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms: The Uses of the Classroom Observation Schedule to Improve Classroom Instruction , 2004 .

[14]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Students pay attention! , 2009 .