Impacts of polymer/surfactant interactions on spray drift

Polymers and surfactants are commonly used as adjuvants in agrochemical spray solutions. In this study, we probe the effects of changes in steady state polymer chain conformation (as a result of surfactant addition) on the physical properties of dilute polymer solutions and the resulting spray performance when such solutions are processed through a commercial spray nozzle. To create a panel of model adjuvant formulations for spraying, we added either an associative (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) or non-associative (Tween20 (polysorbate20)) surfactant, over a range of concentrations, to a base dilute Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) solution. The addition of the associative SDS to the PEO solution decreased the dynamic surface tension, slightly increased the zero shear viscosity and substantially increased the extensional properties of the solutions, with a strong dependency on SDS concentration. Under the high deformation processes experienced in a spray nozzle, the addition of SDS shifted the droplet size distribution to larger droplet sizes, and substantially reduced the spray drift. No such changes were seen for the non-associative PEO/Tween20 system. The changes in the dynamics of extension of the PEO chains induced through the association of a surfactant were found to be the dominant effector dictating spray performance.

[1]  L. Walker,et al.  Surface tension driven jet break up of strain-hardening polymer solutions , 2001 .

[2]  J. Combellack,et al.  A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants , 1996 .

[3]  K. Yasuda,et al.  Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of linear and star branched polystyrenes , 1981 .

[4]  M. J. Rosen,et al.  Dynamic surface tension of aqueous surfactant solutions: I. Basic paremeters , 1988 .

[5]  C. Tuck,et al.  How surface tension of surfactant solutions influences the characteristics of sprays produced by hydraulic nozzles used for pesticide application , 2001 .

[6]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Gareth H. McKinley,et al.  Elasto-capillary thinning and breakup of model elastic liquids , 2001 .

[8]  N. Dombrowski,et al.  A photographic investigation into the disintegration of liquid sheets , 1954, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  MEASUREMENT OF EXTENSIONAL VISCOSITY OF POLYMER SOLUTIONS AND ITS EFFECTS ON ATOMIZATION FROM A SPRAY NOZZLE , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel R. Lester,et al.  Drop formation dynamics of constant low-viscosity, elastic fluids , 2002 .

[11]  R. Bird,et al.  On coil–stretch transitions in dilute polymer solutions , 1989 .

[12]  Peter Hobson,et al.  Spray Drift from Hydraulic Spray Nozzles: the Use of a Computer Simulation Model to Examine Factors Influencing Drift , 1993 .

[13]  W. E. Bagley,et al.  Adjuvant effects on spray characteristics and drift potential , 2001 .

[14]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  The role of dynamic surface tension and elasticity on the dynamics of drop impact , 2001 .

[15]  B. Cabane,et al.  Organization of surfactant micelles adsorbed on a polymer molecule in water : a neutron scattering study , 1982 .

[16]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  A System to Evaluate Shear Effects on Spray Drift Retardant Performance , 1996 .

[17]  P. Spanoghe,et al.  Influence of agricultural adjuvants on droplet spectra. , 2007, Pest management science.

[18]  David R Johnson,et al.  Development of the Spray Drift Task force database for aerial applications , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[19]  D. Stock,et al.  Physicochemical Properties of Adjuvants: Values and Applications1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[20]  E. Goddard Polymer—surfactant interaction Part I. uncharged water-soluble polymers and charged surfactants , 1986 .

[21]  Jim Hanan,et al.  A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles , 2013 .

[22]  S. Wilson,et al.  CONTROLLING DROPLET-SIZE DISTRIBUTION USING OIL EMULSIONS IN AGRICULTURAL SPRAYS , 2010 .

[23]  E. Hilz,et al.  Spray drift review: The extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift reduction , 2013 .

[24]  FLUID VELOCITY AND SHEAR IN ELLIPTIC-ORIFICE SPRAY NOZZLES , 1995 .

[25]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  Capillary Break-up Rheometry of Low-Viscosity Elastic Fluids , 2005 .

[26]  J. Rothstein,et al.  The effect of step-stretch parameters on capillary breakup extensional rheology (CaBER) measurements , 2009 .

[27]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  Drop formation and breakup of low viscosity elastic fluids: Effects of molecular weight and concentration , 2006 .

[28]  J. Rothstein,et al.  The Effect of Step‐Stretch Parameters on Capillary Breakup Extensional Rheology (CaBER) Measurements , 2008 .

[29]  D. Blankschtein,et al.  Complexation of nonionic polymers and surfactants in dilute aqueous solutions , 1994 .

[30]  N. Chigier,et al.  Air-blast atomization of non-Newtonian liquids , 1995 .

[31]  L. F. Bouse,et al.  EFFECT OF SPRAY MIXTURE ON DROPLET SIZE , 1990 .

[32]  Justin J. Cooper-White,et al.  The effects of chain conformation in the microfluidic entry flow of polymer–surfactant systems , 2009 .