The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship

Since its conception in 1999, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has become a leading template for voluntary sustainability reporting by companies. Emerging on the crest of the debate about corporate social responsibility, appropriate roles for business, government, and civil society in the sustainability transition, and private forms of global governance, it is also a descendant of 1970s social movements. Drawing on extensive empirical data collected through interviews and documentary analysis in four countries, the institutional entrepreneurship framework is used to analyse three types of tactics deployed by GRI champions: discursive, material and charismatic. Central to GRI entrepreneurs' success was maintaining balance between the individual and collective interests of their diverse constituencies, between inclusiveness and efficient pursuit of technical objectives, and between building a new institution and not challenging existing institutions and power relations. This strategy, though perhaps appropriate under the circumstances, left a legacy of unresolved tensions. How these are resolved will determine GRI's future shape and function.

[1]  J. Cannon Environmental steel; pollution in the iron and steel industry , 1974 .

[2]  G. Kerlin,et al.  Cracking down : oil refining and pollution control , 1975 .

[3]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[4]  R. Collins,et al.  Weberian Sociological Theory , 1986 .

[5]  R. Collins Weberian sociological theory: Frontmatter , 1986 .

[6]  C. Ziegler Environmental Policy in the USSR , 1987 .

[7]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[8]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[9]  M. Finger,et al.  The Earth Brokers: Power, Politics and World Development. , 1994 .

[10]  J. Elkington Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[11]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Evaluating Public Policy , 1995 .

[12]  Michael E. Kraft,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY IN THE 1990S , 1996 .

[13]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[14]  John Grin,et al.  Technology Assessment as Learning , 1996 .

[15]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory , 1996 .

[16]  J. H. Taylor,et al.  Loosing the Bonds: The United States and South Africa in the Apartheid Years , 1997 .

[17]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[18]  Kelley Lee,et al.  "Privatisation" in the United Nations system: Patterns of influence in three intergovernmental organisations , 1997 .

[19]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[20]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[21]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[22]  Richard N. L. Andrews,et al.  Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy, Second Edition , 1999 .

[23]  Allen L. White Sustainability and the Accountable Corporation , 1999 .

[24]  P. Sabatier Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[25]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[26]  F. Deng,et al.  CRITICAL CHOICES The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance , 2000 .

[27]  Simon Zadek,et al.  The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .

[28]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIPS IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY , 2001 .

[29]  Neil Fligstein The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies , 2001 .

[30]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy , 2001 .

[31]  M. Ottaway Corporatism Goes Global: International Organizations, Nongovernmental Organization Networks, and Transnational Business , 2001 .

[32]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and the Theory of Fields* , 2001 .

[33]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[34]  M. Graham,et al.  Democracy by Disclosure: The Rise of Technopopulism , 2002 .

[35]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[36]  P. Utting REGULATING BUSINESS VIA MULTISTAKEHOLDER INITIATIVES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT , 2002 .

[37]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[38]  William Crampton,et al.  LEGITIMACY AND THE INTERNET: AN EXAMINATION OF CORPORATE WEB PAGE ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES , 2003 .

[39]  W. Laufer Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing , 2003 .

[40]  S. Waddock Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real , 2004 .

[41]  Kelly Freeman,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Sustainability Reporting : An Alternative Methodological Approach , 2004 .

[42]  Anne-Marie Slaughter,et al.  A New World Order , 2004 .

[43]  T. Lawrence,et al.  From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-Cultural Discourse and Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Institutional Fields , 2004 .

[44]  Ans Kolk,et al.  A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance , 2004 .

[45]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .

[46]  Jeffrey A. Hollender,et al.  What Matters Most: How a Small Group of Pioneers Is Teaching Social Responsibility to Big Business, and Why Big Business Is Listening , 2004 .

[47]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse and Institutions , 2004 .

[48]  A. Midttun Realigning business, government and civil society , 2005 .

[49]  A. Crane,et al.  Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization , 2005 .

[50]  D. Owen,et al.  Assurance Statement Practice in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Evaluation , 2005 .

[51]  P. Pattberg The institutionalization of private governance: How business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules , 2005 .

[52]  Dara O'Rourke,et al.  Market Movements: Nongovernmental Organization Strategies to Influence Global Production and Consumption , 2005 .

[53]  A. Kolk Environmental Reporting by Multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or Divergence , 2005 .

[54]  A. Kolk More than words? : an analysis of sustainability reports , 2005 .

[55]  T. Guay,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and Ngo Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective , 2006 .

[56]  Daniel J. Fiorino The New Environmental Regulation , 2006 .

[57]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Emergence of New Global Institutions: A Discursive Perspective , 2006 .

[58]  Nicholas Dew Institutional Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[59]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[60]  David L. Levy,et al.  The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields , 2007 .

[61]  F. Biermann Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research , 2007 .

[62]  Klaus Dingwerth,et al.  The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy , 2007 .

[63]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[64]  David L. Levy,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Theories of Global Governance , 2008 .

[65]  S. Waddock Building the Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[66]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Sustainability, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Exploring Multinationals' Reporting Practices , 2008 .

[67]  Nick Anstead,et al.  Tools of government in the digital age , 2009 .

[68]  David L. Levy,et al.  Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting , 2009 .