Combating Fossilization through Feedback: Does it Work?

This pseudo-longitudinal study adopted typical-error and corrective feedback approaches to investigating interlanguage fossilization. The errors in the argumentative essays of 76 Iranian EFL learners within and across three proficiency levels were identified and classified using the model proposed by Gass and Selinker (1994). The learners were first provided with implicit and then explicit feedback to see if the two feedback types would improve written production, and if there were errors that persisted. The results indicated that word choice, plural, word form and article “the” were the most frequent types of errors, with word choice topping the list. The results also showed that, although providing learners with feedback could lead to a reduction in errors, explicit feedback was a more effective strategy. However, the t-test results demonstrated that the short-term impact of feedback could not be sustained over time, a finding congruent with those of Truscott (2007) who questioned the efficacy of error correction. Moreover, the findings revealed that the error categories of pronoun, word order, passive and

[1]  D. Ferris SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLA , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Michael H. Long Stabilization and Fossilization in Interlanguage Development , 2008 .

[3]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[4]  Donna Lardiere Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state , 1998 .

[5]  Nazlia Omar,et al.  Developing an error analysis marking tool for ESL learners , 2007 .

[6]  Rule difficulty and the usefulness of instruction , 2008 .

[7]  Edith Schouten Crosslinguistic Influence and the Expression of Hypothetical Meaning , 1996 .

[8]  M. Martin Advanced Vocabulary Teaching: The Problem of Synonyms* , 1984 .

[9]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[10]  Jessie Carduner Teaching proofreading skills as a means of reducing composition errors , 2007 .

[11]  Terence Odlin,et al.  Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition , 2006 .

[12]  John Truscott,et al.  The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately , 2007 .

[13]  Lydia White,et al.  Island Effects in Second Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[14]  周彬彬,et al.  Interlanguage : forty years later , 2014 .

[15]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  Maturation and the Issue of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[16]  D. Ferris THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[17]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. , 2010 .

[18]  Christine Goring. Kepner An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[19]  Jean Chandler,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING , 2003 .

[20]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[21]  David Birdsong,et al.  Second Language Acquisition and Ultimate Attainment , 2008 .

[22]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[23]  D. Ferris The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .

[24]  B. Vanpatten,et al.  Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research , 1998 .

[25]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages , 1984 .

[26]  Azizollah Dabaghi,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learners` Performance in Tailor-Made Tests , 2008 .

[27]  Shannon Sauro,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF L2 GRAMMAR , 2009 .

[28]  J. Schumann Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition , 1986 .

[29]  Harriet D. Semke Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[30]  Özlem Pazvant,et al.  Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition , 2005 .

[31]  Eric Kellerman,et al.  Crosslinguistic Influence: Transfer to Nowhere? , 1995, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[32]  J. Truscott The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .

[33]  A. Jabari,et al.  THE EFFECT OF NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE EVIDENCE ON LEARNING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE BY PERSIAN SPEAKERS , 2008 .

[34]  Kevin R. Gregg SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[35]  Wayne O'Neil,et al.  Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[36]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition , 1993 .

[37]  Issues in Fossilization and Stabilization , 2009 .

[38]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course , 2014 .

[39]  Hong Kong Baptist,et al.  NOTIONS OF 'ERROR' AND APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE TREATMENT , 2012 .

[40]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX , 1973 .

[41]  J. Truscott EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER , 2004 .

[42]  Huang Shi-xiang Academic Objections in EAP Writing——A Textual Analysis of "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes" , 2006 .

[43]  P. Lennon ERROR AND THE VERY ADVANCED LEARNER , 1991 .

[44]  Ken Sheppard Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .

[45]  D. Larsen-Freeman AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MORPHEME ACQUISITION ORDER OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS , 1976 .

[46]  ZhaoHong Han,et al.  Fossilisation: From Simplicity to Complexity , 2003 .

[47]  R. Adams,et al.  L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development , 2003 .

[48]  Rick de Graaff,et al.  Investigating the Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction , 2009 .