Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe

We design, apply, and validate a methodology for correcting climate model output to produce internally consistent fields that have the same statistical intensity distribution as the observations. We refer to this as a statistical bias correction. Validation of the methodology is carried out using daily precipitation fields, defined over Europe, from the ENSEMBLES climate model dataset. The bias correction is calculated using data from 1961 to 1970, without distinguishing between seasons, and applied to seasonal data from 1991 to 2000. This choice of time periods is made to maximize the lag between calibration and validation within the ERA40 reanalysis period. Results show that the method performs unexpectedly well. Not only are the mean and other moments of the intensity distribution improved, as expected, but so are a drought and a heavy precipitation index, which depend on the autocorrelation spectra. Given that the corrections were derived without seasonal distinction and are based solely on intensity distributions, a statistical quantity oblivious of temporal correlations, it is encouraging to find that the improvements are present even when seasons and temporal statistics are considered. This encourages the application of this method to multi-decadal climate projections.

[1]  R. Katz Extreme value theory for precipitation: sensitivity analysis for climate change , 1999 .

[2]  Mark New,et al.  Surface air temperature and its changes over the past 150 years , 1999 .

[3]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[4]  Jesper Heile Christensen,et al.  Improved hydrological modeling for remote regions using a combination of observed and simulated precipitation data , 2003 .

[5]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The changing character of precipitation , 2003 .

[6]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs , 2004 .

[7]  H. Feddersen,et al.  A method for statistical downscaling of seasonal ensemble predictions , 2005 .

[8]  J. Hansen,et al.  Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies , 2006 .

[9]  James Hansen,et al.  Translating climate forecasts into agricultural terms: advances and challenges , 2006 .

[10]  Mikhail A. Semenov,et al.  Utility of dynamical seasonal forecasts in predicting crop yield , 2007 .

[11]  R. Leander,et al.  Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows , 2007 .

[12]  Jason C. Patton,et al.  A Possible Constraint on Regional Precipitation Intensity Changes under Global Warming , 2007 .

[13]  James W. Jones,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in crop model simulations using daily bias-corrected Regional Circulation Model outputs , 2007 .

[14]  J. Christensen,et al.  The HIRHAM Regional Climate Model. Version 5 (beta) , 2007 .

[15]  M. Babel,et al.  Spatial disaggregation of bias-corrected GCM precipitation for improved hydrologic simulation: Ping River Basin, Thailand , 2007 .

[16]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Regional probabilistic climate forecasts from a multithousand, multimodel ensemble of simulations , 2007 .

[17]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change , 2007 .

[18]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[19]  P. Jones,et al.  A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950-2006 , 2008 .