Model analyses of visual biofeedback training for EEG-based brain-computer interface

The primary goal of this study was to construct a simulation model of a biofeedback brain-computer interface (BCI) system to analyze the effect of biofeedback training on BCI users. A mathematical model of a man-machine visual-biofeedback BCI system was constructed to simulate a subject using a BCI system to control cursor movements. The model consisted of a visual tracking system, a thalamo-cortical model for EEG generation, and a BCI system. The BCI system in the model was realized for real experiments of visual biofeedback training. Ten sessions of visual biofeedback training were performed in eight normal subjects during a 3-week period. The task was to move a cursor horizontally across a screen, or to hold it at the screen’s center. Experimental conditions and EEG data obtained from real experiments were then simulated with the model. Three model parameters, representing the adaptation rate of gain in the visual tracking system and the relative synaptic strength between the thalamic reticular and thalamo-cortical cells in the Rolandic areas, were estimated by optimization techniques so that the performance of the model best fitted the experimental results. The serial changes of these parameters over the ten sessions, reflecting the effects of biofeedback training, were analyzed. The model simulation could reproduce results similar to the experimental data. The group mean success rate and information transfer rate improved significantly after training (56.6 to 81.1% and 0.19 to 0.76 bits/trial, respectively). All three model parameters displayed similar and statistically significant increasing trends with time. Extensive simulation with systematic changes of these parameters also demonstrated that assigning larger values to the parameters improved the BCI performance. We constructed a model of a biofeedback BCI system that could simulate experimental data and the effect of training. The simulation results implied that the improvement was achieved through a quicker adaptation rate in visual tracking gain and a larger synaptic gain from the visual tracking system to the thalamic reticular cells. In addition to the purpose of this study, the constructed biofeedback BCI model can also be used both to investigate the effects of different biofeedback paradigms and to test, estimate, or predict the performances of other newly developed BCI signal processing algorithms.

[1]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  Improving Transfer Rates in Brain Computer Interfacing: A Case Study , 2002, NIPS.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Information transfer rate in a five-classes brain-computer interface , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  N. Birbaumer slow Cortical Potentials: Plasticity, Operant Control, and Behavioral Effects , 1999 .

[5]  Paul D. Bourke,et al.  Synchronous oscillation in the cerebral cortex and object coherence: simulation of basic electrophysiological findings , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Relative contributions of intracortical and thalamo-cortical processes in the generation of alpha rhythms, revealed by partial coherence analysis. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  F. Boiten,et al.  Event-related desynchronization: the effects of energetic and computational demands. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Kimmel Hd Instrumental Conditioning of Autonomically Mediated Responses in Human Beings , 1974 .

[10]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[11]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Donchin,et al.  EEG-based communication: prospects and problems. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  H. Kimmel Instrumental conditioning of autonomically mediated responses in human beings. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[14]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Model of brain rhythmic activity , 1974, Kybernetik.

[15]  M B Sterman,et al.  Cortical-subcortical EEG correlates of suppressed motor behavior during sleep and waking in the cat. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Thierry Pun,et al.  Analysis of bit-rate definitions for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2005, CSREA HCI.

[17]  N. Miller Learning of visceral and glandular responses. , 1969, Science.

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  An EEG-driven brain-computer interface combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M. Sterman,et al.  Instrumental conditioning of sensorimotor cortex EEG spindles in the waking cat. , 1968 .

[21]  C. H. Goulden,et al.  Methods of Statistical Analysis , 1939 .

[22]  William Fuller Brown,et al.  Methods of Statistical Analysis , 1939 .

[23]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Computational model of thalamo-cortical networks: dynamical control of alpha rhythms in relation to focal attention. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  E. Fetz Operant Conditioning of Cortical Unit Activity , 1969, Science.

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  "Virtual keyboard" controlled by spontaneous EEG activity , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  E. W. Kairiss,et al.  Long-Term Potentiation in Two Synaptic Systems of the Hippocampal Brain Slice , 1989 .

[28]  Tommi Nykopp,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues for The Adaptive Brain Interface , 2001 .

[29]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[30]  E. Curran,et al.  Learning to control brain activity: A review of the production and control of EEG components for driving brain–computer interface (BCI) systems , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-Related Desynchronization , 1999 .

[32]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related dynamics of alpha band rhythms: a neuronal network model of focal ERD-surround ERS , 1999 .

[33]  M. B. Sterman,et al.  EEG biofeedback: Physiological behavior modification , 1981, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.