Does acoustic adaptation drive vertical stratification? A test in a tropical cricket assemblage

In species-rich assemblages, differential utilization of vertical space can be driven by resource availability. For animals that communicate acoustically over long distances under habitat-induced constraints, access to an effective transmission channel is a valuable resource. The acoustic adaptation hypothesis suggests that habitat acoustics imposes a selective pressure that drives the evolution of both signal structure and choice of calling sites by signalers. This predicts that species-specific signals transmit best in native habitats. In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that vertical stratification of calling heights of acoustically communicating species is driven by acoustic adaptation. This was tested in an assemblage of 12 coexisting species of crickets and katydids in a tropical wet evergreen forest. We carried out transmission experiments using natural calls at different heights from the forest floor to the canopy. We measured signal degradation using 3 different measures: total attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and envelope distortion. Different sets of species supported the hypothesis depending on which attribute of signal degradation was examined. The hypothesis was upheld by 5 species for attenuation and by 3 species each for SNR and envelope distortion. Only 1 species of 12 provided support for the hypothesis by all 3 measures of signal degradation. The results thus provided no overall support for acoustic adaptation as a driver of vertical stratification of coexisting cricket and katydid species.

[1]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[2]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  Vertical stratification in an acoustically communicating ensiferan assemblage of a tropical evergreen forest in southern India , 2007, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[3]  M. Ryan,et al.  The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs , 2000 .

[4]  W. Latimer,et al.  Behavioural adaptations of ground living bushcrickets to the properties of sound propagation in low grassland , 1986, Oecologia.

[5]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[9]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  J. Falls,et al.  A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Can the acoustic adaptation hypothesis predict the structure of Australian birdsong? , 2005, acta ethologica.

[12]  Mario Penna,et al.  Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South American temperate forest region , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  R. Ryel,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Canopy Structure in a Tropical Moist Forest , 2001 .

[14]  P. Handford,et al.  SOUND DESIGN FOR VOCALIZATIONS: QUALITY IN THE WOODS, CONSISTENCY IN THE FIELDS , 2000 .

[15]  F. Kroon,et al.  Song variation and habitat structure in the Golden Bowerbird , 2006 .

[16]  E. Date,et al.  Sound Transmission: a Basis for Dialects in Birdsong? , 1993 .

[17]  J. Fischer,et al.  THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS , 2009 .

[18]  J. Endler.  Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Habitat acoustics and primate communication , 1986, American journal of primatology.

[20]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Are high perches in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla song or listening posts? A sound transmission study. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  R. Wiley,et al.  Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  Song features and singing heights of American warblers: Maximization or optimization of distance? , 1981 .

[25]  E. Nemeth,et al.  Differential degradation of antbird songs in a neotropical rainforest: adaptation to perch height? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  P. Tubaro,et al.  Acoustic frequencies and body mass in new world doves , 1998 .

[27]  Rohini Balakrishnan,et al.  Microhabitat selection in an assemblage of crickets (Orthoptera: Ensifera) of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India , 2011 .

[28]  N. Mathevon,et al.  Song Degradation during Propagation: Importance of Song Post for the Wren Troglodytes troglodytes , 2010 .

[29]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[31]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  The Role of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ambient Noise in the Evolution of Bird Song , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Old world monkey vocalizations: adaptation to the local habitat? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  J. Vielliard,et al.  How a simple and stereotyped acoustic signal transmits individual information: the song of the White-browed Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus. , 2004, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[34]  Anthony Arak,et al.  Choice of singing sites by male bushcrickets (Tettigonia viridissima) in relation to signal propagation , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Foliage Profile by Vertical Measurements , 1969 .

[36]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[37]  K. Henwood,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Dawn Chorus: Temporal Selection for Communicatory Optimization , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[38]  J. Sueur,et al.  Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints? , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[39]  P. Waser,et al.  Experimental Studies of Primate Vocalization: Specializations for Long-distance Propagation , 2010 .

[40]  V. Couldridge,et al.  Habitat-dependent transmission of male advertisement calls in bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Pneumoridae) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  J. Tobias,et al.  SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  Evaluation of methods to estimate foliage density in the understorey of a tropical evergreen forest. , 2010 .

[44]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  THE ASSEMBLAGE OF ACOUSTICALLY COMMUNICATING CRICKETS OF A TROPICAL EVERGREEN FOREST IN SOUTHERN INDIA: CALL DIVERSITY AND DIEL CALLING PATTERNS , 2007 .

[45]  E. T. Segura,et al.  Dialect Differences in the Song of Zonotrichia capensis in the Southern Pampas: A Test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis , 1994 .

[46]  R. Alexander.  Acoustical Communication in Arthropods , 1967 .

[47]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  MALE AND FEMALE STRIDULATION IN AN INDIAN WETA (ORTHOPTERA: ANOSTOSTOMATIDAE) , 2006 .

[48]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  A DIVERSITY OF SONGS AMONG MORPHOLOGICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE KATYDIDS OF THE GENUS MECOPODA ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE) FROM SOUTHERN INDIA , 2006 .