Mechanisms of soil flow during submarine slide-pipe impact

Abstract This paper investigates submarine slide-pipe interaction through centrifuge tests and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), with particular focus on the soil flow mechanisms that occur around a suspended pipe at non-Newtonian Reynolds numbers (Renon-Newtonian) between 0.5 and 40. The centrifuge tests involve horizontal translation of a model pipe in samples of kaolin at different densities and undrained strengths whilst measuring pore pressures at the model pipe front and rear. These measurements provide insights into the pressure evolution at these pipe locations with increasing Renon-Newtonian. In the CFD simulations, the submarine slide is idealised as a single phase non-Newtonian, power law fluid that flows around a two-dimensional pipe (fully engulfed). CFD modelling demonstrates that the drag coefficient depends on both Renon-Newtonian and the power law index controlling the slide material viscous behaviour. Examination of the observed CFD flow features reveals that slide flow can separate from the pipe surface when Renon-Newtonian > ∼10. It is shown that the Renon-Newtonian at which soil flow separation occurs approximately coincides with increases in the: 1) differences in front and rear pore pressures measured in the experiments; and 2) the measured net horizontal drag pressure acting on the model pipe.

[1]  E. Achenbach,et al.  Distribution of local pressure and skin friction around a circular cylinder in cross-flow up to Re = 5 × 106 , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Raj P. Chhabra,et al.  Two-dimensional unsteady flow of power-law fluids over a cylinder , 2009 .

[3]  M. M. Zdravkovich,et al.  Conceptual overview of laminar and turbulent flows past smooth and rough circular cylinders , 1990 .

[4]  Christophe Gaudin,et al.  Interpreting T-bar tests in ultra-soft clay , 2014 .

[5]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Hydrodynamics Around Cylindrical Structures , 2006 .

[6]  B. Hawlader,et al.  Pipeline–soil–water interaction modelling for submarine landslide impact on suspended offshore pipelines , 2019, Géotechnique.

[7]  R. P. Chhabra,et al.  Steady Flow of Power Law Fluids across a Circular Cylinder , 2008 .

[8]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Centrifuge modelling of active slide–pipeline loading in soft clay , 2014 .

[9]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Interaction forces between pipelines and submarine slides — A geotechnical viewpoint , 2012 .

[10]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Numerical analysis of a cylinder moving through rate-dependent undrained soil , 2011 .

[11]  Christophe Gaudin,et al.  Strength properties of ultra-soft kaolin , 2014 .

[12]  Arash Zakeri,et al.  Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part II: Numerical analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Pipeline Embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment , 2008 .

[14]  Arash Zakeri,et al.  Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part I: Experimental investigation , 2008 .

[15]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  Applicability of power law for describing the rheology of soils of different origins and characteristics. , 2009 .

[16]  Arash Zakeri,et al.  Submarine debris flow impact on suspended (free-span) pipelines: Normal and longitudinal drag forces , 2009 .

[17]  G. Biscontin,et al.  Influence of Peripheral Velocity on Vane Shear Strength of an Artificial Clay , 2001 .