Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings*

ABSTRACT Previous research has found that children who are acquiring argument-drop languages such as Turkish and Chinese make use of syntactic frames to extend familiar verb meanings (Göksun, Küntay & Naigles, 2008; Lee & Naigles, 2008). This article investigates whether two-year-olds learning Japanese, another argument-drop language, make use of argument number and case markings in learning novel verbs. Children watched videos of novel causative and non-causative actions via Intermodal Preferential Looking. The novel verbs were presented in transitive or intransitive frames; the NPs in the transitive frames appeared ‘bare’ or with case markers. Consistent with previous findings of Morphosyntactic Bootstrapping, children who heard the novel verbs in the transitive frame with case markers reliably assigned those verbs to the novel causative actions.

[1]  Acquisition of case marking and predicate-argument structures in Japanese : a longitudinal study of languages acquisition mechanisms , 1989 .

[2]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[3]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[4]  Kunio Nishiyama,et al.  Adjectives and the Copulas in Japanese , 1999 .

[5]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  Hajime Hoji,et al.  Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese , 1985 .

[7]  C. Fisher.  Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Processes of language acquisition in children with autism: evidence from preferential looking. , 2007, Child development.

[9]  Yuriko Oshima-Takane,et al.  The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective , 2006, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[11]  Patricia M. Clancy,et al.  The acquisition of Japanese , 1986 .

[12]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability , 2008 .

[13]  E. Kako,et al.  First contact in verb acquisition: defining a role for syntax. , 1993, Child development.

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Beyond names for things : young children's acquisition of verbs , 1999 .

[15]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. , 2008, Child development.

[16]  John W. Du Bois.  The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[17]  Kenji.  Interaction-Between Particles and Word Order in the ’ Comprehension and Production of Simple Sentences in Japanese Children , 2003 .

[18]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[19]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  Non-canonical constructions in Japanese , 2001 .

[20]  コウイチ タケザワ,et al.  A configurational approach to case-marking in Japanese , 1987 .

[21]  Multiple Factors in Morphological Case-marking Errors , 2003 .

[22]  柴谷 方良,et al.  The languages of Japan , 2009 .

[23]  黒田 成幸.  Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language , 1965 .

[24]  J. S. Shibamoto.  Japanese Women's Language , 1985 .

[25]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  K Plunkett,et al.  Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. , 1998, Child development.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[28]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[29]  L. Gleitman.  The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[30]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[31]  R. Dixon,et al.  Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects , 2001 .

[32]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs , 1997 .

[33]  R. Nandakumar,et al.  Lexical principles may underlie the learning of verbs. , 1996, Child development.

[34]  M. Rispoli.  The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese , 1987 .

[35]  Matthew Rispoli,et al.  Encounters with Japanese verbs: caregiver sentences and the categorization of transitive and intransitive action verbs , 1989 .

[36]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[37]  M. Tanenhaus.  Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .

[38]  M. Shibatani,et al.  The languages of Japan , 1991 .

[39]  M. Fukuda.  Head governement and case marker drop in Japanese , 1993 .

[40]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[41]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Toddlers recognize verbs in novel situations and sentences. , 2005, Developmental science.

[42]  A. Thallaj,et al.  Guess what? , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[43]  Ann Kathleen Farmer,et al.  On the interaction of morphology and syntax , 1980 .

[44]  M. Saito.  Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications , 1985 .

[45]  Adele E Goldberg,et al.  But do we need universal grammar? Comment on Lidz et al. (2003) , 2004, Cognition.

[46]  N. Budwig,et al.  Argument realization in Hindi caregiver¿child discourse , 2005 .

[47]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[48]  J. Hayes.  Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[49]  Matthew Rispoli,et al.  The acquisition of verb subcategorization in a functionalist framework , 1991 .