Expository Text Comprehension in the Primary Grade Classroom.

This study investigates the effectiveness of an instructional program designed to teach 2nd graders how to comprehend compare-contrast expository text. Along with introducing new content (animal classification), the program emphasizes text structure via clue words, a sequence of questions, and a graphic organizer, and via the close analysis of specially constructed exemplar paragraphs. The authors compared the program with (a) more traditional instruction that focused only on the new content and (b) a no instruction control; 128 7- and 8-year-olds participated. Classroom teachers provided the instruction. The program improved students' ability to comprehend compare-contrast texts. Students were able to demonstrate transfer to uninstructed compare-contrast texts though not to text structures other than compare-contrast. Moreover, the text structure instruction did not detract from their ability to learn new content. The results provide evidence, heretofore lacking, that explicit instruction in comprehension is feasible and effective as early as the 2nd grade.

[1]  John S. de Cani,et al.  Constructing Macrostructure for Expository Text. , 1984 .

[2]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[3]  H. Swanson,et al.  Experimental Intervention Research on Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes , 1998 .

[4]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Does Text Structure/Summarization Instruction Facilitate Learning from Expository Text? Technical Report No. 394. , 1986 .

[5]  R. Lomax,et al.  Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. , 1987 .

[6]  F. Danner,et al.  Children's Understanding of Intersentence Organization in the Recall of Short Descriptive Passages. , 1976 .

[7]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .

[8]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Responsiveness‐to‐Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct , 2003 .

[9]  Mabel A. b. Bessey,et al.  Reading for understanding , 1936 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Learning to read in American schools : basal readers and content texts , 1984 .

[11]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[12]  Shirley V. Dickson.  INTEGRATING READING AND WRITING TO TEACH COMPARE-CONTRAST TEXT STRUCTURE: A RESEARCH-BASED METHODOLOGY , 1999 .

[13]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching , 1998 .

[14]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. , 1994 .

[15]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. , 1996 .

[16]  Bernice Y.L. Wong,et al.  Investigating Awareness of and Teaching Passage Organization in Learning Disabled Children , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  B. Meyer.  Identification of the Structure of prose and Its Implications for the Study of Reading and Memorya , 1975 .

[18]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Sensitivity to Text Structure in Reading and Writing: A Comparison Between Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students , 1987 .

[19]  D. R. Smith,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – Wechsler Individual Achievement Test , 2001 .

[20]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of Text. , 2001 .

[21]  Laura B. Smolkin,et al.  Supporting Comprehension Acquisition for Emerging and Struggling Readers: The Interactive Information Book Read-Aloud , 2003 .

[22]  Beyond decoding: Pictures of expository prose , 1988, Annals of dyslexia.

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[24]  Celia J. Oyler,et al.  Intertextual Connections in Read-Alouds of Information Books. , 1996 .

[25]  Michael Pressley,et al.  What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of , 2000 .

[26]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[27]  Joanna P. Williams.  Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. , 2003 .

[28]  J. Chall,et al.  Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula , 1995 .

[29]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[30]  Christine C. Pappas,et al.  Is Narrative “Primary”? Some Insights from Kindergarteners' Pretend Readings of Stories and Information Books , 1993 .

[31]  Nicholas J. Karolides.  Reader response in elementary classrooms : quest and discovery , 1997 .

[32]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  3.6 Minutes per Day: The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade. , 2000 .

[33]  Joanna P. Williams.  Improving the comprehension of disabled readers , 1998 .

[34]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[35]  Joanna P. Williams,et al.  Teaching Expository Text Structure to Young At-Risk Learners: Building the Basics of Comprehension Instruction , 2004 .

[36]  P. van den Broek,et al.  Children's and adults' memory for television stories: the role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. , 1996, Child development.

[37]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  What Reading Research Tells Us about Children with Diverse Learning Needs: Bases and Basics. The LEA Series on Special Education and Disability. , 1998 .

[38]  Robert C. Calfee,et al.  Designing Science Textbooks to Enhance Student Understanding , 1989 .

[39]  Barbara Moss.  A qualitative assessment of first graders' retelling of expository text , 1997 .

[40]  D. Perkins,et al.  Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound? , 1989 .

[41]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Text organization: Research bases. , 1998 .

[42]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Discourse Type on Recall , 1984 .

[43]  S. Sonia Gugga,et al.  Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes , 2002 .

[44]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  What's in a Story: An Approach to Comprehension and Instruction. Technical Report No. 200. , 1981 .

[45]  B. Meyer,et al.  Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. , 2002 .

[46]  Jeanne Sternlicht Chall,et al.  The reading crisis : why poor children fall behind , 1992 .

[47]  Alice Wilder,et al.  Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. , 2001 .

[48]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. , 1995 .

[49]  Alan E. Farstrup,et al.  What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction, Third Edition , 2011 .