The proton sponge hypothesis: Fable or fact?

&NA; In non‐viral gene therapy, cationic polymers and lipids are frequently used to encapsulate macromolecular therapeutics into nanoparticles. During their journey to deliver the cargo to the intended intracellular target, many biological barriers need to be overcome. One of the major bottlenecks for efficient transfection is the endosomal barrier since nanoparticles often remain entrapped inside endosomes and are trafficked towards the lysosomes where the cargo is degraded. For cationic polymers, the proton sponge hypothesis was introduced in the late '90s as a way to explain their endosomal escape properties. However, to date, no consensus has been reached in the scientific community about the validity of this hypothesis due to many contradictory reports. Here we review the sometimes conflicting reports that have been published on the proton sponge hypothesis. We also discuss membrane destabilization and polymer swelling as additional factors that might influence endosomal escape of polyplexes. Based on the key publications on this subject, we aim to launch a consensus on the role of the proton sponge hypothesis in endosomal escape.

[1]  Stefaan C. De Smedt,et al.  Cationic Polymer Based Gene Delivery Systems , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  W. Vermerris,et al.  Recent Advances in Nanomaterials for Gene Delivery—A Review , 2017, Nanomaterials.

[3]  Chih-Kuang Chen,et al.  Overcoming nonviral gene delivery barriers: perspective and future. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[4]  Sarah Seifert,et al.  Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle–mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Murali Ramamoorth,et al.  Non viral vectors in gene therapy- an overview. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[6]  A. Verkman,et al.  Chloride Concentration in Endosomes Measured Using a Ratioable Fluorescent Cl− Indicator , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Behr,et al.  Efficient gene transfer into mammalian primary endocrine cells with lipopolyamine-coated DNA. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. W. Pack,et al.  Partial Acetylation of Polyethylenimine Enhances In Vitro Gene Delivery , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  Juliane Nguyen,et al.  Nucleic acid delivery: the missing pieces of the puzzle? , 2012, Accounts of chemical research.

[10]  C. van Nostrum,et al.  Endosomal escape of polymeric gene delivery complexes is not always enhanced by polymers buffering at low pH. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[11]  R. Langer,et al.  Exploring polyethylenimine‐mediated DNA transfection and the proton sponge hypothesis , 2005, The journal of gene medicine.

[12]  Sudip Roy,et al.  Characterization of conformation and interaction of gene delivery vector polyethylenimine with phospholipid bilayer at different protonation state. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[13]  Kevin Braeckmans,et al.  Intracellular delivery of nanomaterials: how to catch endosomal escape in the act , 2014 .

[14]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Endocytic pathway rapidly delivers internalized molecules to lysosomes: an analysis of vesicle trafficking, clustering and mass transfer. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[15]  Gaurav Sahay,et al.  Endocytosis of nanomedicines. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  V. Patravale,et al.  Endosomal escape: a bottleneck in intracellular delivery. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[17]  T. Friedmann,et al.  Gene Therapy for Human Genetic Disease? , 1972, Science.

[18]  D. W. Pack,et al.  On the kinetics of polyplex endocytic trafficking: implications for gene delivery vector design. , 2002, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[19]  Jesse D. Ziebarth,et al.  Understanding the protonation behavior of linear polyethylenimine in solutions through Monte Carlo simulations. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  F. Szoka,et al.  In vitro gene delivery by degraded polyamidoamine dendrimers. , 1996, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[21]  Marc Thibault,et al.  Ionization behavior of chitosan and chitosan-DNA polyplexes indicate that chitosan has a similar capability to induce a proton-sponge effect as PEI. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[22]  Bijay Singh,et al.  Tuning the buffering capacity of polyethylenimine with glycerol molecules for efficient gene delivery: staying in or out of the endosomes. , 2015, Macromolecular bioscience.

[23]  Daniel W. Pack,et al.  Design and development of polymers for gene delivery , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  D. Dean,et al.  Extracellular and Intracellular Barriers to Non-Viral Gene Transfer , 2013 .

[25]  R. Sharma,et al.  Missing pieces in understanding the intracellular trafficking of polycation/DNA complexes. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[26]  M. Monsigny,et al.  Efficient gene transfer by histidylated polylysine/pDNA complexes. , 1999, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[27]  O. Danos,et al.  Polyethylenimine‐mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study , 2001, The journal of gene medicine.

[28]  Leaf Huang,et al.  Recent advances in nonviral vectors for gene delivery. , 2012, Accounts of chemical research.

[29]  Peter Dubruel,et al.  Endosomal Size and Membrane Leakiness Influence Proton Sponge-Based Rupture of Endosomal Vesicles. , 2018, ACS nano.

[30]  E. Wagner,et al.  Nucleic Acid Therapeutics Using Polyplexes: A Journey of 50 Years (and Beyond). , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[31]  P. Saggau,et al.  Poly(ethylenimine)-mediated transfection: a new paradigm for gene delivery. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  F. Szoka,et al.  Polyamidoamine cascade polymers mediate efficient transfection of cells in culture. , 1993, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[33]  S Moein Moghimi,et al.  The possible "proton sponge " effect of polyethylenimine (PEI) does not include change in lysosomal pH. , 2013, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[34]  Gert Storm,et al.  Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[35]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Enhancing polyethylenimine's delivery of plasmid DNA into mammalian cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  W. Hennink,et al.  Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH , 2004 .

[37]  F. Szoka,et al.  Chloride Accumulation and Swelling in Endosomes Enhances DNA Transfer by Polyamine-DNA Polyplexes* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  I. Zuhorn,et al.  Mechanism of polyplex- and lipoplex-mediated delivery of nucleic acids: real-time visualization of transient membrane destabilization without endosomal lysis. , 2013, ACS nano.

[39]  D. Scherman,et al.  A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Can Zhang,et al.  Intracellular delivery and antitumor effects of pH-sensitive liposomes based on zwitterionic oligopeptide lipids. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[41]  A. Kichler,et al.  Recent developments in nucleic acid delivery with polyethylenimines. , 2014, Advances in genetics.

[42]  Angus P R Johnston,et al.  Nanoescapology: progress toward understanding the endosomal escape of polymeric nanoparticles. , 2017, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[43]  J. Lam,et al.  Endosomal Escape Pathways for Non-Viral Nucleic Acid Delivery Systems , 2012 .

[44]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[45]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  T. Bieber,et al.  Intracellular route and transcriptional competence of polyethylenimine-DNA complexes. , 2002, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[47]  G. Battaglia,et al.  Endocytosis at the nanoscale. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[48]  D. Putnam,et al.  Design of imidazole-containing endosomolytic biopolymers for gene delivery. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.