Rowing, or crew, is a constantly evolving sport with an impressive history of equipment advancements, including the use of advanced polymer matrix composites as construction materials for boats and oars. While the use of composites undoubtedly improves the performance of the equipment, the complexity of such a material makes it difficult to establish the cause of failures observed during practice and competition. In particular, composite oars, which are ubiquitous in competitive rowing, have the potential for catastrophic failure. The present effort at investigating the failure mechanisms of a composite oar involved metallographic examinations of the fracture surface using a scanning electron microscope (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), as well as finite element stress analyses using ANSYS software. From a cross section analysis, the fiber volume percentage of the oar was measured to be 58.2%. Finite element modelling results suggested that oar failure was not the result of a discrete load, which implies that cyclic loading and structural defects were likely the primary contributing factors. A visual fracture analysis revealed surface defects introduced due to improper handling. No chemical degradation was found in the vicinity of the fracture site; however, degradation in the form of congelifraction (freeze–thaw of trapped water) was found to be a possibility. Based on the aggregate results of this investigation, recommendations for suppliers are provided in terms of manufacturing process and for sporting organizations at large with respect to improved storage and transportation of oars to reduce the likelihood of fatigue failures during training and competitions.
[1]
Jianqiao Ye,et al.
Laminated composite plates and shells:3D modelling
,
2003
.
[2]
N. Secher.
Physiological and Biomechanical Aspects of Rowing
,
1993,
Sports medicine.
[3]
M. Masuelli.
Introduction of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers − Polymers and Composites: Concepts, Properties and Processes
,
2013
.
[4]
Kyle C. Pilgeram,et al.
Device for on-the-water measurement of rowing output
,
2006
.
[5]
Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.
Chapter 9 – Laminated composite plates
,
2013
.
[6]
M. J. Bos,et al.
Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Evaluation of Structures: The Composite Materials Response
,
2009
.
[7]
K Affeld,et al.
Assessment of rowing efficiency.
,
1993,
International journal of sports medicine.
[8]
Sveinung Løset,et al.
Vibration analyses of single scull oars
,
2010
.
[9]
Mathijs J. Hofmijster,et al.
Effect of stroke rate on the distribution of net mechanical power in rowing
,
2007,
Journal of sports sciences.
[10]
D Hawkins,et al.
A new instrumentation system for training rowers.
,
2000,
Journal of biomechanics.
[11]
David Hargreaves,et al.
Simulating the fluid dynamic behaviour of oar blades in competition rowing
,
2010
.
[12]
A Millward.
A study of the forces exerted by an oarsman and the effect on boat speed.
,
1987,
Journal of sports sciences.
[13]
P. Pudlo,et al.
Instrumentation of the Concept II ergometer for optimization of the gesture of the rower
,
2020
.