Incentive Mechanisms for Internet Congestion Management: Fixed-Budget Rebate Versus Time-of-Day Pricing

Mobile data traffic has been steadily rising in the past years. This has generated a significant interest in the deployment of incentive mechanisms to reduce peak-time congestion. Typically, the design of these mechanisms requires information about user demand and sensitivity to prices. Such information is naturally imperfect. In this paper, we propose a fixed-budget rebate mechanism that gives each user a reward proportional to his percentage contribution to the aggregate reduction in peak-time demand. For comparison, we also study a time-of-day pricing mechanism that gives each user a fixed reward per unit reduction of his peak-time demand. To evaluate the two mechanisms, we introduce a game-theoretic model that captures the public good nature of decongestion. For each mechanism, we demonstrate that the socially optimal level of decongestion is achievable for a specific choice of the mechanism's parameter. We then investigate how imperfect information about user demand affects the mechanisms' effectiveness. From our results, the fixed-budget rebate pricing is more robust when the users' sensitivity to congestion is “sufficiently” convex. This feature of the fixed-budget rebate mechanism is attractive for many situations of interest and is driven by its closed-loop property, i.e., the unit reward decreases as the peak-time demand decreases.

[1]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Internet Pricing and the History of Communications , 2001, Comput. Networks.

[2]  William E. Weihl,et al.  Lottery scheduling: flexible proportional-share resource management , 1994, OSDI '94.

[3]  A. Odlyzko Internet Pricing and the History of Communications , 2012 .

[4]  Libin Jiang,et al.  Time-Dependent Network Pricing and Bandwidth Trading , 2008, NOMS Workshops 2008 - IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops.

[5]  M. Ali Khan,et al.  Chapter 46 Non-cooperative games with many players , 2002 .

[6]  R. Aumann Markets with a continuum of traders , 1964 .

[7]  Azer Bestavros,et al.  Trade & Cap: a customer-managed, market-based system for trading bandwidth allowances at a shared link , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[8]  R. Srikant,et al.  Revenue-maximizing pricing and capacity expansion in a many-users regime , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[9]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Congestion-dependent pricing of network services , 2000, TNET.

[10]  H. Young,et al.  Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications , 2015 .

[11]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  TUBE: time-dependent pricing for mobile data , 2012, SIGCOMM '12.

[12]  Peter Marbach,et al.  Analysis of a static pricing scheme for priority services , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  John A. List,et al.  Using Lotteries to Finance Public Goods: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 2007 .

[14]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue , 1990, Oper. Res..

[15]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Incentivizing time-shifting of data: a survey of time-dependent pricing for internet access , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Optimal Nonlinear Pricing for a Monopolistic Network Service Provider with Complete and Incomplete Information , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  小泉 信三 社会政策の原理 : Pigou, The economics of welfareを読む , 1923 .

[18]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Time-Dependent Broadband Pricing: Feasibility and Benefits , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[19]  John Musacchio,et al.  Congestion pricing using a raffle-based scheme , 2011, International Conference on NETwork Games, Control and Optimization (NetGCooP 2011).

[20]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Pricing under information asymmetry for a large population of users , 2007, VALUETOOLS.

[21]  Demosthenis Teneketzis,et al.  An Externalities-Based Decentralized Optimal Power Allocation Algorithm for Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[22]  M. A. Khan,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games with Many Players , 2002 .

[23]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  The Demand for Bandwidth: Evidence from the INDEX Project , 2002 .

[24]  Bruno Tuffin,et al.  Charging the Internet Without Bandwidth Reservation: An Overview and Bibliography of Mathematical Approaches , 2003, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[25]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Pricing under information asymmetry for a large population of users , 2007, Telecommun. Syst..

[26]  B. Prabhakar,et al.  An Incentive Mechanism for Decongesting the Roads : A Pilot Program in Bangalore , 2009 .

[27]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[28]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Paris metro pricing for the internet , 1999, EC '99.

[29]  User-level QoS and traffic engineering for 3G wireless 1×EV-DO systems , 2003, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[30]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Usage-based pricing of packet data generated by a heterogeneous user population , 1995, Proceedings of INFOCOM'95.

[31]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Congestion Pricing: Paying Your Way in Communication Networks , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[32]  Demosthenis Teneketzis,et al.  A game-theoretic approach to decentralized optimal power allocation for cellular networks , 2008, Telecommun. Syst..

[33]  John Morgan,et al.  Financing Public Goods by Means of Lotteries , 2000 .

[34]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Satisfiability of Elastic Demand in the Smart Grid , 2010, ArXiv.

[35]  E. Zeidler Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications: III: Variational Methods and Optimization , 1984 .