The biomechanics of one-footed vertical jump performance in unilateral trans-tibial amputees

This study investigated vertical jumps from single support for two trans-tibial amputees from a standing position. The mechanisms used to achieve flight and the compensatory mechanisms used in the production of force in the absence of plantarflexors are detailed. Two participants completed countermovement maximum vertical jumps from the prosthetic and the sound limbs. The jumps were recorded by a 7-camera 512 VICON motion analysis system integrated with a Kistler forceplate. Flight height was 5 cm jumping from the prosthetic side and 18–19 cm from the sound side. The countermovement was shallower and its duration was less on the prosthetic side compared to the sound side. The reduced and passive range of motion at the prosthesis resulted in an asymmetrical countermovement for both participants with the knee and ankle joints most affected. The duration of the push-off phase was not consistently affected. At take-off the joints on the sound side reached close to full extension while on the prosthetic side they remained more flexed. Joint extension velocity in the push-off phase was similar for both participants on the sound side, though the timing for participant 2 illustrated earlier peaks. The pattern of joint extension velocity was not a smooth proximal to distal sequence on the prosthetic side. The magnitude and timing of the inter-segment extensor moments were asymmetrical for both subjects. The power pattern was asymmetrical in both the countermovement and push-off phases; the lack of power generation at the ankle affected that produced at the remaining joints.

[1]  S. Naumann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN THE GAIT OF CONGENITAL BELOW KNEE AMPUTEES: A Comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  G J van Ingen Schenau,et al.  A comparison of one-legged and two-legged countermovement jumps. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  A. V. van Soest,et al.  Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  The effects of arms and countermovement on vertical jumping. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas,et al.  Kinesiological factors in vertical jump performance: Differences within individuals , 1997 .

[6]  E Isakov,et al.  Isokinetic and isometric strength of the thigh muscles in below-knee amputees. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  M. Pandy,et al.  Optimal muscular coordination strategies for jumping. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Coordination in vertical jumping. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. B. Davis,et al.  A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique , 1991 .

[10]  John H. Challis,et al.  An investigation of the influence of bi-lateral deficit on human jumping , 1998 .

[11]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Richard N. Hinrichs,et al.  Differences between One-Foot and Two-Foot Vertical Jump Performances , 1996 .