Response Bias and Wave Analysis of Mailed Questionnaires in Tourism Impact Assessments

Common concerns of tourism impact researchers are the rate of return on surveys and the possibility of nonresponse bias issues. Most tourism impact research uses mail surveys. In order to achieve high response rates, multiple mailings (waves) are often employed. Of concern are the differences between waves and the appropriate timing of the cutoff of mailings during the research process. This study examined the attitudinal and sociodemographic differences in three waves and a check of nonresponse bias. The study suggests that no differences exist in the waves, yet some differences exist between respondents and nonrespondents. Methodological implications are identified and discussed.

[1]  S. Lankford.  An analysis of resident preferences, attitudes and opinions toward tourism and rural regional development in the Columbia River Gorge , 1992 .

[2]  R. Gitelson,et al.  Research note: The impact of incentives and three forms of postage on mail survey response rates , 1993 .

[3]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Comments on the Importance of Late Respondent and Nonrespondent Data from Mail Surveys , 1981 .

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences , 1981 .

[5]  Michael A. Tarrant,et al.  Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self reports of angling participation , 1993 .

[6]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[7]  J. Ray,et al.  Maximizing the response rate in surveys may be a mistake , 1987 .

[8]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[9]  R. Ditton,et al.  Homogeneity across mail survey waves: a replicated study. , 1992 .

[10]  Stephen F. McCool,et al.  Community Attachment and Attitudes Toward Tourism Development , 1994 .

[11]  I. H. Becker,et al.  Nonrespondents in homogeneous groups: implications for mailed surveys. , 1983 .

[12]  W. Goudy.  Interim Response to a Mail Questionnaire: Impacts on Variable Relationships* , 1978 .

[13]  W. Hammitt,et al.  Response bias and the need for extensive mail questionnaire follow-ups among selected recreation samples. , 1982 .

[14]  Gary E. Machlis,et al.  Response rates and mail recreation survey results: how much is enough? , 1991 .

[15]  G. Buhyoff,et al.  Mailed questionnaire surveys and the reluctant respondent: an empirical examination of differences between early and late respondents. , 1980 .

[16]  S. Lankford,et al.  Developing a tourism impact attitude scale , 1994 .

[17]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[18]  Willis J. Goudy,et al.  Nonresponse Effects on Relationships Between Variables , 1976 .

[19]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  How Serious Is Nonresponse Bias in Advertising Conversion Research? , 1984 .

[20]  F. Ling,et al.  Follow-up in International Tourism Mail Surveys , 1992 .