[Treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis with radial derotational osteotomy and local subcutaneous pedicled fat flap filling in fusion area].

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of local subcutaneous pedicled fat flap filling and separation of the synostosis area associated with radial shortening osteotomy and plate internal fixation for the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis. Methods Between February 2014 and June 2018, 36 patients (41 sides) with congenital radioulnar synostosis were analyzed retrospectively, including 21 males and 15 females, aged 2.5-4.5 years with an average of 3.1 years. The fixed pronation deformity of the forearm ranged from 30° to 90° with an average of 71.6°, and the range of motion of the elbow flexion was 120°-135° with an average of 128.2°. According to the Cleary-Omer classification, there were 8 sides of type Ⅱ, 17 sides of type Ⅲ, and 16 sides of type Ⅳ. All patients were treated by local subcutaneous pedicled fat flap filling and separation of the synostosis area associated with radial shortening osteotomy and plate internal fixation. The range of motion of the elbow, muscle strength, joint stability, and patient discomfort were evaluated by using the Broberg and Morrey elbow scoring system preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, the ability for daily living of the affected limb was evaluated by using the Failla grading standard. Results Radial nerve palsy occurred in 3 cases, and nerve function recovered at 2-4 weeks after operation. All the 36 cases were followed up 6-52 months, with an average of 38 months. All osteotomy sites healed, the healing time was 5-12 weeks (mean, 6.3 weeks), and the pedicled fat flap between the radius and ulna survived when the internal fixation was taken. At last follow-up, the flexion range of motion of elbow joint was not decreased, and the pronation and supination range of motion of forearm were improved. The elbow flexion range of motion was 125°-135° with an average of 132.4°. The pronation range of motion of forearm was 15°-45° with an average of 30.1°, and the supination range of motion of forearm was 10°-40° with an average of 22.6°. At last follow-up, the Broberg and Morrey elbow scores increased from the preoperative 85.6±1.0 to 91.8±1.8, showing significant difference ( t=25.593, P=0.000). Moreover, the results were good in 3 sides, fair in 9 sides, and poor in 29 sides according to the Failla grading standard before operation, with an excellent and good rate of 7.3%. At last follow-up, the results were excellent in 6 sides, good in 28 sides, and fair in 7 sides, with an excellent and good rate of 82.9%, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative value ( Z=-5.781, P=0.000). Conclusion The application of local subcutaneous pedicled fat flap filling and separation of the synostosis area associated with radial shortening osteotomy and plate internal fixation is an effective surgical method for the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis. It can restore the partial rotation function of the forearm and improve the quality of life of children.

[1]  Jiu-hui Han,et al.  Efficacy and feasibility of proximal radioulnar derotational osteotomy and internal fixation for the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[2]  Büşra Kepenek-Varol,et al.  Is short-term hand therapy effective in a child with congenital radioulnar synostosis? A case report. , 2019, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[3]  T. Murase,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of deformities of the radius and ulna in congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis , 2018, Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume).

[4]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Long-term results after a free vascularized adipofascial graft for congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis with an average follow-up of 10 years: a series of four cases. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  Sherif N. G. Bishay Minimally invasive single-session double-level rotational osteotomy of the forearm bones to correct fixed pronation deformity in congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis , 2016, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[6]  G. Garg,et al.  Surgical outcome of delayed presentation of congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis , 2015, SICOT-J.

[7]  J. H. Chung,et al.  One-stage rotational osteotomy for congenital radioulnar synostosis , 2015, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[8]  S. Koh,et al.  Single osteotomy at the radial diaphysis for congenital radioulnar synostosis. , 2014, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Modified osteotomy (Kanaya’s procedure) for congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis with posterior dislocation of radial head , 2014, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[10]  S. Ughade,et al.  Results of Single-staged Rotational Osteotomy in a Child With Congenital Proximal Radioulnar Synostosis: Subjective and Objective Evaluation , 2014, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[11]  N. Hung Derotational osteotomy of the proximal radius and the distal ulna for congenital radioulnar synostosis , 2008, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[12]  A. Minami,et al.  The use of pedicled posterior interosseous fat graft for mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis: a case report. , 2004, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  Mortazavi S.M.J.,et al.  Congenital radioulnar synostosis: A report of 11 cases and review of literature , 2002 .

[14]  F. Kanaya Mobilization of congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis: a technical detail. , 1997, Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery.

[15]  G. Mignani,et al.  A critical review of the surgical treatment of congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. , 1987, Italian journal of orthopaedics and traumatology.

[16]  L. Ricciardi [Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis]. , 1969, Minerva ortopedica.