Exploring Community-Oriented Approaches in Demand Side Management Projects in Europe

This paper seeks to investigate if the theoretical and political trends towards a more collective dimension of energy use are reflected in the design and development of demand side management (DSM) pilot projects in Europe. Specifically, the paper analyses DSM projects in the database of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission to capture signs of a new attention towards the wider context in which consumers live and towards the social dimension associated with energy consumption. To this end, the paper investigates the projects’ scope (in terms of project’s partners, end-use sectors and targeted services) as well as the consumer engagement strategies that projects use. These elements reflect the projects’ consideration for the socio-economic dimension of the community where the pilots take place and their inclination to build on community dynamics. The analysis shows that DSM projects in the EU are increasingly being designed and developed with a collegial approach to energy consumption in mind, although an integrated approach is still missing. In addition, research is still needed to link the use of this innovative approach to project results. A closer look at the developments and results of these projects can help to identify what works and what doesn’t in real life experiences, thus supporting effective policy making at the EU and national level.

[1]  Tineke van der Schoor,et al.  Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy , 2015 .

[2]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[3]  Rodrigo Palma-Behnke,et al.  A methodology for community engagement in the introduction of renewable based smart microgrid , 2011 .

[4]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems , 2016 .

[5]  L. Steg,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals , 2014 .

[6]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .

[7]  Steffen Wirth,et al.  Communities matter: Institutional preconditions for community renewable energy , 2014 .

[8]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[9]  Tom Roberts,et al.  Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications , 2016 .

[10]  A. Petersen,et al.  Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities , 2015 .

[11]  Martin Anda,et al.  Smart metering for residential energy efficiency: The use of community based social marketing for behavioural change and smart grid introduction , 2014 .

[12]  Ettore Francesco Bompard,et al.  Smart grid as multi-layer interacting system for complex decision makings , 2014 .

[13]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[14]  Angelina H.M.E. Reinders,et al.  Empowering the end-user in smart grids: Recommendations for the design of products and services , 2013 .

[15]  M. Wolsink The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects , 2016 .

[17]  Anna Maria Mengolini,et al.  The social dimension of Smart Grids: Consumer, community, society , 2013 .

[18]  Salvatore Ruggiero,et al.  Realizing the social acceptance of community renewable energy: a process-outcome analysis of stakeholder influence , 2016 .

[19]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[20]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[21]  Fulli Gianluca,et al.  Smart Grid projects in Europe:Lessons learned and current developments 2012 update , 2013 .

[22]  Peter G. Robertson,et al.  Public views on renewable energy in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States: Distinct attitudes, exposure, and other key predictors of wind energy ☆ , 2016 .

[23]  Sufang Zhang,et al.  Demand-side management (DSM) in the context of China's on-going power sector reform , 2017 .

[24]  Daphne Ngar-yin Mah,et al.  The role of the state in sustainable energy transitions: A case study of large smart grid demonstration projects in Japan , 2013 .

[25]  P. Warren A review of demand-side management policy in the UK , 2014 .

[26]  Taha Selim Ustun,et al.  A survey on behind the meter energy management systems in smart grid , 2017 .

[27]  Fulli Gianluca,et al.  Smart Grid Projects in Europe - Lessons Learned and Current Developments , 2011 .

[28]  P. Jiang,et al.  Building low carbon communities in China: The role of individual’s behaviour change and engagement , 2013 .

[29]  Anonymous,et al.  Full report , 2019 .

[30]  Fiona Bradley,et al.  Energy autonomy in sustainable communities—A review of key issues , 2012 .

[31]  Pieter Valkering,et al.  Fostering Residential Demand Response through Dynamic Pricing Schemes: A Behavioural Review of Smart Grid Pilots in Europe , 2016 .

[32]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Resilient communities: sustainabilities in transition , 2012 .