Patient-assisted teledermatology practice: what is it? When, where, and how it is applied?

Recent teledermatology practice has been focused on different models made possible by robust advances in information technology leading to consistent interaction between the patient and health care professionals. Patient-assisted teledermatology practice also called patient-enabled teledermatology or home based teledermatology is one such novel model. There is a lack of scientific literature and substantive reviews on patient-assisted teledermatology practice. The present article reviews several studies and surveys on patient-assisted teledermatology practice and outlines its advantages and barriers to clinical utility and analyses the potentiality of this concept. Incorporating patient-assisted teledermatology practice as a novel model in the revised classification of teledermatology practice is proposed. In patient-assisted teledermatology, the patient can upload his/her clinical images as a first contact with the dermatologist or an initial face-to-face examination can be followed by teledermatology consultations. The latter method is well suited to chronic diseases such as psoriasis, vitiligo, and leg ulcers, which may need frequent follow-up entailing significant costs and time, particularly in the elderly. Teledermatology may also be used by the treating dermatologist to seek expert opinion for difficult cases. Studies have demonstrated the importance and usability of the concept of patient-assisted teledermatology practice. Various teledermatology care models are available and the appropriate model should be chosen depending on whether the clinical situation is that of easily diagnosed cases ("spotters"), chronic cases or doubtful cases and difficult-to-manage cases.

[1]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Patient perceptions about a novel form of patient-assisted teledermatology. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[2]  Karen Edison,et al.  Pediatric Teledermatology—A Survey of Current Use , 2008, Pediatric dermatology.

[3]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  R Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Feasibility and acceptance of telemedicine for wound care in patients with chronic leg ulcers , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  Gr Kanthraj,et al.  Classification and design of teledermatology practice: What dermatoses? Which technology to apply? , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[6]  M. Plana,et al.  [Store-and-forward teledermatology: assessment of validity in a series of 2000 observations]. , 2011, Actas dermo-sifiliograficas.

[7]  G. Kanthraj,et al.  Comparison of computer-aided design and rule of nines methods in the evaluation of the extent of body involvement in cutaneous lesions. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  Diagnostic value of written referral and/or images for skin lesions , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  G. Romero,et al.  Randomized controlled trial comparing store‐and‐forward teledermatology alone and in combination with web‐camera videoconferencing , 2010, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[10]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system , 2009, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  J. Kvedar,et al.  A randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of online follow-up visits in the management of acne. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Teledermatology: an update. , 2008, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[13]  K. Cordoro,et al.  Pediatric Teledermatology Consultations: Relationship Between Provided Data and Diagnosis , 2013, Pediatric dermatology.

[14]  Dieter Hayn,et al.  A mobile-phone based teledermatology system to support self-management of patients suffering from psoriasis , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Mobile teledermatology helping patients control high‐need acne: a randomized controlled trial , 2015, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[16]  G. Reiber,et al.  Teledermatology patient satisfaction in the Pacific Northwest. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Concordance and time estimation of store-and-forward mobile teledermatology compared to classical face-to-face consultation. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[18]  Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Pilot study using teledermatology to manage high-need patients with psoriasis. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Teledermatological monitoring of psoriasis patients on biologic therapy. , 2011, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[20]  Steven C Grambow,et al.  Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[21]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high‐need patients with psoriasis , 2012, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[22]  J. M. Ríos-Yuil,et al.  [Correlation between face-to-face assessment and telemedicine for the diagnosis of skin disease in case conferences]. , 2012 .

[23]  C Massone,et al.  The additive value of second opinion teleconsulting in the management of patients with challenging inflammatory, neoplastic skin diseases: a best practice model in dermatology? , 2007, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[24]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Standardizing training for psoriasis measures: effectiveness of an online training video on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index assessment by physician and patient raters. , 2013, JAMA dermatology.

[25]  B Kvammen,et al.  A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  Nam K Tran,et al.  Development of novel smart device based application for serial wound imaging and management. , 2013, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[27]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Geriatric teledermatology: store‐and‐forward vs. face‐to‐face examination , 2011, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[28]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[29]  H. Drexler,et al.  Spoilt for choice – evaluation of two different scoring systems for early hand eczema in teledermatological examinations , 2010, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Teledermatological monitoring of leg ulcers in cooperation with home care nurses. , 2007, Archives of dermatology.

[31]  I. Frieden,et al.  Pediatric teledermatology: observations based on 429 consults. , 2010, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology.

[32]  C. L. Wen,et al.  Accuracy of store-and-forward diagnosis in leprosy , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[33]  Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj,et al.  Store and forward teledermatology. , 2007, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[34]  N. Shaw,et al.  Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  Carrie L Kovarik,et al.  HIV-positive patients in Botswana state that mobile teledermatology is an acceptable method for receiving dermatology care , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[36]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[37]  Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj,et al.  Newer insights in teledermatology practice. , 2011, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[38]  J. Ribas,et al.  Agreement between dermatological diagnoses made by live examination compared to analysis of digital images. , 2010, Anais brasileiros de dermatologia.

[39]  The integration of the internet, mobile phones, digital photography, and computer-aided design software to achieve telemedical wound measurement and care. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[40]  Telemedicine in wound care , 2008, International wound journal.

[41]  D. Brousseau,et al.  Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[42]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  Mobile applications in dermatology. , 2013, JAMA dermatology.

[43]  Harvey N Mayrovitz,et al.  Wound Areas by Computerized Planimetry of Digital Images: Accuracy and Reliability , 2009, Advances in skin & wound care.

[44]  R. Braun,et al.  Telemedical wound care using a new generation of mobile telephones: a feasibility study. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[45]  D. Eedy,et al.  Teledermatology: a review , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[46]  Steven C Grambow,et al.  Store-and-forward teledermatology results in similar clinical outcomes to conventional clinic-based care , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[47]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Wound Teleconsultation in Patients with Chronic Leg Ulcers , 2005, Dermatology.