An experiment on rider stability while mounting: Comparing middle-aged and elderly cyclists on pedelecs and conventional bicycles.

Pedelecs, popular among elderly cyclists, are associated with a higher injury risk than conventional bicycles. About 17% of these injuries are due to falls while (dis)mounting. Using instrumented bicycles, this study aimed to identify factors contributing to the stability of self-chosen mounting methods in four user groups: 30-45 versus 65+ years of age and males versus females. Mounting stability on pedelecs was compared with that on conventional bicycles, in controlled experimental setting (task in a fenced off parking lot) but also in real traffic conditions (traffic light turns green). Two mounting phases were differentiated: phase 1 as the transition from 'earth bound' to 'balance' and phase 2 as the acceleration to achieve harmonized cycling. Stability was operationalised in terms of the duration of these phases: the shorter their duration, the higher the stability. Pedelecs were shown to be less stable in phase 1 than conventional bicycles, irrespective of user group. For all user groups, only in phase 2 the advantages of electrical support kicked in. Results obtained in traffic conditions confirmed the patterns obtained in the controlled setting, with as only difference a lower speed in traffic conditions, which held for both mounting phases and bicycle types. Also measures of physical limitations due to low muscle strength were shown only to be compensated for by pedal support in phase 2 and not in phase 1. Further, mounting characteristics affected pedelec stability in phase 1 and not in phase 2. Higher stability was associated with a) starting while seated and b) using the pedal to push off. Although, these mounting characteristics were confounded with age, gender, and muscle strength, the pattern of results still suggest certain mounting techniques to be more beneficial for pedelecs. The results further illustrate the importance of a deeper understanding of the interactions of bicycle types and user groups on critical manoeuvres and their potential contribution to the optimisation of pedelec design and the training of safe mounting techniques.

[1]  R. Davidse,et al.  Challenges in reducing bicycle casualties with high volume cycle use: lessons from the Netherlands , 2015 .

[2]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Lateral dynamics of a bicycle with a passive rider model: stability and controllability , 2012 .

[3]  M. Visser,et al.  Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. , 2013, Epidemiologic reviews.

[4]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  A. Ruina,et al.  A Bicycle Can Be Self-Stable Without Gyroscopic or Caster Effects , 2011, Science.

[6]  R. Dubbeldam,et al.  The different ways to get on and off a bicycle for young and old , 2017 .

[7]  Ingrid J.M. Hendriksen,et al.  Elektrisch Fietsen : marktonderzoek en verkenning toekomstmogelijkheden , 2008 .

[8]  J. Smit,et al.  Balance and mobility performance as treatable risk factors for recurrent falling in older persons. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Michiel Christoph,et al.  Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[11]  G. M. Bonnema,et al.  Cycling strategies of young and older cyclists. , 2016, Human movement science.

[12]  A L Schwab,et al.  The safety of electrically assisted bicycles compared to classic bicycles. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  B. Saveman,et al.  Single injury incidents among pedestrians and biscyclists in northern Sweden : safety and preventive issues , 2012 .

[14]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Trends in human reliability analysis , 1985 .

[15]  Niels Bos,et al.  Serious road injuries in The Netherlands dissected , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[17]  Katja Schleinitz,et al.  Pedelec-Naturalistic Cycling Study , 2014 .

[18]  J S Rietman,et al.  SOFIE, a bicycle that supports older cyclists? , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  M J Boele-Vos,et al.  Crashes involving cyclists aged 50 and over in the Netherlands: An in-depth study. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  H. Stipdonk,et al.  Health burden of serious road injuries in the Netherlands , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The making of an expert. , 2007, Harvard business review.