Bursting Bubbles and Bilayers

This paper discusses various interactions between ultrasound, phospholipid monolayer-coated gas bubbles, phospholipid bilayer vesicles, and cells. The paper begins with a review of microbubble physics models, developed to describe microbubble dynamic behavior in the presence of ultrasound, and follows this with a discussion of how such models can be used to predict inertial cavitation profiles. Predicted sensitivities of inertial cavitation to changes in the values of membrane properties, including surface tension, surface dilatational viscosity, and area expansion modulus, indicate that area expansion modulus exerts the greatest relative influence on inertial cavitation. Accordingly, the theoretical dependence of area expansion modulus on chemical composition - in particular, poly (ethylene glyclol) (PEG) - is reviewed, and predictions of inertial cavitation for different PEG molecular weights and compositions are compared with experiment. Noteworthy is the predicted dependence, or lack thereof, of inertial cavitation on PEG molecular weight and mole fraction. Specifically, inertial cavitation is predicted to be independent of PEG molecular weight and mole fraction in the so-called mushroom regime. In the “brush” regime, however, inertial cavitation is predicted to increase with PEG mole fraction but to decrease (to the inverse 3/5 power) with PEG molecular weight. While excellent agreement between experiment and theory can be achieved, it is shown that the calculated inertial cavitation profiles depend strongly on the criterion used to predict inertial cavitation. This is followed by a discussion of nesting microbubbles inside the aqueous core of microcapsules and how this significantly increases the inertial cavitation threshold. Nesting thus offers a means for avoiding unwanted inertial cavitation and cell death during imaging and other applications such as sonoporation. A review of putative sonoporation mechanisms is then presented, including those involving microbubbles to deliver cargo into a cell, and those - not necessarily involving microubbles - to release cargo from a phospholipid vesicle (or reverse sonoporation). It is shown that the rate of (reverse) sonoporation from liposomes correlates with phospholipid bilayer phase behavior, liquid-disordered phases giving appreciably faster release than liquid-ordered phases. Moreover, liquid-disordered phases exhibit evidence of two release mechanisms, which are described well mathematically by enhanced diffusion (possibly via dilation of membrane phospholipids) and irreversible membrane disruption, whereas liquid-ordered phases are described by a single mechanism, which has yet to be positively identified. The ability to tune release kinetics with bilayer composition makes reverse sonoporation of phospholipid vesicles a promising methodology for controlled drug delivery. Moreover, nesting of microbubbles inside vesicles constitutes a truly “theranostic” vehicle, one that can be used for both long-lasting, safe imaging and for controlled drug delivery.

[1]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[2]  S. Payne,et al.  The effect of temperature and viscoelasticity on cavitation dynamics during ultrasonic ablation. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Lewin,et al.  Ultrasound-induced transport across lipid bilayers: Influence of phase behavior , 2011 .

[4]  D. Lohse,et al.  Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical shape oscillations of coated microbubbles in contact with a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Michiel Postema,et al.  Sonoporation at a low mechanical index , 2011 .

[7]  S. Wrenn,et al.  Coencapsulation of lipid microbubbles within polymer microcapsules for contrast applications , 2011 .

[8]  N. Dan,et al.  Diffusion through colloidosome shells. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[9]  S. Shoham,et al.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  William D O'Brien,et al.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Hossack,et al.  Analysis of in vitro transfection by sonoporation using cationic and neutral microbubbles. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  N. Dan,et al.  Controlling surface porosity and release from hydrogels using a colloidal particle coating. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  Ayache Bouakaz,et al.  Theoretical investigation of shear stress generated by a contrast microbubble on the cell membrane as a mechanism for sonoporation. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  William D O'Brien,et al.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. Wrenn,et al.  Determination of microbubble cavitation threshold pressure as function of shell chemistry , 2010 .

[17]  E. Stride,et al.  Cavitation and contrast: The use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[18]  J. Kost,et al.  Ultrasound, liposomes, and drug delivery: principles for using ultrasound to control the release of drugs from liposomes. , 2009, Chemistry and physics of lipids.

[19]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: Influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles , 2009 .

[20]  A. Schroeder,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Drug Release from Liposomes by Low Frequency Ultrasound , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  S. Wrenn,et al.  Controlling cavitation for controlled release , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[22]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Novel microbubble preparation technologies , 2008 .

[24]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Yun Zhou,et al.  The size of sonoporation pores on the cell membrane , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[26]  R. Misra,et al.  Biomaterials , 2008 .

[27]  J. Ophir,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[28]  E Stride,et al.  The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Angela C. Brown,et al.  Measuring raft size as a function of membrane composition in PC-based systems: Part II--ternary systems. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  Angela C. Brown,et al.  Effect of membrane microheterogeneity and domain size on fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[33]  D. Dalecki WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: bioeffects of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  W. Nyborg WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: mechanisms for the interaction of ultrasound. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  Andrzej Nowicki,et al.  In vitro ultrasound-mediated leakage from phospholipid vesicles. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[36]  W. Nyborg Ultrasound, contrast agents and biological cells; a simplified model for their interaction during in vitro experiments. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  K. Koshiyama,et al.  Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves: molecular dynamics simulations. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[38]  P. Dayton,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed imaging of an ultrasound-driven bubble in contact with a wall: “Narcissus” effect and resolved acoustic streaming , 2006 .

[40]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[41]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[43]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[44]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[45]  Junru Wu,et al.  Application of liposomes to sonoporation. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[47]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Thierry Bettinger,et al.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[49]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Determining thresholds for contrast agent collapse , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[50]  Juan M. Lopez,et al.  Influence of coexisting phases on the surface dilatational viscosity of Langmuir monolayers. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  E. Kimmel,et al.  Shear stress induced by a gas bubble pulsating in an ultrasonic field near a wall , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[52]  C. Visser,et al.  Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy. , 2004, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[53]  James L. Thomas,et al.  Factors affecting responsivity of unilamellar liposomes to 20 kHz ultrasound. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[54]  M. Longo,et al.  Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[55]  Mark A. Borden,et al.  Oxygen Permeability of Fully Condensed Lipid Monolayers , 2004 .

[56]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[57]  Siewert J Marrink,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophilic pores in lipid bilayers. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[58]  David Needham,et al.  Test of the Epstein-Plesset model for gas microparticle dissolution in aqueous media: effect of surface tension and gas undersaturation in solution. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[59]  J. Leroux,et al.  Study of molecular interactions between a phospholipidic layer and a pH-sensitive polymer using the Langmuir balance technique. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[60]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[61]  C. Cain,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[62]  David Needham,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Polycrystalline Phospholipid Monolayer Shells: Novel Solid Microparticles , 2003 .

[63]  D. Marsh,et al.  Lipid membranes with grafted polymers: physicochemical aspects. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[64]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[65]  Gregory M. Troup,et al.  Detection and characterization of laterally phase separated cholesterol domains in model lipid membranes , 2003 .

[66]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[67]  D. Thompson,et al.  Size and structure of spontaneously forming liposomes in lipid/PEG-lipid mixtures. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[68]  M. Longo,et al.  Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .

[69]  A. Gil,et al.  Surface pressure-area isotherms and fluorescent behavior of phospholipids containing labeled pyrene. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[70]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of microbubbles. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[71]  Junru Wu,et al.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  D. Marsh Elastic constants of polymer-grafted lipid membranes. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[73]  Mamoru Tamura,et al.  Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: A New Tool for Probing the Microenvironment of the Internal Space of Organelles , 2000 .

[74]  E. Evans,et al.  Effect of chain length and unsaturation on elasticity of lipid bilayers. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[75]  J. Crane,et al.  Persistence of phase coexistence in disaturated phosphatidylcholine monolayers at high surface pressures. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[76]  D. Hammer,et al.  Polymersomes: tough vesicles made from diblock copolymers. , 1999, Science.

[77]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[78]  J. G. Abbott,et al.  Rationale and derivation of MI and TI--a review. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[79]  N de Jong,et al.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[80]  I. Szleifer,et al.  Spontaneous liposome formation induced by grafted poly(ethylene oxide) layers: theoretical prediction and experimental verification. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  E. Evans,et al.  Elasticity of ``Fuzzy'' Biomembranes , 1997 .

[82]  Lars Hoff,et al.  Acoustic properties of shell-encapsulated, gas-filled ultrasound contrast agents , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[83]  J. Weaver,et al.  Transdermal transport efficiency during skin electroporation and iontophoresis , 1996 .

[84]  D. Needham,et al.  Range and magnitude of the steric pressure between bilayers containing phospholipids with covalently attached poly(ethylene glycol). , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[85]  T. McIntosh,et al.  Structure and phase behavior of lipid suspensions containing phospholipids with covalently attached poly(ethylene glycol). , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[86]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[87]  N. Dan Brush adsorption from polydisperse solutions , 1994 .

[88]  E. Kaler,et al.  Phospholipase C-induced aggregation and fusion of cholesterol-lecithin small unilamellar vesicles. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[89]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[90]  D. Wasan,et al.  Response to Kostas S. Avramidis' "Comments on 'Measurement of Interfacial Dilatational Viscosity at High Rates of Interface Expansion Using the Maximum Bubble Pressure Method'" , 1993 .

[91]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[92]  P. G. de Gennes,et al.  Polymers at an interface; a simplified view , 1987 .

[93]  H. G. Flynn Cavitation dynamics: II. Free pulsations and models for cavitation bubbles , 1975 .

[94]  L. Scriven,et al.  Dynamics of a fluid interface Equation of motion for Newtonian surface fluids , 1960 .

[95]  J. Westwater,et al.  The Mathematics of Diffusion. , 1957 .

[96]  S. Wrenn,et al.  Influence of Microbubble Shell Chemistry on the Destruction Threshold of Ultrasound Contrast Agent Microbubbles , 2012 .

[97]  Elisa E Konofagou,et al.  Theranostic Gd(III)-lipid microbubbles for MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[98]  A. Maghnouj,et al.  Microcapsules: Reverse Sonoporation and Long-lasting, Safe Contrast , 2012 .

[99]  W. O’Brien Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[100]  Angela C. Brown,et al.  Measuring raft size as a function of membrane composition in PC-based systems: Part 1--binary systems. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[101]  Gregory M. Troup,et al.  Estimating the size of laterally phase separated cholesterol domains in model membranes with Förster resonance energy transfer: a simulation study , 2004 .

[102]  Junru Wu,et al.  Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[103]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[104]  D. Brown,et al.  Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. , 1998, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[105]  G. Haar The Acoustic Bubble , 1996 .

[106]  W. Nyborg,et al.  Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[107]  D. Wasan,et al.  Measurement of interfacial dilatational viscosity at high rates of interface expansion using the maximum bubble pressure method. I. Gas—liquid surface , 1992 .

[108]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[109]  S. Nir,et al.  Aggregation and fusion of phospholipid vesicles , 1983 .

[110]  N. F. Djabbarah,et al.  Dilational viscoelastic properties of fluid interfaces—III Mixed surfactant systems , 1982 .

[111]  L. Crum Acoustic Cavitation , 1982 .

[112]  A. Vercelli,et al.  Ultrasound in medicine and biology. , 1971, The Medical journal of Australia.