Quality, Quantity, and Age: The Careers of Ten Distinguished Psychologists

The longitudinal relationship between quality and quantity of productive output is examined over the careers of ten recipients of the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award. Four alternative models of this relationship-expertise-acquisition, youthful-enthusiasm, peak-age, and constant-probability-of-success-yield distinctive predictions regarding 1) how the ratio of major contributions to total output changes as a career advances and 2) the developmental association between major and minor works over consecutive time periods. The quality of a publication was assessed by the citations it earned in the professional literature. The results endorsed the constant-probability-of-success model (both across and within careers). Not only does confirmation of this model provide support for Campbell's blind-variation-and-selective-retention theory of creative thought, but it additionally has important implications for understanding the role of age and chance in the careers of successful psychologists.

[1]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[2]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[3]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. , 1980 .

[4]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Productivity and scholarly impact (citations) of British, Canadian, and U.S. departments of psychology (1975). , 1978 .

[5]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process , 1984 .

[6]  D. Simonton.  Age and Literary Creativity , 1975 .

[7]  J. Lyons.  Chronological age, professional age, and eminence in psychology. , 1968, The American psychologist.

[8]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, Creativity, and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries , 1984 .

[9]  C. Myers.  Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. , 1970 .

[10]  Duncan MacRae,et al.  Growth and Decay Curves in Scientific Citations , 1969 .

[11]  H. Inhaber,et al.  Quality of Research and the Nobel Prizes , 1976 .

[12]  W. Dennis,et al.  Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. , 1966, Journal of gerontology.

[13]  D. Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity, age, and stress: a biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  P. Allison,et al.  Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage , 1974 .

[15]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Age, aging, and age structure in science , 1968 .

[16]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[17]  Stephen Cole,et al.  MEASURING THE QUALITY OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH : PROBLEMS IN THE USE OF THE SCIENCE CITATION ZNDEX , 1971 .

[18]  Leonard Zusne,et al.  Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. , 1976 .

[19]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. , 1980 .

[20]  H. Lehman,et al.  The psychologist's most creative years. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[21]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  Career Age and Research-Professional Activities of Academic Scientists. Tests of Alternative Nonlinear Models and Some Implications for Higher Education Faculty Policies. , 1977 .

[22]  Wayne Dennis,et al.  The age decrement in outstanding scientific contributions: Fact or artifact? , 1958 .

[23]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Cross-sectional time-series experiments: Some suggested statistical analyses , 1977 .

[24]  Legal Responsibility in Old Age , 1874, The British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review.

[25]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Chance and consensus in peer review. , 1981, Science.

[26]  Wayne Dennis,et al.  Productivity among American psychologists. , 1954 .

[27]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Age and Scientific Performance , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  A Method of Predicting Nobel Prizewinners in Chemistry , 1978 .

[29]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.