Grain breakage criteria for discrete element models of sand crushing under one-dimensional compression

Abstract Frac sand consisting of quartz grains is widely used in hydraulic fracturing of tight shales to prop fractures open. However, the sand can be crushed by high compressive stress acting on the fractures and this reduces the fracture conductivity. In practice, a one-dimensional compression test is widely used to evaluate the crushing resistance of frac sand. This paper presents the results of discrete element modelling of sand crushing calibrated with laboratory data from one-dimensional compression tests. Three criteria for grain breakage that incorporate grain-size dependent particle strength and failure under shearing/tensile conditions were implemented and evaluated in PFC2D. An innovative aspect is linking the breakage of a clustered particle under multiple contacts in PFC2D to grain breakage criteria to examine the applicability of these breakage criteria in grain crushing. A macro-scale calibration demonstrates how incorporation of particle breakage algorithms can allow the PFC2D model to capture the change in particle size distribution as well as the non-linear stress-strain response of sand under high compressive stresses. The calibrated grain breakage criterion was used to study the crushing behaviour and permeability evolution of a mesh 20/40 Jordan frac sand.

[1]  A. Gens,et al.  DEM modelling of cone penetration tests in a double-porosity crushable granular material , 2016 .

[2]  Robert P. Chapuis,et al.  Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand and gravel using effective diameter and void ratio , 2004 .

[3]  A. A. Mirghasemi,et al.  Numerical simulation of breakage of two-dimensional polygon-shaped particles using discrete element method , 2006 .

[4]  Terrence T. Palisch,et al.  How To Use and Misuse Proppant Crush Tests: Exposing the Top 10 Myths , 2010 .

[5]  M. Cil,et al.  3D evolution of sand fracture under 1D compression , 2014 .

[6]  M. Rivers Proppant Fracture Conductivity With High Proppant Loading and High Closure Stress , 2012 .

[7]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Conductivity and performance of hydraulic fractures partially filled with compressible proppant packs , 2015 .

[8]  Jianfeng Wang,et al.  On the role of particle breakage in the shear failure behavior of granular soils by DEM , 2013 .

[9]  Kishore K. Mohanty,et al.  Evaluation of ultra-light-weight proppants for shale fracturing , 2012 .

[10]  I. Georgopoulos,et al.  DEM simulations of stiff and soft materials with crushable particles: an application of expanded perlite as a soft granular material , 2013 .

[11]  Bahram Rezai,et al.  Discrete element modeling for predicting breakage behavior and fracture energy of a single particle in a jaw crusher , 2010 .

[12]  David J. Williams,et al.  A calibration methodology to obtain material parameters for the representation of fracture mechanics based on discrete element simulations , 2017 .

[13]  Félix Darve,et al.  Numerical simulation of drained triaxial test using 3D discrete element modeling , 2009 .

[14]  D. Tannant,et al.  Frac Sand Crushing Characteristics and Morphology Changes under High Compressive Stress and Implications for Sand Pack Permeability , 2016 .

[15]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  ONE-DIMENSIONAL COMPRESSION BEHAVIOUR OF UNIFORMLY GRADED SAND RELATED TO SINGLE PARTICLE CRUSHING STRENGTH , 2001 .

[16]  DEM simulation on the one-dimensional compression behavior of various shaped crushable granular materials , 2013 .

[17]  Jialiang Zhang,et al.  A permeability model for the hydraulic fracture filled with proppant packs under combined effect of compaction and embedment , 2017 .

[18]  DEM of triaxial tests on crushable sand , 2014 .

[19]  A. Gens,et al.  An approach to enhance efficiency of DEM modelling of soils with crushable grains , 2015 .

[20]  Y. Cheng,et al.  A DEM investigation of the effect of particle-size distribution on one-dimensional compression , 2013 .

[21]  G. Cho,et al.  PARTICLE SHAPE AND CRUSHING EFFECTS ON DIRECT SHEAR BEHAVIOR USING DEM , 2011 .

[22]  Huabin Wang,et al.  A new probabilistic approach for predicting particle crushing in one-dimensional compression of granular soil , 2014 .

[23]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  A probabilistic approach to sand particle crushing in the triaxial test , 1999 .

[24]  P. Cundall,et al.  A bonded-particle model for rock , 2004 .

[25]  Denis Vallet,et al.  Numerical model of crushing of grains inside two-dimensional granular materials , 1999 .

[26]  V. Puri,et al.  A Fully Coupled Geomechanics and Fluid Flow Model for Proppant Pack Failure and Fracture Conductivity Damage Analysis , 2014 .

[27]  Luis E. Vallejo,et al.  Crushing a weak granular material: experimental numerical analyses , 2005 .

[28]  C. Kwok,et al.  DEM simulations of soil creep due to particle crushing , 2013 .

[29]  K. Hanley,et al.  Particle-scale mechanics of sand crushing in compression and shearing using DEM , 2015 .

[30]  Glenn R. McDowell,et al.  On the micro mechanics of one-dimensional normal compression , 2013 .

[31]  D. Vallet,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of brittle cement grains , 1995, Journal of Materials Science.

[32]  Dwayne D. Tannant,et al.  Improved estimate of the effective diameter for use in the Kozeny–Carman equation for permeability prediction , 2017 .

[33]  Itai Einav,et al.  The role of self-organization during confined comminution of granular materials , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  Glenn R. McDowell,et al.  Particle breakage criteria in discrete-element modelling , 2016 .

[35]  Adrian R. Russell,et al.  Crushing of particles in idealised granular assemblies , 2009 .