Fluid–structure interaction study on the performance of flexible articulated caudal fin

In this paper, the propulsive performance of a flexible articulated caudal fin is investigated by fluid–structure interaction. The caudal fin is composed of two links which are connected by a hinge. One link is driven by pitching motion while the other one moves passively. Five cases of link flexibility are investigated, namely, the rigid–rigid case, the medium flexible–medium flexible case, the flexible–flexible case, the rigid–flexible case and the flexible–rigid case. Their fluid field and structure deformations are analysed and hydrodynamic forces are compared. It is found that the rigid–rigid caudal fin produces larger thrust force than other cases with a low-pitching frequency, while the rigid–flexible case performs better with a higher frequency. The mean thrust force increases with the frequency in our experiments, however, for the medium flexible–medium flexible case, an optimal frequency exists. Besides, the effect of the hinge stiffness is studied. It is seen that the medium flexible–medium flexible case exhibits a striking performance. When the hinge stiffness decreases, its mean thrust force increases and possesses larger amplitude while the forces of other cases decrease. These results can guide the design of flexible propeller with links and will be useful for the development of flexible underwater robots. Graphical Abstract

[1]  Ender A. Finol,et al.  Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid-structure interaction study , 2007 .

[2]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Bioinspiration from fish for smart material design and function , 2011 .

[3]  Zheng Li,et al.  Robot fish with a novel biomimetic wire-driven flapping propulsor , 2014, Adv. Robotics.

[4]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Flexible Flapping Airfoil Propulsion at Zero Freestream Velocity , 2003 .

[5]  Junzhi Yu,et al.  Towards development of a slider-crank centered self-propelled dolphin robot , 2013, Adv. Robotics.

[6]  Shusheng Bi,et al.  Effect of spanwise flexibility on propulsion performance of a flapping hydrofoil at low Reynolds number , 2012 .

[7]  Shanhong Ji,et al.  Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions , 1999 .

[8]  Dragos Viieru,et al.  A Study of Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flexible Airfoils , 2007 .

[9]  Christopher J. Esposito,et al.  A robotic fish caudal fin: effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish Capable of Escape Maneuvers Using Fluidic Elastomer Actuators. , 2014, Soft robotics.

[11]  Lei Wang,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction study on a flexible robotic pectoral fin , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[12]  Masataka Nakabayashi,et al.  Bioinspired Propulsion Mechanism Using a Fin with a Dynamic Variable-Effective-Length Spring , 2009 .

[13]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Effect of Spanwise Flexibility on Flapping Wing Propulsion , 2006 .

[14]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Numerical Simulation of a Flapping Foil with Chordwise or Spanwise Flexibility , 2007 .

[15]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Kinematic Condition for Maximizing the Thrust of a Robotic Fish Using a Compliant Caudal Fin , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  G. Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of a biologically inspired tandem flapping foil configuration , 2007 .

[17]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Hydrodynamic propulsion by large amplitude oscillation of an airfoil with chordwise flexibility , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Sensory Feedback of a Fish Robot with Tunable Elastic Tail Fin , 2013, Living Machines.

[19]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Propulsion performance of a skeleton-strengthened fin , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical simulation of the fluid dynamics of 2D rigid body motion with the vortex particle method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Jie Yang,et al.  A Novel Implementation of a Flexible Robotic Fin Actuated by Shape Memory Alloy , 2012 .

[22]  Jin Hwan Ko,et al.  Effect of chord flexure on aerodynamic performance of a flapping wing , 2010 .

[23]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Dynamically coupled fluid-body interactions in vorticity-based numerical simulations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  Kah Bin Lim,et al.  Numerical analysis of active chordwise flexibility on the performance of non-symmetrical flapping airfoils , 2010 .

[25]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Computational Fluid-Body Interaction of Hinge Connected Flapping Plate in Hover , 2011 .

[26]  George V Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of caudal fin locomotion by chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus (Scombridae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  Masaki Hamamoto,et al.  Application of fluid–structure interaction analysis to flapping flight of insects with deformable wings , 2007, Adv. Robotics.

[28]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of the fluid dynamics of a flapping wing with low order flexibility , 2008 .

[29]  Neil Bose,et al.  Propulsive performance of three naturally occurring oscillating propeller planforms , 1993 .

[30]  T. Kambe,et al.  Hydromechanics of lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2 , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Function of the Caudal Fin During Locomotion in Fishes: Kinematics, Flow Visualization, and Evolutionary Patterns1 , 2000 .