Making Room for Manufacturing: Understanding Industrial Land Conversion in Cities

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Planners face tension when dealing with the stock of urban industrial land: Should they enact industrial land preservation policies to protect viable manufacturers that provide good jobs even if it exacerbates the problem of affordable housing and causes cities to forgo growth in other sectors? Planners need better information on the underlying forces that lead to conversion of industrial land and an assessment of the effectiveness of preservation policies. We develop here an index of vulnerability of industrial land that is based on location factors, neighborhood dynamics, detailed industrial trends, environmental hazards, and local regulations. We show how these factors can explain the probability of the conversion of industrial land to other uses in Cook County (IL) and Mecklenburg County (NC) and describe how various industrial preservation polices are effective in limiting conversion. Takeaway for practice: Cities can use this index to strategically plan for industries to target and sites to preserve as industrial uses. Traditional planning and regulatory tools such as industrial zone designations do reduce conversion risk, while factors such as transit accessibility increase the probability of conversion. We argue that local governments should be strategic about which manufacturing industries can be preserved at what locations using these tools. We also develop and demonstrate an open source, interactive, web-based tool that demonstrates some of the key concepts that can be replicated in other places.

[1]  T. Lester,et al.  The Long-Term Employment Impacts of Gentrification in the 1990s , 2013 .

[2]  Sharon Zukin Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change , 1982 .

[3]  A. Scott Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe* , 1988 .

[4]  Elvin K. Wyly,et al.  Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification , 1999 .

[5]  M. Howland Planning for Industry in a Post-Industrial World , 2010 .

[6]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[7]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[8]  T. Bunting,et al.  The Social Ecology of the Post-Fordist/Global City? Economic Restructuring and Socio-spatial Polarisation in the Toronto Urban Region , 2001 .

[9]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[10]  J. Miron The Geography of Competition , 2010 .

[11]  Marie Howland,et al.  The Role of Contamination in Central City Industrial Decline , 2004 .

[12]  De Sousa,et al.  Brownfields Redevelopment and the Quest for Sustainability , 2008 .

[13]  N. G. Leigh,et al.  Economic Revitalization: Cases and Strategies for City and Suburb , 2002 .

[14]  Zelda Bronstein Industry and the smart city , 2009 .

[15]  Nancey Green Leigh,et al.  Smart Growth's Blind Side , 2012 .

[16]  A. Losch The Nature of Economic Regions , 1938 .

[17]  D. McGrath,et al.  Urban Industrial Land Redevelopment and Contamination Risk , 2000 .

[18]  FROM MANUFACTURING ZONE TO LIFESTYLE PRECINCT: ECONOMIC RESTRUCTURING AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN INNER MELBOURNE, 1971–2001 , 2009 .

[19]  Karen Chapple,et al.  The Highest and Best Use? Urban Industrial Land and Job Creation , 2014 .

[20]  Kenneth R. Troske The Dynamic Adjustment Process of Firm Entry and Exit in Manufacturing and Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate , 1996, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[21]  Winifred Curran 'From the Frying Pan to the Oven': Gentrification and the Experience of Industrial Displacement in Williamsburg, Brooklyn , 2007 .

[22]  Joel Rast Remaking Chicago: The Political Origins of Urban Industrial Change , 1999 .

[23]  Douglas Koritz Restructuring or Destructuring? , 1991 .