Cost-effectiveness Analysis Of Five Different Antibiotic Regimens For The Treatment Of Uncomplicated Chlamydia Trachomatis Cervicitis

Background: The new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention treatment guidelines for Chlamydia trachomatis include two recently available drugs, azithromycin and ofloxacin. The best choice for initial therapy remains controversial. Objectives: We wanted to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. Methods: Using information gathered from a MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1966 to 1994, employing the key words “cervicitis,” “C. trachomatis,” “erythromycin,” “tetracycline,” “doxycycline,” “ofloxacin,” and “azithromycin,” we developed a decision analysis model specific for a nonpregnant woman with uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. Options in this model included an initially cured infection, a failed initial cure resulting in persistent cervicitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease treated either on an inpatient or outpatient basis. Probability estimates for each option were derived from previously published reports. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for three end points: cost per cure with initial therapy, cost per case of pelvic inflammatory disease averted, and cost per hospitalization averted. Sensitivity analyses were done by varying the cure rates for each antibiotic and the complication rates for failed therapy. The costs incurred for treatment were also varied. Results: Using the high estimate for initial cure rates, doxycycline and tetracycline were the most cost-effective agents. Azithromycin was the next most cost-effective agent, followed by ofloxacin and erythromycin. To achieve an equivalent final cost, the probability of initial cure with azithromycin must exceed that of doxycycline by 3 percentage points. As the cost of azithromycin decreases, the difference in initial cure rates between the two drugs to achieve an equivalent final cost becomes smaller. Conclusions: Doxycycline remains the drug of choice in the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. The results favor the use of azithromycin rather than doxycycline when there is concern for compliance to the standard doxycycline regimen. A lower cost for azithromycin could favor its use as the drug of choice.

[1]  R. Thin,et al.  Double-blind comparison of two regimens in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis. Seven-day vs 21-day course of triple tetracyclinc (Deteclo). , 1979, The British journal of venereal diseases.

[2]  E. Lycke,et al.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women , 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  W. Jordan Doxycycline vs. Tetracycline in the Treatment of Men with Gonorrhea: The Compliance Factor , 1981 .

[4]  K. Weismann,et al.  Treatment of Chlamydial Urethritis in Men and Chlamydia trachomatis‐pos/f/Ve Female Partners: Comparison of Erythromycin and Tetracycline in Treatment Courses of One Week , 1982, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  G. Ridgway,et al.  Comparison of tetracycline and minocycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis. , 1983, The British journal of venereal diseases.

[6]  A. Washington,et al.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections. , 1983, Epidemiologic reviews.

[7]  Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Policy guidelines for prevention and control. , 1985, MMWR supplements.

[8]  H. Handsfield Problems in the Treatment of Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 1986, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[9]  Harrison Hr,et al.  Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Chlamydial Infections , 1986 .

[10]  A. Washington,et al.  Treatment of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections. , 1986, JAMA.

[11]  A. Washington,et al.  The economic cost of pelvic inflammatory disease. , 1986, JAMA.

[12]  T. Clemens,et al.  Tumor-induced osteomalacia: kinetics of calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D metabolism and characteristics of bone histomorphometry , 1987 .

[13]  A. Washington,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States. What are they costing us? , 1987, JAMA.

[14]  H. Handsfield Control of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections. , 1987, JAMA.

[15]  S. E. Haynes,et al.  A prospective single‐blind trial of minocycline and doxycycline in the treatment of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women , 1989, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  A. White,et al.  Efficacy and safety of ofloxacin in the treatment of nongonococcal sexually transmitted disease. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  T. Derouen,et al.  Randomized treatment of mucopurulent cervicitis with doxycycline or amoxicillin , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  K. Tack,et al.  Randomized comparison of ofloxacin and doxycycline for chlamydia and ureaplasma urethritis and cervicitis. , 1990, Chemotherapy.

[19]  B. Katz,et al.  A Randomized Trial to Compare 7− and 21‐Day Tetracycline Regimens in the Prevention of Recurrence of Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis , 1991, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[20]  P. Katz,et al.  Cost of and payment source for pelvic inflammatory disease. Trends and projections, 1983 through 2000. , 1991 .

[21]  W. Stamm Azithromycin in the treatment of uncomplicated genital chlamydial infections. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Cox,et al.  A randomized trial of ofloxacin versus cefoxitin and doxycycline in the outpatient treatment of acute salpingitis. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  R. B. Jones,et al.  New treatments for Chlamydia trachomatis , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  S. Faro,et al.  Effectiveness of ofloxacin in the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae cervical infection. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  A. Washington,et al.  Cost of and payment source for pelvic inflammatory disease: Trends and projections, 1983 through 2000 , 1992, JAMA.

[26]  M. Corrado The clinical experience with ofloxacin in the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  D. Martin,et al.  A controlled trial of a single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis. The Azithromycin for Chlamydial Infections Study Group. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Robert B. Jones,et al.  A Controlled Trial of a Single Dose of Azithromycin for the Treatment of Chlamydial Urethritis and Cervicitis , 1992 .

[29]  W. Bowie,et al.  Minocycline Compared with Doxycycline in the Treatment of Nongonococcal Urethritis and Mucopurulent Cervicitis , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  M. Oh,et al.  Single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of genital chlamydial infections in adolescents. , 1993, The Journal of pediatrics.