Environmental Attitudes as Predictors of Policy Support across Three Countries

Stephen Kellert’s typology of attitudes and Dunlap and Van Liere’s New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) Scale represent two different approaches to environmental attitudes. Both approaches were used to predict policy support for environmental protection among college students in Trinidad, the Dominican Republic, and the United States. Results showed country and gender differences in the strength of environmental attitudes. Trinidadians showed the strongest proenvironmental attitudes on the NEP, and both Trinidadians and Dominicans showed stronger proenvironmental attitudes than Americans as indicated by both the NEP and the moralistic/aesthetic items derived from Kellert’s typology. The different attitude measures were differentially predictive of policy support in the three countries. Overall, the best predictors of support for environmentally protective policies were the NEP and Kellert’s Utilitarian factor. These results support the notion that combining the Kellert approach with Dunlap and Van Liere’s NEP does increase the predictability of environmental policy support.

[1]  D. Nowell,et al.  The new environmental paradigm scale: Wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia , 1989 .

[2]  S. Kellert,et al.  Perceptions of animals in american society , 1976 .

[3]  S. Kellert.  The Public and the Timber Wolf in Minnesota , 1987 .

[4]  Robert B. Bechtel,et al.  Environmental Belief Systems , 1999 .

[5]  Örjan Wiidegren,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms , 1998 .

[6]  V. Corral-Verdugo,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” in a Mexican Community , 2000 .

[7]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[8]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[9]  R. Inglehart.  Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[10]  S. Kellert.  Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behavior Toward Wildlife Among the Industrial Superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany , 1993 .

[11]  Suzanne C. Thompson,et al.  Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment , 1994 .

[12]  Nicholas P. Lovrich,et al.  Political culture, postmaterial values, and the new environmental paradigm: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States , 1989 .

[13]  Geoffrey Gooch,et al.  Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States , 1995 .

[14]  John B. Unipan,et al.  Acculturation and Ecological Worldview Among Latino Americans , 2000 .

[15]  Michael Leahy,et al.  The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society , 1997, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[16]  S. Kellert,et al.  Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway , 1998 .

[17]  Michael A. Tarrant,et al.  The Effect of Respondent Characteristics on General Environmental Attitude-Behavior Correspondence , 1997 .

[18]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Ark II; social response to environmental imperatives , 1973 .

[19]  B. Kaltenborn,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF ECOCENTRIC AND ANTHROPOCENTRIC MOTIVES TO ATTITUDES TOWARD LARGE CARNIVORES , 1999 .

[20]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[21]  M. P. Maloney,et al.  Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. , 1973 .

[22]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[23]  F. Noe,et al.  Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern , 1990 .

[24]  P. Schultz,et al.  VALUES AS PREDICTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES: EVIDENCE FOR CONSISTENCY ACROSS 14 COUNTRIES , 1999 .

[25]  B. Kaltenborn,et al.  Attachment to Livestock and Attitudes Toward Large Carnivores Among Sheep Farmers in Norway , 1998 .

[26]  S. Kellert.  Japanese Perceptions of Wildlife , 1991 .

[27]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Values and Proenvironmental Behavior , 1998 .

[28]  Don E. Albrecht,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale. , 1982 .

[29]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human behavior and environment : advances in theory and research , 1976 .

[30]  Alec M. Gallup,et al.  Of Global Concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey. , 1993 .

[31]  M. Shinn,et al.  Research on Homelessness: An Introduction. , 1990 .

[32]  Luther Standing Bear.  Land of the spotted eagle , 1978 .

[33]  Don E. Albrecht,et al.  MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM SCALE , 1982 .

[34]  S. Kellert.  Affective, Cognitive, and Evaluative Perceptions of Animals , 1983 .

[35]  N. Lovrich,et al.  Culture, Politics and Mass Publics: Traditional and Modern Supporters of The New Environmental Paradigm In Japan and the United States , 1987, The Journal of Politics.

[36]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[37]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[38]  Andrzej Furman,et al.  A Note on Environmental Concern in a Developing Country , 1998 .

[39]  Jack M. Geller,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A Reexamination , 1985 .